New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,092
    #1
    lumalabas na kung sino nagsasabi ng totoo between the Mayors and Fernando....this just solidify the claims of the Mayors the MMDA has no authority to enforce new scheme w/o the Mayors approving it first...

    sampal yan sa mukha ni Fernando...


    Monday, June 16, 2008 The Court of Appeals (CA) struck down two orders of the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA), one imposing a single traffic ticketing system and the other tagging a motorist as a traffic violator without his knowledge.
    In a 14-page decision, the CA upheld a Makati court’s decision voiding MMDA Memorandum Circular No. 5 requiring a “no contact apprehension policy” on traffic violators for being contrary to the constitutional right to due process.
    The CA also voided the single-ticketing system for traffic violators on grounds that Chairman Bayani Fernando issued MMDA Memorandum Circular No. 4 without a resolution from the Metro Manila Council, as required by law.
    “Not infrequently, the government is tempted to take legal shortcuts to solve urgent problems of the people,” read the CA decision.
    “But even when government is armed with the best of intention, we cannot allow it to run roughshod over the rule of law. While we hold that the general welfare should be promoted, we stress that it should not be achieved at the expense of the rule of law.”
    In the MMDA’s “no contact apprehension policy,” digital cameras were issued to MMDA traffic enforcers to take pictures of traffic violators. The pictures will serve as basis for the issuance of a series of notices to the traffic violator, which details the violation and demands payment of a fine.
    “The MMDA was created to put some order in the metropolitan transportation system but unfortunately, the powers granted by its charter are limited,” read the CA decision.
    “The promotion of the general welfare is a bit antithetical to the preservation of the rule of law.”
    In implementing the single ticketing system, Fernando needs the approval of the Metro Manila Council as required by Republic Act 7294, the law creating the MMDA, the CA said.
    The decision was written by Associate Justice Marlene Gonzales-Sison. – Mike Frialde

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,872
    #2
    Sad but true, the MMDA's ability to enforce traffic laws is limited by the law which created it. While I cannot agree with a lot of BF's policies (i.e. elevated u-turns, EDSA loading bays, etc.), the no-contact apprehension scheme seemed to be a practical way of apprehending traffic law violators. The single ticket system, on the other hand, made it easier for the apprehended motorist to settle his fine or contest his violation.

  3. Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,455
    #3
    pera pera lang yan...


    haaaay paano tayo aasenso...

  4. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,757
    #4
    yung no contact policy medyo nagva-violate ng right for due process natin kaya i agree with the CA on this. lalo na kung still photo, it doesn't show the actual event that happened. andaling imanipulate.

    but the single ticketing system, and as the CA mentioned, is not a bad idea. it just didn't go throught proper channels. ito halatang away pera lang between the MMDA and mayors and it really doesn't make sense na pa iba iba ang ticket per city or municipality.

CA declares MMDA single-ticket scheme, no-contact policy void