Impeachment against CJ Corona..

[chua_riwap]

^ atty....di ka ba um-attend ng prayer vigil?
busy ka ngayon ah..........

[glenn manikis]

The representatives who impeached Corona are the very ones guilty of the crime they accused him of. And yet we let them scott-free? Ganito ba ang gobyerno? Ang matuwid binabaluktot ang baluktot tinutuwid?

isang KATUTAK ANG MGA kaso nila sa ombudsman, lower court at Suprme Court... from graft and corruption to violence against women and children... serious physical detention, grave abuse of authority....etc. etc...

[[archie]]

^^ then let them have their day in court. Yun ang mahirap eh. Dadamay na kung meron na nahuli sayo. You are nothing better than a rat. Put together a complanit againts them. Para lang sakin, take down the ones on top first to send a message that no one is untouchable.

If everyone is doing it, it does not follow na its right. At least the government is trying one by one to eliminate the bad seeds.

[111prez]

the real question that should be asked is not whether or not corona will be impeached but rather has the prosecution proven its case for impeachment

if one believes that the prosecution has proven its case, then impeachment is a triumph of justice

but if the prosecution has not proven its case yet corona is impeached, then it is all a mere political game

one wins a case not the the weakness of the evidences of the other side but on the strength of your own evidences

this is an age old maxim in law

and, the senator-judges are supposed to be neither for the prosecution or the defense

[glenn manikis]

the real question that should be asked is not whether or not corona will be impeached but rather has the prosecution proven its case for impeachment

if one believes that the prosecution has proven its case, then impeachment is a triumph of justice

but if the prosecution has not proven its case yet corona is impeached, then it is all a mere political game

one wins a case not the the weakness of the evidences of the other side but on the strength of your own evidences

this is an age old maxim in law

and, the senator-judges are supposed to be neither for the prosecution or the defense

jpe i think as a lawyer would based his decision on the evidence presented.... as a lawyer it would be his legacy....

[JackFlash]

“Is Corona morally fit to remain as chief justice of the Supreme Court? The damning revelations go to the very core. Pagkatao ang pinaguusapan natin dito,” lead prosecutor Iloilo Rep. Niel Tupas Jr. said.

Question: Are the Congressmen who signed the impeachment complaint clean enough to accuse him of the crime they themselves are guilty of? Those who plea for justice must come in court with clean hands.

May mga kaso ng katiwalian ang buong angkan ni Tupaz na nasa Ombudsman at SC kaya yan nagkakaganyan.

So based on this argument, if one gets pulled over for a traffic violation and is about to get issued a ticket, puede pala niyang tanungin yung enforcer, "Habang naka-duty ka, ikaw ba'y hinding-hindi sumalubong sa 1-way street? Ikaw ba'y hinding-hindi nagpatakbo ng sasakyan habang pula ang ilaw? Ikaw ba'y laging naka-helmet kapag nagmo-motor?"

Then, we really don't need courts, lawyers, plaintiffs, defendants and judges after all, right?

[glenn manikis]

It is better to see a leader who deliver results rather than a leader whose popularity is kept afloat by his blue-sky promises that never gain ground. The Supreme Court under the leadership of CJ Corona initiated reforms in the conduct of the bar exams, decongested clogged dockets of the courts, and rendered decisions upholding the rights of the farmers. What about PNoy who does nothing but to pass the buck on his predecessor, flaunts his showbiz politics on media, and cares nothing about the declining economy.

Even a common man of reasonable mind would know the difference between the two except those of course who blindly follows the yellow propaganda and marches with their yellow president towards the yellow path.

[[archie]]

Para sayo, its ok na lumabag ang cj ng batas basta may ginagawa siya sa puesto niya? Wow, just wow.

[glenn manikis]

Para sayo, its ok na lumabag ang cj ng batas basta may ginagawa siya sa puesto niya? Wow, just wow.

ano po ba ang labag sa batas na ginawa ni cj para ma impeach cya? is it an impeachable offence? meron po bang kaso ng anti graft na nakasampa sakanya sa ombudsman o sa impeachment court? ano at saan cya nagnakaw? non declaration nalang po halos ang pinagtatalunan ngayon.... lahat naman po nasagot na ni CJ... ni ang prosecution nag waive na ng cross nila.... ayaw na din nila gamitin ang waiver.... pwede naman nila gamitin yun sa rebuttal but.... they did not... why?

alam nyo po kung may mali o nag nagnakaw po sa kaban ng bayan si CJ kami po dito ang unanang unang makakaalam at lahat po ng papeles eh dumadaan sa emplyedo... kami po dito sa JUDICIARY will not tolerate the CJ... like what we did to CJ Davide... the employees was the one who initiated the filling of the impeachment complaint against DAVIDE... halos lahat po kami sa judiciary anti GMA....

