Sus ginagawa din yan sa kakampink businesses. Check niyo comments section ng mga nag-oout na kakampink. "idol kita dati pero unfollow na kita". Hindi lang cancel, red tagging pa. Ginawang NPA si Angel Locsin at Liza Soberano.
BAKIT KA BA GALIT SA LP?
Liberal Party nga ba ang dahilan ng pagkalugmok ng bansa? Tandaan nating si Marcos ay namumuno ng 21 years. In 1965 noong una siyang naging presidente,
tumakbo siya sa ilalim ng Nacionalista Party. In 1965 ang pinili na kandidato ng LP for president was Pres. Diosdado Macapagal who was running for reelection. Tinalo ni Marcos si Macapagal at nanalo ulit siya in his 1969 reelection bid against Sergio Osmena Jr of the Liberal party. So yong first 8 years ni Marcos na supposed to be matatapos in 1973 ay under Nacionalista party. Pero in 1972 nagdeklara na siya ng martial law at bumuo ng partido na Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL). Ito yong partido niya sa buong martial law years na puro lutong macao ang election dahil sa walang katapusang dayaan So ang NP/KBL ay may total na 21 years ng pamununo.
In 1986, ang LP ay sumama sa coalition na Unido/PDP Laban na tinakbuhan ni Cory for President in the 1986 snap election. Si Marcos was running under KBL. I voted for Cory-Doy Laurel. Excited ako dahil from 1972 onward, boykot ako. It was my first time to vote.
In 1992 tumakbo si Imelda Marcos for president under KBL pero ang LP candidate ay si Jovito Salonga at vice president niya si Nene Pimentel. Tinalo sila ni Fidel Ramos na tumakbo under LAKAS-NUCD at ang nanalong Vice Pres ay si Joseph Estrada under NPC na ang kandidato for president ay si Danding Cojuangco. In this fight, the closest candidate na nakalaban ni Ramos ay si Miriam Santiago under People's Reform Party. Sinampahan niya ng kaso ng pandaraya si Ramos pero dinismiss ito ng Supreme Court. I voted for Salonga-Pimentel. For me sila ang best tandem dahil parehong makabayan.
In 1998 ang kandidato ng LP for President ay si Alfredo Lim at vice niya si Serge Osmena. Natalo sila ni Joseph Estrada who run under her newly formed LAMMP party which was of course supported by Marcos. Ang nanalo for VP ay si Gloria Arroyo under Lakas na ang kandidato for Pres was Jose de Venecia. Ang termino ni Estrada na dapat until 2004 pa ay naputol dahil sa EDSA2 in 2001 at pumalit si Gloria Arroyo as president until 2004. I voted for Alfredo Lim-Osmena.
In the 2004 election walang kandidato ang LP. Nanalo si Gloria Arroyo under Lakas-Kampi at VP niya si Noli de Castro. First time in post martial law era na galing sa iisang partido ang presidente at VP niya. Pero ito yong pinakadikit na labanan for president. Tinalo ni Arroyo si Fernando Poe Jr of KNP by the slimmest of margin since the Ramos vs Santiago close fight in 1992.
Si Arroyo ang ibinoto ko at the last minute for the simple reason na ayaw kong manalo si FPJ. Pero ang first choice ko ay si Raul Roco kaso nagslowdown sa kampanya dahil sa sakit niya. Kaya malayo na siya sa mga huling survey. Nagsisisi ako sa botong yon.
In 2010, LP fielded Noynoy Aquino for President. He won but Roxas lost as VP to Jejomar Binay of UNA. Comebacking Joseph Estrada became Aquino's closest rival which was a shocking development. Ang inaakala ng marami ay si Manny Villar ang magiging kalaban ni Aquino dahil palagi itong nangunguna sa mga survey. Siempre Aquino-Roxas ako.
In 2016, LP fielded Mar Roxas for Pres and Leni Robredo for VP. Roxas lost for President but Robredo won as VP. Rodrigo Duterte won for Pres under PDP-Laban.
