New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,305
    #1
    http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquire...-Nobel-boycott

    PH hit on Nobel boycott

    Human rights activists shocked

    Philippine Daily Inquirer
    First Posted 00:09:00 12/10/2010

    Filed Under: Human Rights, Awards and Prizes, Foreign affairs & international relations, Government, Trade (general), Diplomacy

    Most Read
    Other Most Read Stories x

    News
    o PH hit on Nobel boycott
    o Who's staying away from Nobel peace ceremony
    o Aquino slams SC decision
    o The President’s advisers are legal pygmies
    o Winner of P741-M lotto jackpot surfaces to claim prize
    o Ampatuan patriarch offered P50-M bribe to jail warden–DILG chief
    o Aquino to media: I will ‘hide and hide’ my romantic life
    o POC bats for football match between PH, Indonesia in Bacolod City
    o Japan team says stem cells made paralysed monkey jump again
    o Stay cool, Lagman advises President
    News Most Read RSS
    Close this

    MANILA, Philippines—Human rights activists and lawmakers were shocked and disappointed at the Philippine government’s decision to align with China in boycotting the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony honoring imprisoned Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo.

    “The Philippines prides itself on its democratic values, which is why it is shocking to see this government turning its back on Liu Xiaobo’s nonviolent struggle for free expression in China,” Elaine Pearson, deputy director for Asia of The Human Rights Watch, said in a statement.

    Pearson noted that President Benigno Aquino III’s mother, the late democracy icon Corazon Aquino, was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, the same year she led the peaceful People Power Revolution that ousted Marcos.

    The Philippines declined the invitation to attend Friday’s ceremony in Oslo, Norway.

    Pearson said skipping the ceremony along with 17 other countries, including China’s allies such as Venezuela and Cuba, regional neighbors including Vietnam and Kazakhstan, and business partners such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, meant that the Philippines “is failing to live up to its promise to promote human rights in Asia.”

    Calling the Department of Foreign Affairs’ decision disappointing, Akbayan party-list Rep. Walden Bello said he would write letters of protest to both the DFA and the Chinese Embassy in Manila.

    “We protest if the US tries to pressure us. I think we should equally protest when the Chinese do so. We should not let this superpower slap us around,” Bello said.

    He noted that human rights had been central in the struggle against the Marcos dictatorship and for democracy. “This has been institutionalized,” he said.

    Caving in

    Bello believed that the DFA caved in to China’s pressure. “This person is a human rights activist with a great record,” he said of Liu. “What the Chinese did was an awful pressure for us not to attend.”

    The DFA refused to say whether Beijing, a key trading partner, had pressured Manila to stay away from the event.

    DFA spokesperson Eduardo Malaya confirmed that no Philippine representative would attend the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony.

    Malaya said Manila’s envoy to Oslo, Elizabeth Buencuceso, was out of Norway on an official consular mission. “Our ambassador to Norway has a scheduling conflict,” he said.

    However, two senior government officials who did not want to be named said the move was meant to appease China, which had repeatedly warned governments around the world that ties would be harmed if they attended the ceremony.

    China reacted furiously to the decision by the Nobel committee to award this year’s peace prize to Liu, who was jailed for 11 years last December on subversion charges after calling for the reform of one-party communist rule.

    “We do not want to further annoy China,” said a senior diplomat at the DFA, who asked not to be named.

    Avoiding irritant

    A Malacañang official said President Aquino “did not want another irritant” in Manila’s ties with Beijing.

    The Philippines has been working hard to repair diplomatic ties with China following the botched rescue of a bus hijacking in Manila that left eight Hong Kong tourists dead in August.

    Chinese Ambassador to Manila Liu Jianchao said China appreciated the “understanding shown by the Philippine government” in joining the boycott of the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony.

    “We will say the move of the Philippines indicates the understanding of the Philippine government toward the stand of the Chinese government and people,” Liu said in a chance interview at the DFA.

    Foreign Secretary Alberto Romulo, interviewed at the same event, was tight-lipped, declining to comment on the Philippine move.

    “We will see, because it’s still Dec. 10... We will see, after tomorrow, or tomorrow, OK?” he told reporters.

    Blow to free expression

    Harry Roque, chair of the Manila-based Center for International Law, an advocacy group promoting human rights, said the Philippine decision was a blow to the cause of free expression.

    “The last thing the Philippines should be known for is as a supporter to the repressive policies of the Chinese government,” Roque said.

    Deputy Speaker Lorenzo Tañada III said he was “saddened” by the government’s decision not to send a representative to the awarding ceremony, but doubted that this diminished the country’s image as a democracy.

    Tightrope

    In Southeast Asia, the Philippines has been one of the most vocal governments in calling for the return of democracy in military-ruled Burma (Myanmar).

