I tell you frankly, we are better off not knowing each other.
You read again my post. Did I use the word "READILY" or the word "IMMEDIATELY"?You assumed I readily believed trillanes about Binay? When trillanes had an expose with VP binay I did not immediately believe him. It was the ospital ng makati overpriced purchase of medical beds and supplies that convinced me that he is corrupt. And it also helps that I know few people in osmak. And it also helps that I watch the senate investigation. It took awhile before I believed all those allegation against Binay as true.
Why would I not? We have the same cause as Senator Trilllanes. We belong to the same party. Yes, I am bias to him. You, you are nothing but blindly bias to Mayor Duterte. That is all there is to it. Do you understand?If you believe that excel-form paper without bank signature nor bank heading nor bank confirmation, its your decision not mine. Ask yourself if you are not bias. As for me, Ill wait for more evidence before jumping into conclusion.
so duterte changed his mind? or just his spokeperson?
Leading presidential candidate Rodrigo Duterte is considering filing charges against Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV for his claims that the tough-talking Davao City mayor did not declare P211 million in his statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN).
In a statement to the media on Thursday, Peter Laviña, Duterte’s spokesperson, said the mayor’s legal experts are looking into possible cases that can be filed against Trillanes.
Read more: Duterte mulls raps vs Trillanes over allegations on SALN | Inquirer News
Follow us: *inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
Not his spokesperson.
And how in the world is this possible?“Not anymore. I’ll make it difficult for Trillanes. It’s just a piece of paper. You prove it. Why will I give it to him? I’ll take the waiver and I will tell him, ‘Prove it. I will not make it easy for you. I will not play into your hands. You prove it,’” Duterte told reporters in a mix of Filipino and English in an ambush interview on the sidelines of the Presidential Dialogue with the Makati Business Club on Wednesday.
Para sa pag babago.“Maniwala kayo (Believe me). That’s garbage. You can check with the bank. You go there,” said Duterte.![]()
i agree with you on this one, bok. at this time where nothing seems to bring down digong (the mainstream media call him a teflon candidate) and it seems the presidency is his for the taking, trillanes' expose is too late. also, if this is not true, trillanes is taking a huge gamble, practically putting his neck on the line-- by doing that, he is earning the ire of the president-in-waiting, who is allegedly notorious to take the law into his own hands.
investigative journalism
meanwhile
Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte on Thursday confirmed that he has a BPI (Bank of the Philippine Islands) account on Julia Vargas Avenue in Pasig City.
The presidential aspirant challenged Vice Presidential bet Antonio Trillanes IV to execute an affidavit on how and where he obtained the data claiming that Duterte has more than P200 million in the BPI account.
READ: Trillanes: Duterte didn’t declare P211M in SALN | Duterte mulls raps vs Trillanes over allegations on SALN
Duterte said two of his accounts only have about P50,000 and P17,500 contrary to Trillanes’ claim
Read more: Duterte admits existence of BPI account | Inquirer News
Follow us: *inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
Biglang umamin meron account. [emoji23]
Wala pa yata Kahit isang challenge tinaggap itong si duts. Puro kwenta lang na nag challenge daw siya ng gun duel.
Oh dutertards May 2 daw 11 am sa BPI Julia Vargas branch magkita kayo ni trillanes. Parating niyo naman kay duts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
noitimed, leodev. I'm sorry guys but your views on Trillanes expose are so naive.
1. Let's have a review of some relatively recent events.
a. Corona trial. A little lady sent a congressman transaction details of Corona bank accounts. Source remained nameless. Details were sent to Ombudsman. Ombudsman requested AMLC for information. Leaked information was verified to be accurate.
b. Binay. Trillanes gave a list of Binay's bank accounts. His source remained anonymous. It's now with Ombudsman. If Binay lose, he will be in jail. Leaked information, again, was verified to be accurate.
c. Duterte. Trillanes gave a list of transactions. His source will remain anonymous. It will be forwarded to Ombudsman, etc.. They just denied the existence of the accounts and if caught, they will come out with excuses, as what Binay and Corona did.
