Obsolete news here. This is more recent:
This is great news. Thanks for sharing. --Benjy
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4GLTE smartphone
----- Reply message -----
From:
To:
Subject: Ateneo rejects RH bill
Date: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 8:28 pm
This article is from the CBCP Monitor:
CBCP Monitor Vol16 n18
Ateneo rejects RH bill
By Roy Lagarde
THE Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU) has reaffirmed its opposition to the controversial reproductive health (RH) bill opposed by the Catholic Church.
ADMU president Fr. Jose Ramon Villarin, SJ said the university has never changed its stand against artificial contraception together with the Catholic hierarchy.
“Together with our leaders in the Catholic Church, the Ateneo de Manila University does not support the passage of House Bill 4244 (The Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health and Population and Development Bill),”Villarin said.“
As many of these leaders have pointed out, the present form of the proposed bill contains provisions that could be construed to threaten constitutional rights as well as to weaken commonly shared human and spiritual values,” he said.
The head of one of the country’s leading universities made the statement August 20 as a reaction to the endorsement made by 159 ADMU professors for the passage of the RH bill.
It also followed a strong appeal made by the head of the Catholic Bishops ‘Conference of the Philippines for Catholic schools not to defy the teachings of the Church.
In letter to the CBCP, the Jesuit hierarchy has also assured support forth CBCP in its fight against the bill, which will require billions of pesos in taxpayers’ money to fund contraception and sterilization programs as well as “questionable” ***-education modules.
Fr. Jose Magadia, provincial superior of the Society of Jesus in the Philip-pines, said that in the country’s many struggles, they have always sought to work with the bishops as their “pastors and guides.”
“This means, as has happened in many prior issues of national concern, it is our preference not to lead you but to follow you, our Bishops,” Magadia said.
“May such spirit continue even as we remain one with you in prayer and in desire that fullness of the Gospel be proclaimed for all our people,” he said.
Don’t defy Church teachings
Archbishop Jose Palma, CBCP president, asserted that Catholic universities must teach and uphold the official teachings of the Church.
“If we are a Catholic school, we should not teach anything contrary to the official teachings of the church,” Palma said.
Amid the debate on a controversial artificial contraception measure, he admitted that there is a clash of beliefs between the church and teachers of some Catholic schools.
“In some places, we first talk to them because some teachers may have some misunderstanding of what they think of freedom of conscience or academic freedom,” said Palma.
“In some of the universities, we say that if you want to teach that idea, do not do it in a Catholic school because we are confusing the students… do it in other universities,” he said.
The CBCP head stressed that the motive why many parents send their children to Catholic schools are for reasons of faith formation.
“They are hoping that their children will learn the Catholic teaching and also the Catholic formation,’ he said. “It will be a contradiction if we will bombard them with ideas which are against the official teachings of the Catholic faith,” added Palma.
Open to dialogue
Palma said the CBCP is also willing to conduct dialogue with professors of the Jesuit-run Ateneo De Manila University over the RH bill.
“For me, there’s really a need for a sincere dialogue because the professors, I think must be motivated by their desire to discover what is good,” Palma said.
The bishops, he said, are open to dialogue with the pro-RH bill Ateneo professors “because we are all part of the Church and we are responsible for our actions.”
“We are willing to meet other people with dialogue,” said the soft-spoken prelate.
He also revealed that members of the CBCP Permanent Council will meet on September 4 to talk on certain “academic concerns” related to RH bill.
“We will talk about good approaches, solutions and the task of Catholic universities to seek the truth and of course to continue studying and working out hoping to come out with possible solutions to many concerns from the academic and also related points of view,” Palma said.
“In the search, we should be guided by the light of truth or by the light of faith. That is the mission of the Church,” he said.
Palma also lauded the ‘sincerity’ of the ADMU administration and the Philippine Province of the Society of Jesus in standing with the CBCP against the RH bill.
“They are both sincere in saying that they are with us together with the Catholic Church when they said that they are with us,” he said.
‘Not trigger happy’
Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Socrates Villegas, CBCP vice president, echoed Palma’s statement and emphasized that the bishops are not just acting on issues without valid reason.
“We bishops are not trigger happy with imposing penalties because we, at first, are brothers and we, at first, are fathers who need to guide and correct,” Villegas said.
He made the statement during a press conference at the start of the 2012 Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines (CEAP) Annual Convention at the SMX Center in Pasay City on August 29.
According to him, the bishops would always resort to dialogue in cases of misunderstandings within the church.
“When we see errors, the first thing that we do is to dialogue… call the child and ask for an explanation then explain my side and listen to his side. Let us talk,” he said.
If the dialogue does not work, he said that by law, there has to be a written reprimand and they go on with investigation.
“But if the child of the Church remains incorrigible, then that is when the sanctions are imposed. And the sanctions are not always excommunication. It is not always termination from the job. There are different degrees of sanction,” said Villegas, who also chairs the CBCP Episcopal Commission on Catechesis and Catholic Education.
The CEAP also reiterated its “one-ness” with the bishops and expressed its strong objection to any law, which promotes “abortifacient regulation of birth.”
“The killing of human life is absolutely forbidden. It is prohibited by the Philippines Constitution and prohibited by the 5th Commandment. The CEAP is one (with the bishops) in protecting human life from the moment of conception,” the CEAP said in a statement read by its National Advocacy Commission Chair, Fr. Joel Tabora SJ.
“The CEAP supports the bishops in their official teachings, which is binding all believers the official teaching concerning the dignity of human life, the need to choose life and to support a culture of life and to affirm and reaffirm the sacredness of ***uality,” said Tabora, who is also the president of Ateneo De Davao University.
Contradiction
In a statement, the Ateneo professors said that the RH bill is not a population control measure but a legislation that promotes ***ual reproductive rights, the right to health and the right to in-formed choice.
Their position, however, contradicts the statement of no other than President Benigno Aquino III who wants the bill passed, saying that population control is the answer to the backlogs in education and the alleviation of poverty.
The professors first released this statement in 2008, and reiterated their stand recently as the House entered into the period of amendments on the RH measure.
They also stated that they are not speaking for the entire Ateneo institution and only expressing their personal position.
Villarin also asked Ateneo professors who are engaged in the Christian formation to ensure that the “Catholic position on this matter continues to be taught in our classes, as we have always done.”
He added the university will continue to support the Church in its future actions should the bill is passed by Congress.
“Should the bill with whatever amendments be passed, we should neither hesitate to bring to the judiciary whatever legal questions we may have nor cease to be vigilant in ensuring that no coercion takes place in implantation,” he added.