New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    39,174
    #1

    IMO, and this is from an outsider,- that is the way the parameters of any deal/sale should be determined,- at the time of the transaction.

    The downside of using the old market value is that the buyer will definitely have the attraction to dispose of the merchandise in a jiffy, because of the immediate profit. In the case of the land reform program,- this defeats its very purpose.

    16.7K:sampay:>>>:weathermanf2:

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,872
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by CVT View Post

    IMO, and this is from an outsider,- that is the way the parameters of any deal/sale should be determined,- at the time of the transaction.

    The downside of using the old market value is that the buyer will definitely have the attraction to dispose of the merchandise in a jiffy, because of the immediate profit. In the case of the land reform program,- this defeats its very purpose.

    16.7K:sampay:>>>:weathermanf2:
    I guess the risk goes both ways if you apply current fair market values.

    The entire crux of this goes to what constitutes "just compensation"? The SC has ruled time and again that it should be at fair market value. I would think its the correct interpretation as land reform did not in any way authorize the destruction of the landowner by absorbing a substantial loss on the taking of his property. In the same vein, distributees cannot assume that the land they're getting will be free.

  3. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,326
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Altis6453 View Post
    Haven't heard if HLI or the Cojuangcos actually appealed that part of the decision (re: just compensation and valuation). If they did, then it is only an collateral issue while the main argument, that is, whether or not the land should be distributed to the farmers, has already been decided. AFAIK, there is good reason (including numerous decided cases) to argue that the taking or transfer of property should always be based on fair market value at the time of taking.
    Yes.. fair market value at the time of taking.. i think the debate here would be when should it have been taken? nung 2006 upon revokation ng SDO (as ordered / decided upon by then DAR Secretary), or nung 1998 ba yun na di ko rin maalala ano yung event kung bakit naging possible reference yun...

  4. Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,406
    #4
    so politically motivated it appears na gamitin yung 1989 valuation

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,326
    #5
    di ko ma recall now yung basis to use 1998 valuation.. but.. on the surface.. it didn't seem political to me... unless may mga undercurrents...

  6. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #6
    Punitive. A way to stick it to the Cojuangcos.

  7. Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,003
    #7
    Buksan mga garahe ng mga tongressman na iyan. Tingnan natin kung ilang luxury and sports cars nakabalandra doon

    when you look into the abyss, the abyss looks into you

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

New Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno