Federal vs Parliamentary vs Presidential... Which is better?

**skyglider** · May 4th, 2018 01:11 PM

I've been reading about these forms of government. Most developed or first-world countries (Swiss, Japan, UK, SG) have adopted Parliamentary type of government.

Our politicians are against Charter Change and shifting to Federal from Presidential. Which do you think would suit us better?

**shadow** · May 4th, 2018 01:17 PM

Not the system but the people running it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**yebo** · May 4th, 2018 01:28 PM

Originally Posted by shadow

Not the system but the people running it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yuuuuuuup! it's rhe same corrupt people again and again.

we need another revolution. and next time it needs to be bloody. for as long as the corrupt get away with their loot their children will follow and do worse. then and only then can you start anew.

**carwhacko** · May 4th, 2018 02:04 PM

Pano ba maiiwasan or mababawasan ang corruption? What if nawala na lahat ng corrupt individuals sa government tapos may mga pumalit sure ba tayo na hindi na sila magiging corrupt?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**Mguy** · May 4th, 2018 03:04 PM

Federalism? In a place na uso ang nepotism sa probinsya and private armies? It would be a disaster.

I'm more for Parliamentary because it is easier to change the government should it falter.

**KingoftheNorth** · May 4th, 2018 03:59 PM

Originally Posted by Mguy

Federalism? In a place na uso ang nepotism sa probinsya and private armies? It would be a disaster.

I'm more for Parliamentary because it is easier to change the government should it falter.

IIRC, parliament is merely dissolved and reformed later with new elections. If it's the same clowns in Congress coming into power over and over again, we have a problem since all they do is musical chairs. Baka dapat pa one-shot deal types of elections or positions with no chance of reelection whatsoever to get rid of the bad apples and to give younger and fresher faces a chance to do better.

**Wh1stl3r** · May 4th, 2018 04:13 PM

Need to put pressure on corrupt pols. Name and shame them for any conspicuous luxury they consume in all forms of media every day. Make it impossible for them to enjoy the fruits of our labor.

Maybe we should have TMZ here. But only to harass pols, not celebrities.

**kisshmet** · May 4th, 2018 04:43 PM

Originally Posted by KingoftheNorth

IIRC, parliament is merely dissolved and reformed later with new elections. If it's the same clowns in Congress coming into power over and over again, we have a problem since all they do is musical chairs. Baka dapat pa one-shot deal types of elections or positions with no chance of reelection whatsoever to get rid of the bad apples and to give younger and fresher faces a chance to do better.

revising the constitution paves the way for the return of glory to power

dutertes old..glory is bored in congress

the current constitution isnt perfect but good enough just amend the economic provisions to open the gates to foreign investments

Sent from my SM-G532G using Tapatalk

**KingoftheNorth** · May 4th, 2018 04:46 PM

Originally Posted by kisshmet

revising the constitution paves the way for the return of glory to power

dutertes old..glory is bored in congress

Sent from my SM-G532G using Tapatalk

Not really sure what you mean by this.

How does "glory to power" come about and what does it mean for the people?