    A staunch US ally and host to hundreds of American counterterrorism troops in Mindanao, the Philippine government has walked a tightrope in its relations with increasingly assertive China.

    Beijing has been investing in the Philippines, particularly in infrastructure projects, but the two countries are also facing off in hotly disputed South China Sea islands, where the United States is promoting the peaceful resolution of territorial disputes.
    Trade between the countries has been expanding since the 1990s, with China now the Philippines’ third largest trading partner next to the United States and Japan. With reports from AFP, DJ Yap and TJ Burgonio
    Last edited by ghosthunter; December 10th, 2010 at 12:37 PM.

  2. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    25,039
    #2
    Hmm...this came out a few days ago. I guess ito yung kapalit for not attending. Beggars can't be choosers.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11933849

    7 December 2010 Last updated at 05:39 GMT
    Philippines and China to sign first military deal
    By Kate McGeown
    BBC News, Manila

    The Philippines, one of America's staunchest allies in South-East Asia, is due to agree a deal with China to supply it with military hardware.

    The head of the Philippine armed forces is in Beijing to sign what has been described as a "very substantial" agreement.

    A military spokesman denied that the move marked a shift in alliance from the US to China.

    But this is seen as another sign of China's expanding reach in the region.

    The Philippines has one of the weakest militaries in East Asia, and is fighting long-running insurgencies with both Communist and Islamic rebels.

    It urgently needs equipment - a key part of its current stock is made up of second-hand assault rifles, boats and aircraft from the United States.

    American forces are also based in the country to help train local soldiers.

    Brig Gen Jose Mabanta, a spokesman for the Philippine military, has denied that this new deal will change his country's relations with Washington.

    But the US has already expressed concern over China's arms sales and donations to its weaker neighbours - and a congressional report last year warned of the dangers of China's expanding military reach.

    The deal also highlights the change in China's stance, over the years, to the Philippines' Communist insurgency.

    When Philippine Communists originally set up the New People's Army in 1969, it was supported by Beijing.

    Now Philippine soldiers could be using Chinese equipment against them.
    Last edited by Monseratto; December 10th, 2010 at 11:49 AM.

  3. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,305
    #3
    mAY chinese blood ba si pnoy or tuta aya ng mga chinese? Ang galing nya makipag deal sa military ng chinese habang nagtatayo ang mga chinese ng lighthouse sa Spratley na sakop ng Pilipinas.

    May truth comission pa sya nalalaman pero pinaboran sya sa mga human rights abuser na china.

  4. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,940
    #4
    E ganun na nga talaga siguro yun, kapit bahay natin yan na superpower, may atraso pa tayo dahil sa hostage drama, matuto tayo makisama.

    The toes you step on today might be attached to the ass you may have to kiss tomorrow.


    Dati sunud sunuran tayo sa mga Kano, tuta tayo ng kano, ngayon na medyo binabraso tayo ng China at tumupi tayo tuta naman tayo ng China, e parehong superpower yan, either or lang yan. Di naman pwede na mag sarili tayo dapat may big brother tayong papanigan. Sala sa init sala sa lamig.
    Last edited by oliver1013; December 10th, 2010 at 11:57 AM.

  5. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    25,039
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by jonski View Post
    mAY chinese blood ba si pnoy or tuta aya ng mga chinese? Ang galing nya makipag deal sa military ng chinese habang nagtatayo ang mga chinese ng lighthouse sa Spratley na sakop ng Pilipinas.

    May truth comission pa sya nalalaman pero pinaboran sya sa mga human rights abuser na china.
    The truth is hard to accept. The AFP has to practically beg for donations from richer countries. Again Beggars can't be choosers. Nothing is free in this world, lahat may kapalit... Even those politicians complaining should be careful, baka di na sila makabakasyon sa Hong Kong.
    Last edited by Monseratto; December 10th, 2010 at 11:57 AM.

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    6,385
    #6
    Well, on the China Nobel prize issue, I don't think he had much of a choice. He's still pretty much butting heads with China for the hostage fiasco months back.

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    6,385
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by oliver1013 View Post
    The toes you step on today might be attached to the ass you may have to kiss tomorrow.
    Sad but true. Well put. Hehe!

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,093
    #8
    USA or China.

    Pick your poison.

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #9
    damage control

    para makalimot ang China sa palpak na gobyerno:rofl:
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  10. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,152
    #10
    the philippines has never been a country that could depend on themselves, and i suppose that it will never be able to stand alone, it could be recounted many years ago that US is targeting PH as its annex country like hawaii and guam, because of PH being persistent that it could stand by itself, pitfalls are deeper.

    there would definitely be disadvantages, like iran could bomb PH during wars because we are helpless but arent PH doomed from the start.

    with the current controversy, there would definitely be answers and surely damage control has to be made...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
PH hit on Nobel boycott