Summary:
In short hindi LP ang dahilan ng pagkalugmok at paghihirap ng bansa. Kung ano man ang kalagayan ngayon, iba-bang klaseng pamumuno ang dahilan. Maliwanag na ang LP President ay iisa lang, si Noy Aquino. Noy's term as president was considered the best years ever if we base it on all economic indicators and world competitive indexes. Cory Aquino also has some trace of LP dahil officially ang LP was part of the 1986 UNIDO/PDP Laban coalition. Both Aquinos are the only presidents na walang isyu ng katiwalian o pandarambong. Si Ramos may Centennial Park at PEA-Amari issue. Si Erap, alam na natin yong jueteng at Velarde account. Si Arroyo PDAF at Jose Pidal issue. Si Cory kahit isang isyu ng pangungurakot, wala. Si Pnoy wala rin. Yong DAP issue was more on the constitutionality ng programa. Sabi ng Supreme Court it was unconstititional but done in good faith. Ginamit kasi yong savings para palakasin ang ekonomiya after ng Yolanda devastation. Kinurakot daw ang Yolanda? Kahit isang kaso walang naisampa laban diyan. Katunayan nakakuha sila ng clearance sa mga government agencies sina Roxas, Aquino at Soliman at nakapagretire ng maayos at nakuha ang kanilang pension. Katunayan na malinis sila. At may extra fund pa na ginamit ni Duterte sa rehab ng Marawi.
Pinasasama lang ang imahe ng LP ng mga fake news na sinadyang pinapapakalat sa pamamagitan ng social media. Halatang fully funded ang demolition squad laban sa LP to the point na pati si Leni Robredo ay tumakbong independent para lang madis-associate sa LP. Ganon kasama ang epekto ng fake news sa bansa natin. Ang mahuhusay at magagaling pilit na pinapasama. Ang mga palpak ay pilit na pinapabango. Facebook
Almost all surveys lamang si BBM, ilang days nalang para bumawi si Leni. Kelangan kumatok ng triple,if laging binabalewala yan ng kampo ni Leni, malamang talunan sa huli. May stastician siguro Si VP Leni, Im sure marami din mahilig sa Numbers mga tsikot members dito.
Sa family lahat kami professional
Father BBM
Mother BBM
2brother BBM
1 sister Leni
Me Leni
Wife BBM
Mahirap I convince mga Ilocano Voter na pumunta ke Leni
I tried once
Twice, baka magkasamaan lang ng loob. So be it.
Hopefully maraming BBM voter na tamarin sa eleksyon
I talk with a former boss of mine and he says that his heart is really for Robredo but his mind is telling him to vote for BBM since it makes good business sense voting for him.
Kung di ka talaga magtitiyagang i-verify yung mga viral na videos, you would think na totoo talaga. Too bad, a lot of people fall for it, hook and sinker.
Why most dynasties oppose a Robredo presidency
THE CORNER ORACLE - Andrew J. Masigan - The Philippine Star
April 27, 2022 | 12:00am
Dynasties monopolize political and economic power in both the local and national spheres. Is it unfair? Yes, because politi cal dynasties enjoy untold advantages that common citizen have no access to. Have dynasties worked to the country’s advantage? No, statistics show that dynasties retard development in their respective constituencies. Despite their negative effects, however, dynasties remain well entrenched in our political system.
Political dynasties have grown both in number and in “fat.” Fat dynasties occur when more than one family member sits as governor, vice governor, mayor, vice mayor, congressman and councilor simultaneously.
Fat dynasties have become more the rule than the exemption in our political system today. In the Senate, 16 out of the 24 members belong to dynasties. Seventy percent of Congress belongs to political clans. Meanwhile, 73 out of 81 governors belong to dynasties, as do 53 percent of all mayors. Make no mistake, dynasties will continue to fatten and monopolize power unless there is an enabling law to stop them.
Political analyst Cleve Arguelles intimated to The STAR that dynasties generally operate to keep their respective clans in power across administrations. It doesn’t matter if there is a misalignment in political ideology between the dynasty and the sitting president. Neither is it important that their agendas clash. Dynasties are typically willing to compromise since theirs is a “family business” where the idea is to keep the enterprise going for as long as possible. For most, what matters is access to the president and exemption from persecution. The president holds both the power of the purse and the full force of the executive branch, after all.
This is why it is common for dynasties to switch allegiances every six years. While detestable, society accepts it to its peril. Beneath their patronizing words towards the president (whoever it may be) is unabashed opportunism. Dynasties exemplify political survivalism at its crudest. This may not be true for all, but certainly the majority.
An Oxford Development Study concluded that government units led by dynasties register higher poverty rates, lower human development indices and lower economic competitiveness compared to independently governed LGUs. This is because mechanisms for horizontal accountability (where one office checks and balances the other) are virtually non-existent. Dynasties override institutions and weaken them over time.
The study further states that the centralization of power to one clan leads to poor policy formation. This is because the preservation of power is the priority, even more important than social and economic development itself. Painful reforms and unpopular decisions are avoided as they erode political equity. Adoption of populist policies becomes the norm at the cost of stunted development.
Dynasties corner rent seeking industries on the back of their political and economic sway. It is common for local government officials to control power distribution, transportation franchises, water distribution, mining, infrastructure, construction and real estate development in their respective bailiwicks. Not only does this deprive the business community of a fair opportunity to compete, it also exacerbates income inequality.
Mind you, cornering rent seeking industries happens in both the national and local levels and the statistics validate its effect on income inequality. Pre-pandemic data show that only 40 families control 76 percent of the economy or roughly P13.7 trillion worth of economic output per year. Tax records further show that only 489 families have a net worth of P1.5 billion or more, many of them political families. A total of 250 families control the political affairs of the country.
In contrast, 58.4 million of our countrymen are made to live on a daily income of only P779 or less. The extent of income inequality in the Philippines is the most acute in ASEAN, as proven by our Gini coefficient of 41.58. We are also the 4th most crony-capitalist economy in the world.
The Marcoses and Dutertes are themselves dynasties. They are supported by the Arroyos, the Estradas and the Romualdezes, all of whom are dynasties too. And since the Marcos-Duterte UniTeam is leading in the polls, numerous dynasties across the archipelago have pledged their support for political survivalism.
Given the composition and background of the UniTeam, it is highly unlikely that the Anti-Political Dynasty Bill will see the light of day despite it being mandated by the 1987 Constitution. Thus, a vote for Marcos is a vote for political dynasties.
The antithesis of a dynasty is Leni Robredo. Robredo is the only member of her family serving in government today. She maintains a strong anti-political dynasty position with every intention of leveling the political playing field if elected. The specter of losing their economic and political advantages is the reason why entrenched dynasties are doing all they can to foil a Robredo presidency.
While in Congress, VP Leni was the vice chairman of the House committees on good governance and public accountability. There, she co-authored the Anti-Political Dynasty Bill, the Freedom of Information Act and supported the Anti Political Turncoat Law.
Participatory governance and transparency are at the core of VP Leni’s values. Robredo authored the Full Disclosure Policy Bill, which mandates all government agencies and their sub-units to disclose their budget and financial transactions without need for request.
She also authored the People Empowerment Bill, which seeks to allow more public participation in decision and policy-making; the Participatory Budget Process Bill, which seeks to increase participation in budget-related decisions in government; and the Tax Incentives Management and Transparency Act to promote transparency in the taxation process.
If elected, Robredo will do everything in her power to enact the Anti-Political Dynasty Bill and other transparency-related laws despite strong resistance from the legislature. Thus, a vote for Robredo is a vote against political dynasties.
Whether we want political dynasties to persist or desist is a personal choice. A vote for Marcos or Robredo will determine the fate of dynasties as we move forward.
Q: Assuming that the elections are held tomorrow,
who among the following will get your vote for
PRESIDENT? (Comparative Over Time, Geographical, Economic Class)
Q: Which of the following best describes the
likelihood that you will change your vote for
PRESIDENT?
Q: Suppose that your first choice is no longer
running for president or is disqualified, whom would you choose instead?
According to Publicus, they would release another 2 surveys (NCR, National).