PH hit on Nobel boycott
Human rights activists shocked
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 00:09:00 12/10/2010
Filed Under: Human Rights, Awards and Prizes, Foreign affairs & international relations, Government, Trade (general), Diplomacy
Most Read
Other Most Read Stories x
News
o PH hit on Nobel boycott
o Who's staying away from Nobel peace ceremony
o Aquino slams SC decision
o The President’s advisers are legal pygmies
o Winner of P741-M lotto jackpot surfaces to claim prize
o Ampatuan patriarch offered P50-M bribe to jail warden–DILG chief
o Aquino to media: I will ‘hide and hide’ my romantic life
o POC bats for football match between PH, Indonesia in Bacolod City
o Japan team says stem cells made paralysed monkey jump again
o Stay cool, Lagman advises President
News Most Read RSS
Close this
MANILA, Philippines—Human rights activists and lawmakers were shocked and disappointed at the Philippine government’s decision to align with China in boycotting the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony honoring imprisoned Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo.
“The Philippines prides itself on its democratic values, which is why it is shocking to see this government turning its back on Liu Xiaobo’s nonviolent struggle for free expression in China,” Elaine Pearson, deputy director for Asia of The Human Rights Watch, said in a statement.
Pearson noted that President Benigno Aquino III’s mother, the late democracy icon Corazon Aquino, was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, the same year she led the peaceful People Power Revolution that ousted Marcos.
The Philippines declined the invitation to attend Friday’s ceremony in Oslo, Norway.
Pearson said skipping the ceremony along with 17 other countries, including China’s allies such as Venezuela and Cuba, regional neighbors including Vietnam and Kazakhstan, and business partners such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, meant that the Philippines “is failing to live up to its promise to promote human rights in Asia.”
Calling the Department of Foreign Affairs’ decision disappointing, Akbayan party-list Rep. Walden Bello said he would write letters of protest to both the DFA and the Chinese Embassy in Manila.
“We protest if the US tries to pressure us. I think we should equally protest when the Chinese do so. We should not let this superpower slap us around,” Bello said.
He noted that human rights had been central in the struggle against the Marcos dictatorship and for democracy. “This has been institutionalized,” he said.
Caving in
Bello believed that the DFA caved in to China’s pressure. “This person is a human rights activist with a great record,” he said of Liu. “What the Chinese did was an awful pressure for us not to attend.”
The DFA refused to say whether Beijing, a key trading partner, had pressured Manila to stay away from the event.
DFA spokesperson Eduardo Malaya confirmed that no Philippine representative would attend the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony.
Malaya said Manila’s envoy to Oslo, Elizabeth Buencuceso, was out of Norway on an official consular mission. “Our ambassador to Norway has a scheduling conflict,” he said.
However, two senior government officials who did not want to be named said the move was meant to appease China, which had repeatedly warned governments around the world that ties would be harmed if they attended the ceremony.
China reacted furiously to the decision by the Nobel committee to award this year’s peace prize to Liu, who was jailed for 11 years last December on subversion charges after calling for the reform of one-party communist rule.
“We do not want to further annoy China,” said a senior diplomat at the DFA, who asked not to be named.
Avoiding irritant
A Malacaņang official said President Aquino “did not want another irritant” in Manila’s ties with Beijing.
The Philippines has been working hard to repair diplomatic ties with China following the botched rescue of a bus hijacking in Manila that left eight Hong Kong tourists dead in August.
Chinese Ambassador to Manila Liu Jianchao said China appreciated the “understanding shown by the Philippine government” in joining the boycott of the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony.
“We will say the move of the Philippines indicates the understanding of the Philippine government toward the stand of the Chinese government and people,” Liu said in a chance interview at the DFA.
Foreign Secretary Alberto Romulo, interviewed at the same event, was tight-lipped, declining to comment on the Philippine move.
“We will see, because it’s still Dec. 10... We will see, after tomorrow, or tomorrow, OK?” he told reporters.
Blow to free expression
Harry Roque, chair of the Manila-based Center for International Law, an advocacy group promoting human rights, said the Philippine decision was a blow to the cause of free expression.
“The last thing the Philippines should be known for is as a supporter to the repressive policies of the Chinese government,” Roque said.
Deputy Speaker Lorenzo Taņada III said he was “saddened” by the government’s decision not to send a representative to the awarding ceremony, but doubted that this diminished the country’s image as a democracy.
Tightrope
In Southeast Asia, the Philippines has been one of the most vocal governments in calling for the return of democracy in military-ruled Burma (Myanmar).
A staunch US ally and host to hundreds of American counterterrorism troops in Mindanao, the Philippine government has walked a tightrope in its relations with increasingly assertive China.
Beijing has been investing in the Philippines, particularly in infrastructure projects, but the two countries are also facing off in hotly disputed South China Sea islands, where the United States is promoting the peaceful resolution of territorial disputes.
Trade between the countries has been expanding since the 1990s, with China now the Philippines’ third largest trading partner next to the United States and Japan. With reports from AFP, DJ Yap and TJ Burgonio