MANILA, Philippines -- The commandant of the Philippine Marines Tuesday said allegations that Malacaņang had attempted to bribe congressmen and local officials had affected soldiers but that he had not yet heard grumbling so far.
Maj. Gen. Ben Dolorfino warned that any attempt by rogue elements of the
Armed Forces of the Philippines to overthrow the administration of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo could lead to a civil war.
“In one way or another, we are affected but our professionalism should reign over our respective personal and political interests,” Dolorfino told reporters in an interview at the Philippine Marines Headquarters in Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City.
He said he did not think there were indications of “grumbling” in the rank and file. He said the military leadership had been reminding officers and their men to distance themselves from “political squabbling” and instead focus on preserving peace and order.
The AFP conducts weekly Troop Information and Education (TINE) forum wherein troops are kept abreast of current events, among others.
“I have been making the rounds, telling officers and men that the Armed Forces of the Philippines should be apolitical at all times. We should be neutral because we are the only institution that is entrusted by society to maintain peace and order,” Dolorfino said, likening the military to a “solid wall.”
Lt. Col. Bartolome Bacarro, AFP spokesperson, acknowledged that the troops were conscious of the media reports on the alleged bribery.
“The issue might be subject of informal discussions, but this will not have an impact on AFP operations. They remain focused on their job,” Bacarro said in a text message to the Philippine Daily Inquirer, parent company of INQUIRER.net.
No serious impact on Army
Lt. Col. Ernesto Torres, Philippine Army spokesperson, told the Inquirer that the Army’s officers and men were cognizant of the allegations in the media that Malacaņang handed out bribes purportedly to allow Ms Arroyo to escape a fresh impeachment attempt.
“We’re aware (of the issue) from what we see and hear in the media. But we don’t feel any serious impact on the Army,” Torres said in a phone interview.
Dolorfino said that not only would the “enemies of the state” benefit from another military uprising, it would also most likely spark a “civil war.”
‘Let’s not take a gamble’
“A civil war is not remote if the AFP gets involved. That is the main reason why we should remain solid and neutral at all times,” Dolorfino said.
Asked why a military uprising this time could turn bloody, compared to the peaceful People Power Revolts in 1986 and 2001, Dolorfino replied: “Let’s not take a gamble. The next time could lead to a civil war. It’s difficult if people with guns are involved.”
Dolorfino said that had then Marine commandant Brig. Gen. Artemio Tadiar not been a professional, there could have been a “bloody confrontation” during the 1986 EDSA Revolution that ousted the dictator Ferdinand Marcos.
Tadiar led the Marine contingent with tanks and armored trucks but refused to fire at the thousands of people, including priests and nuns, that blocked its way to Camps Aguinaldo and Crame held by rebellious soldiers.
“It could have become a bloody confrontation between the pro-government and antigovernment forces so we cannot take chances as far as the use of military force is concerned,” Dolorfino said.