These are just the accounts under Duterte's name.
See the pattern? It's how it's done. It will be that way now. Obviously, the source has to be protected as he/she may be indicted.
2. On the matter of timing. It is election related, no need to speculate. I don't see that as a problem. Aren't you glad people still have a chance to decide whether they still want to vote for Duterte? You cannot blame Trillanes on this, it looks like he was just given the information recently, you need to find somebody else to blame.
All Duterte has to do is sign a valid waiver, how hard is that?
Edit: Apparently, the account exists. A complete reversal of Duterte's spokesperson's statement yesterday. What's next? Honest mistake? We'll just amend the SALN?
Patunay lang yan na totoong may account sa Maynila si Duterte gaya ng sabi ni Sen. Trillanes na noong una tinatanggi pa ni Duterte, tapos ngayon lang niya i-confirm kasi alam niya mabubuking din siya.
Kitang-kita naman na deposit slip lang yan. Hindi naman kita riyan yung balance ng account para sabihing walang Php211 Million si Duterte na nakadeposito.
Sana tinanggap na lang ni Duterte yung hamon ni Trillanes sa bank secrecy waiver tutal sila ni Cayetano naman ang unang naghamon sa mga presidentiables na pumirma sa waiver, kundi ora-orada mismo napahiya si Trillanes pag nalamang wala naman pala si Duterte ganoong halagang tinatago sa bangko.
Eh ang nangyari, si Duterte pa mismo ang umatras, natakot at naduwag sa hamon, pahihirapan na lang niya raw si Trillanes. Eh kung si Duterte wala namang tinatago, bakit siya matatakot, dapat pa nga tinodo na niya para matahimik na si Trillanes, pero kabaligtaran ang nangyari.
Lumalabas tuloy na baka may tinatago nga si Duterte at ayaw mabuking. Kahit nga yung anak niyang si Sara, di lumabas agad para pabulaanan samantalang nung nag-viral yung rape comment, ambilis niya dumepensa sa ama niya, pero lumabas na parang nagsinungaling lang siyang na-rape dahil si Duterte mismo di naniniwalang na-rape ang anak niya.
Wala namang taong maniniwala sa sabi-sabi lang na ganito lang ang pera niya, dapat pakita ni Duterte na maliit lang ang halaga ng deposito niya sa bangko.
Saka, mag-isip din kayo, kung 50K at 17K lang ang pera niya sa dalawang account, bakit pa siya magbubukas ng account at idedeposito sa bangko sa Maynila samantalang may bangko rin naman sa Davao? Baka kaya binawi na niya yung waiver kasi ayaw niya malaman ng mga Dabawenyos ang tunay na yaman niya dahil "pro-poor image" ang pakita niya sa tao kaya malayo sa Davao niya idineposito.
This is getting interesting
GMA News Breaking *gmanewsbreaking 5m
Duterte to Trillanes: File formal affidavit first then I will make public my bank accounts.
edit: whats the affidavit for?
delay tactics? umaasa mag election na
Loving how my social feeds are so quiet about duterte now.
Roxas issued an affidavit.
Roxas calls Duterte ‘liar’ over bank account expose | Inquirer News
In front of the media, Roxas also signed the notarized affidavit of transparency authorizing the Office of the Ombudsman and the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to scrutinize all his accounts.
Roxas also waived all his rights and privileges to bank secrecy under the Bank Secrecy Law. The affidavit of transparency will cover all his accounts starting from the year he first assumed office in government.
Read more: Roxas calls Duterte ‘liar’ over bank account expose | Inquirer News
Follow us: *inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
Matapang talaga si Digong [emoji23][emoji23]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Si CJ Corona na impeached dahil sa hinde dineclare sa SALN yung $$$ account... Eh ito di rin dineclare yung BPI account. Ngayon lang inamin, tapos nag hahanap ng rason dahil maliit lang ang laman daw... It's still the law and no one is above it.