[[archie]]

ano po ba ang labag sa batas na ginawa ni cj para ma impeach cya? is it an impeachable offence? meron po bang kaso ng anti graft na nakasampa sakanya sa ombudsman o sa impeachment court? ano at saan cya nagnakaw? non declaration nalang po halos ang pinagtatalunan ngayon.... lahat naman po nasagot na ni CJ... ni ang prosecution nag waive na ng cross nila.... ayaw na din nila gamitin ang waiver.... pwede naman nila gamitin yun sa rebuttal but.... they did not... why?

alam nyo po kung may mali o nag nagnakaw po sa kaban ng bayan si CJ kami po dito ang unanang unang makakaalam at lahat po ng papeles eh dumadaan sa emplyedo... kami po dito sa JUDICIARY will not tolerate the CJ... like what we did to CJ Davide... the employees was the one who initiated the filling of the impeachment complaint against DAVIDE... halos lahat po kami sa judiciary anti GMA....

Ika nga ni enrile, ano ba mali kung disclose niya dollar niya. No court would file a case kung nilagay niya sa saln. Bakit kailangan itago? Bakit nagwaive sa cross is beyond me dahil hindi ako prosecution, much more, not a lawyer. Sa pananaw ko, kung walang tinatago, hindi kailangan magtago.

Nasagot niya, pero tama na palusot lang lahat. Babanat ng waiver pero kailangan sign din yung iba. Babanat ng walang condition at the last minute. Bumibira lang para humaba... Dami dahilan pero wala evidence to support, only credibility at best.

It does not follow na kung ang buong sc employees are not against the cj, wala siya ginawang mali.

hindi ba nasa article 2 ang basis ng kaso, included as articles of impeachment?

[explorer]

kala ko si thief justice lang gustong magpalusot...mga tuta pala nya parang idol din nila

[chua_riwap]

ano po ba ang labag sa batas na ginawa ni cj para ma impeach cya? is it an impeachable offence? meron po bang kaso ng anti graft na nakasampa sakanya sa ombudsman o sa impeachment court? ano at saan cya nagnakaw? non declaration nalang po halos ang pinagtatalunan ngayon.... lahat naman po nasagot na ni CJ... ni ang prosecution nag waive na ng cross nila.... ayaw na din nila gamitin ang waiver.... pwede naman nila gamitin yun sa rebuttal but.... they did not... why?

alam nyo po kung may mali o nag nagnakaw po sa kaban ng bayan si CJ kami po dito ang unanang unang makakaalam at lahat po ng papeles eh dumadaan sa emplyedo... kami po dito sa JUDICIARY will not tolerate the CJ... like what we did to CJ Davide... the employees was the one who initiated the filling of the impeachment complaint against DAVIDE... halos lahat po kami sa judiciary anti GMA....

pa'no yan glenn....di luhaan ka?
mag-impake ka na. sama mo si midas.......

[tsupermario]

sabi nga ni lakay farinas less than 2% lang ng actual net worth ni CJ ang naka-declare sa kanyang SALN. hindi na 'good faith' yan. palusot!

[LeBRONghini6]

I think ngayon palang dapat maconvict na. Dahil kung may ibang kaso eh pwede naman syang sampahan ng criminal cases eh. Kesa ma acquit sya di natin alam ang pwedeng mangyari dahil mananaitli syang CJ.

[shadow]

I agree lahat dapat mag sign ng waiver BUT now is not the place and time...after ma convict si corona then let's go after the others. siya nakasalang ngayon eh tapos ipapasa sa iba...ano siya swerte. mangdadamay pa? hahaha

Filipinos kept on asking for accountability from their leaders and when one is being held accountable, we now questions the motive...labo niyo!

[tsupermario]

I agree lahat dapat mag sign ng waiver BUT now is not the place and time...after ma convict si corona then let's go after the others. siya nakasalang ngayon eh tapos ipapasa sa iba...ano siya swerte. mangdadamay pa? hahaha

agree. kelangan ng precedent

[niwde11]

agree. kelangan ng precedent

it wont happen. mahirap nga satin pag may precedent nagiging complacent na tayo. i agree with 111prez. ang problema sa pinas ay ang pag gawa ng batas. tama si mirriam dati. time to dissolved congress. they are inefficient, self serving, etc. gastusin na lang ngatin sa ibang bagay. it maybe harsh but we need harsh decision. nagbigay pa nga lang ng memo ang CSC re: sa new saln procedures e nag cross party lines na lahat ng cocgresman eh pag angal. what more sa waiver. it wont happen unless protected na mga assets nila. wala namang masama siguro kung isabay yung waiver na yan kahit me impeachment pa. mahirap yata mag pajudge sa isang taong di naman kaya gawin ang kanyang pinpreach. sabi nga nung isang kolumnista dati, "di ko irereport ang mga babaero for some obvious reason".

[shadow]

before technicalities nagtatago ngayon naman sa walang kamatayan. "those who have not sinned, cast the first stone"...pag ganyan pala eh di alisin na lang SC...wala ng makukulong sa criminals

[111prez]

the problem with the SALN law is that this was legislated/written by those who precisely have something to hide

time for all public officials to take the moral high ground

[111prez]

baka aatakehin sa puso sa sobrang tuwa si corona pag ma acquit kaya manatili pa rin sya sa medical city

herherher