Tanong lang po mga kapuso. San ba papunta ang mga atheist pag na dead na sila? May concept ba sila about after-life? Kasi yung existence nila parang walang purpose. D po ba?
Tanong lang po mga kapuso. San ba papunta ang mga atheist pag na dead na sila? May concept ba sila about after-life? Kasi yung existence nila parang walang purpose. D po ba?
the purpose of all humans should be to make this world a better place! it's the only planet we've got for nowso please don't screw it up for the rest of us (yes i'm talking about irrational religious people bent on destroying the world)
you may choose to believe in life-after-death fairy tales but when you die your body decomposes, your neurons turn into mush. but you do leave behind your legacy, your contributions to this world both good and bad. your genes SURVIVE in your offspring.
we haven't achieved immortality yet so MAKE THIS ONE COUNT! start today. don't wait for the next life which will never come
I partly agree with this, about not allowing irrational religious people screwing and destroying the world. However, it is not only irrational religious people screwing and destroying the world but also evil and irrational atheists, like Stalin, Hitler, Mao Tse Tung, doing their share. Needless to stress, whether you are religious (with the twisted understanding of God) or atheist (with their utopian dream of the world), humans are capable of destroying the world if they lack the universal virtue (which Christ exposes) of loving one another.
you missed my post about stalin. it wasn't about atheism. stalin was THE godthat was their STATE RELIGION. it's the same right now in north korea, check it out for yourself if you don't believe what i'm saying
hitler was a catholic'nuff said
atheists aren't gonna destroy the world coz that's the very thing we abhor about religious people!!!as i said it's the only one we've got why the hell should we destroy it???
the GOLDEN RULE predates christ by a veeeeeeeeeery long time so please
Communism does not have a religion. Religion to them is an opium of the people. They do not have a God. Basically, they are all atheists. Hitler was a former catholic before he rejected God and became an atheist. I bet, Vodka, you, an atheist, have a religion before you became one. Yes, any person can say that he does not want to destroy the world but does anyway. Just by trowing away one's garbage anywhere contributes to the destruction. Yes, the Golden Rule predates the birth of Christ, as a man. But we must remember, that Christ as God existed from the beginning of time.
Canada's prime minister will be attending the pride parade.
KO punch to a has been boxer and wannabe politician. [emoji23]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hope every gays that you meet starts rubbing it on to you that they are gays. i dont know man, im fine knowing someones gay. but i definitely dont need someone flaunting it like its a f*cking big deal. i dont ****ing go on a parade just to say i am a man and have to be treated as such.
I dont know what do you mean by being persecuted. But a man has been fending off dinosaurs and all other host of predators since the dawn of time. It is how a man develop his survival skills. It is the reason why you and everyone is here. A man did his job well to survive til today. So i guess a man deserves to lounge and drink beer when he wanted to? To relax and enjoy until it is needed to fend off another predator, an alien maybe? Where I am getting at is I think a gay parade is an activity for a certain community to be recognized and i hope thats not all that. Will recognizing them make a huge leaped in the quality of our lives? I think the world doesnt really care of the trivials matters like someone elses ***ual orientation. We already came a long way from sending queers to mental institution to accepting them in the society. Turing and Keynes didnt go on a crusade to be recognized. They let their work do the talking. They devote their time and energy to their works. They suffered greatly because of the stigma but at the end, it is their works thats been recognize and not their ***ual orrientation.
i live under a rock with a nice bonfire. so in a nutshell youre saying this parade is an annual reminder to everyone that gay exist? all right, i know that already. what else do i need to know?
haay nako, isa nanaman
Anyways, the world gobbles up trivial matters, they can't get enough of it, go look around.
As for the rest of your statement.. idk/idc what you're portraying yourself to be, I'm not gonna bother cause its gonna be pretentious and ultimately pointless.
The belt is not proof that the nazis or natzis are God Fearing people--- lol
Nakalagay Lang sa belt-- makadios na agad?
When you say God Fearing-- takot ka gumawa ng masama-- or labag sa Utos ng dios--
On the contrary, I think the view of Glenn Manikis is not unsophisticated. Really, by just wearing a clothing accessory with the imprinted name of "God" shall not make one a believer of God. In like manner, proclaiming to the whole world that one is a follower of God shall not make him/her a believer of God. It takes more than that. It takes a faithful adherence to the teachings of the Lord and of doing good to his/her fellowmen. Those are the things the Nazis never had.
that post is the sort of unsophisticated view that i was talking about"god" means different things to different people and is used for many different purposes. that's why you always hear politicians say god all the time, coz god is a TOOL that somehow gives legitimacy
for some, god is an imaginary friend you could lean to in times of need, sort of like an adult pacifier
![]()
Niky, Vodka, I greatly appreciate your posts because they are mind opening. However, pardon me if I sound irreverent or condescending but as a former atheist (perhaps I am not a true atheist as a true atheist shall not change his stand), there are things which I think seems contradictory and which I think is the fallacy of atheism. I may even sound "simplistic and unsophisticated" to your standard.
It is a known trait that atheists would always demand proof before they would subscribe to a view as a fact or truth. Take the issue of science and religion/faith. Many atheists would prefer science to explain matters over religion/faith as to them science offered evidence of the existence of a particular thing (scientific proof) over the propositions of religion (religious faith). By the way, there is nothing wrong with science as the nature of the universe should as much as possible be explained concretely for the betterment and progress of mankind. What I am questioning is how science is being purportedly used by many atheists to discount the existence of God. The position of many atheists is that if it is not proved scientifically, then it has no truth on it. Take the existence of God, atheists shall say that since there is no scientific proof to the existence, then they shall not subscribe to the view that God really exists. In the application of scientific proof as a barometer of truth of explaining things, I think the atheists are inconsistent. For example, aliens. Many scientists and atheists believe that there are other intelligent beings in the universe (aside from human beings) existing in the universe. But what scientific proof is there that that is the truth. Aside from the so called "scientific speculations or presumptions", there is none. It remains a theory without evidentiary support. Yet, people (including many atheists) will not discount such theory and even claims the same as fact. They would pursue such theory and even perform scientific studies (mostly presumptions) to say that it is so. On the other hand, as to the issue of the existence of God, atheists and even the scientific community readily dismissed the idea as improbable or false, saying that there is no evidence or proof to it. The alien exists and God does not. Does it ever occur to us that the very existence of the universe proves that there is God or Supreme Being that created it? Besides, God revealed Himself to mankind many times throughout history. God revealed himself to Abraham, to Noah, to Moses and to others but mankind had chosen to ignore Him. He likewise sent His only Son, Jesus Christ (the Second Person in the Blessed Trinity) but people still doubted Him. Does it also ever occur to us that He can only reveal Himself but not to completely manifest Himself since Man is given the choice? God cannot just come to this world anytime riding in a golden chariot pronouncing He is God. That would destroy Man's free will. The only time that God through our Lord Jesus Christ could come and openly manifest Himself is on the day of judgment which would also be the coming of the end of the world.
Finally, the so-called "scientific truth" is not even absolute as a scientific theory supported by such scientific truth can be supplanted or superceded by another discovery upon further scientific study. The scientific truth yesterday is not the scientific truth now. It is an ever changing landscape for science. Man should progress materially (through Science) and spiritually (through faith).
bro rfgoons anu reason bat ngbackslide ka? good to hear ngbalik loob kna uli..
How about bestiality? Ano stand ni pacyou? Condemn it's rin dapat yun live in partner ng nanay niya. [emoji23][emoji85]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk