CBCP’s Cinema endorses ‘Breaking Dawn Part 2’ for its pro-life message

[shadow]

Alam ko Bakit nila endorse kasi pedophile din Si Edward...Akalain mo inasawa yun HS na babae eh Ang tanda na niya


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[foresterx]

out of all the movies they choose breaking dawn? the single movie that ****s up the minds of youths these days.

[ghosthunter]

they'll support anything that has a hint of pro-life

if it was a movie about Satan getting a girl pregnant and the girl wants to have the baby the CBCP will endorse it

Tingin mo support din nila ito?

[uls]

hehe

--

if it was a movie about a priest who gets an underage girl pregnant and the parents of the girl who are devout Catholics want their daughter to have the baby the CBCP will endorse it

[Manilablock]

they'll support anything that has a hint of pro-life

if it was a movie about Satan getting a girl pregnant and the girl wants to have the baby the CBCP will endorse it

Parang story ni Freddy Krueger yan ah..

Amanda Krueger was a nun working in a hospital, and was raped by over 100 psychopaths. She become pregnant with a son, who was named Freddy.
Freddy Krueger - Horror Film Wiki

[roninblade]

you thought i made that up?


Jesus was married! 'Proof' God spoke to his wife and Mary Magdalene found on ancient papyrus | Mail Online

If genuine, the document casts doubt on a centuries old official representation of Magdalene as a repentant whore and overturns the Christian ideal of ***ual abstinence.

i think you conveniently disregarded this just for the sake of argument. every source i found avoid saying anything conclusive so we shouldn't be jumping to conclusion, especially when the researchers are not even sure the authenticity of the evidence (which is a very tiny piece of paper). for all we know it was just a part of an ancient fanfic piece hehe.

;)

on topic, it's ok for the church to support anything remotely pro-life no matter how fscking crazy it is. but saying Jesus was married goes against the bible and is sacrilegious. that's what makes it blasphemous.

... and that is why i said, "have you thought about your argument much?"

[uls]

doesnt matter if proven or not

what matters is it's out there and it got a reaction from the Roman Catholic Church

Jesus's wife papyrus denounced by Vatican newspaper as a clumsy fake | World news | guardian.co.uk

The Vatican's daily newspaper has denounced as a "clumsy fake" an alleged 4th-century Coptic papyrus that suggests Jesus was a married man.

Karen King, a professor at Harvard divinity school, presented the ancient text at a conference in Rome last week, claiming it contained the words "Jesus said to them, 'my wife'", a possible reference to Mary Magdalene.

Christian tradition maintains that Jesus did not marry, a theory that underpins the Catholic church's insistence that priests remain single and celibate. The idea that Jesus did have children was most recently aired in Dan Brown's bestseller The Da Vinci Code.

[Monseratto]

on topic, it's ok for the church to support anything remotely pro-life no matter how fscking crazy it is. but saying Jesus was married goes against the bible and is sacrilegious. that's what makes it blasphemous.

... and that is why i said, "have you thought about your argument much?"

It took men 1000 years before they placed the stories of the bible in writing...

[yapoy86]

it does matter.. chismis kasi yan eh... being celibate refers to Paul who chose to serve instead of having family...

BTT: fiction lang naman yan eh...sa edad ni edward tingin nyo makakahanap pa ba sya ng mortal na kasing age nya?? kung meron man di ba panget tingnan yun sa batang bata tapos yung girl kulubot na... so humanap lang sya ng ka face level nya.. uso din naman yung high school pa lang eh binubuntis na...

[stickers]

OT: the argument roots from who made who.. Did God made man or did man made God?

BTT: It seems that the CBCP is slowly evolving out of their conservative ways...