New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines



View Poll Results: Senate's verdict on CJ

Voters
69. You may not vote on this poll
  • Guilty!

    58 84.06%
  • Not Guilty

    9 13.04%
  • i couldn't care less

    2 2.90%
Page 182 of 421 FirstFirst ... 82132172178179180181182183184185186192232282 ... LastLast
Results 1,811 to 1,820 of 4205
  1. Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,828
    #1811
    Quote Originally Posted by Retz View Post
    sa AMLC galing ang Annex A? abswelto na ba si "little lady"?
    Kung may kumanta. Otherwise Senate should move on, nalilihis na eh.

    Ang natumbok lang ni Marcos kanina eh... Since naireport ng AMLC na walang PEP marking yung mga signature cards during the Audit at ang Annex that was presented eh meron... Meaning the annex did not came from AMLC.

  2. Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,828
    #1812
    Ang laking wow mali kay Joker to.

    BSP denies it leaked Corona's accounts | ABS-CBN News

    PSBank President is really trying hard to deflect the source of the document away from them. Even to the point of saying that AMLC audited them and pointing finger to Jerry Leal, which turned out to be not a member of AMLC but of BSP.

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    26,770
    #1813
    Just a query, Why is there 42 discrepancies in Annex A if it is a faithful reproduction of the original? Will the senate look into the document from AMLC and BSP just to compare it from Annex A? Nalilihis na talaga.... but Senate wants to settle this issue and get the bottomline of this. Natatagalan na tayo dito sa article 2. Gusto ko na marinig article 3.

  4. Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    22,967
    #1814
    Pustahan papatawag ng Imspitment court yung taga AMLC at iproduce yung kopya nila...Pagkatapos pa ng Holy Week yung susunod na Article.

  5. Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,828
    #1815
    Quote Originally Posted by Retz View Post
    Just a query, Why is there 42 discrepancies in Annex A if it is a faithful reproduction of the original? Will the senate look into the document from AMLC and BSP just to compare it from Annex A? Nalilihis na talaga.... but Senate wants to settle this issue and get the bottomline of this. Natatagalan na tayo dito sa article 2. Gusto ko na marinig article 3.
    Di na dapat nila push yan, nawawala na sila sa kaso eh. Tsaka hindi document at signature expert ang President ng PSBank.

    Ibang forum na dapat yan Annex issue na yan. Wala nang kinalaman sa kaso yan eh.

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,872
    #1816
    Quote Originally Posted by Retz View Post
    Just a query, Why is there 42 discrepancies in Annex A if it is a faithful reproduction of the original? Will the senate look into the document from AMLC and BSP just to compare it from Annex A? Nalilihis na talaga.... but Senate wants to settle this issue and get the bottomline of this. Natatagalan na tayo dito sa article 2. Gusto ko na marinig article 3.
    It's hard to say without examining the original, but from experience, the discrepancies could be markings made by whoever the custodian of the record is. What's not being explored or considered further is whether or not the signature appearing on the document presented by the prosecution and the one in custody of the bank is genuine.

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    26,770
    #1817
    Quote Originally Posted by Altis6453 View Post
    It's hard to say without examining the original, but from experience, the discrepancies could be markings made by whoever the custodian of the record is. What's not being explored or considered further is whether or not the signature appearing on the document presented by the prosecution and the one in custody of the bank is genuine.

    That is why sen. judge Lacson is suggesting that this be examined by handwriting experts from PNP or NBI. But presiding officer declined it ang prosekusyon daw ang dapat gumawa niyan. But then again, hindi daw ito evidence ng prosecution. ang gulo.

  8. Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    3,221
    #1818
    Quote Originally Posted by Retz View Post
    TBut then again, hindi daw ito evidence ng prosecution. ang gulo.
    so does that means lahat ng lumabas sa particular evidence na yan ay inadmissible in the impeachment court?

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    26,770
    #1819
    Quote Originally Posted by niwde11 View Post
    so does that means lahat ng lumabas sa particular evidence na yan ay inadmissible in the impeachment court?

    From what I understand, ung Annex A supplemental document lang un na naka attach sa subpoena. Prosecution did not mark it as their evidence. Kaya nga they are discussing this Annex A na irrelevant naman kasi hindi ito ni offer ng prosecution as evidence. Tama ba pagkaintindi ko coder?

  10. Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    3,221
    #1820
    Quote Originally Posted by Retz View Post
    From what I understand, ung Annex A supplemental document lang un na naka attach sa subpoena. Prosecution did not mark it as their evidence. Kaya nga they are discussing this Annex A na irrelevant naman kasi hindi ito ni offer ng prosecution as evidence. Tama ba pagkaintindi ko coder?
    lawyer ba coder? baka kay altis6453 mo tinatanong?

Impeachment against CJ Corona..