Anthropogenic Climate Change: Skepticism and why science is never settled

[b_9904]

Seriously, those who still doubt that there is man-made climate change at this time (going into 2016) strike me as like those who doubted that the earth is round or that the sun is the center of the universe despite the scientific evidences.

Just saying.

Peace ✌

Short answer: The planet's climate HAS been changing on its own. If there is man made climate change then we should see a steady increase in certain areas in relation to what we are doing like temp vis-a-vis co2 levels, but that isn't happening. We see a different correlation. So, before saying there is man made climate change we must explain the disconnect.

I see alarmists as those who insist on Newton's theory of what space IS as the "truth"! (Just in case you do not know what it is: Space [as in "espasyo"] is EMPTY.)

[Vodka]

space isn't empty. it's filled w/ dark matter

[XploY]

can somebody explain it from the beginning? like from the big bang to evolution? without the empirical, theres no way we can understand the whole climate thing.

[Vodka]

can somebody explain it from the beginning? like from the big bang to evolution? without the empirical, theres no way we can understand the whole climate thing.

what are you smoking?

the bottom line is the world will be better if we didn't burn as much fossil fuels that are going to run out ANYWAY pollution sucks, really

the world should transition away from a model that requires massive population growth in order to have economic growth. overpopulaton sucks, really

[safeorigin]

space isn't empty. it's filled w/ dark matter

you say that but so far, nobody has definitively proven it exists... FUSION | The Growing Case Against the Big Bang

it strikes me that people haven't been paying attention to the historical charts posted including the irradiance profile of H2O compared to CO2.

if anything, we might be heading towards another ice age and fossil fuels are the last thing you want to rid of when it comes.

[XploY]

what are you smoking?

the bottom line is the world will be better if we didn't burn as much fossil fuels that are going to run out ANYWAY pollution sucks, really

the world should transition away from a model that requires massive population growth in order to have economic growth. overpopulaton sucks, really

lol. Please provide some data, we need proof. According to beh9904, mother earth changes itself with or without human intervention. And it's evident in the last ice age, theres no fossil fuel at that time, and oh how about the core? When the core shift from north to south? Whats going to happen? It's imperative that we should begin from big bang, the foundation of everything, so WE the Filipino people can understand.

[safeorigin]

what are you smoking?

the bottom line is the world will be better if we didn't burn as much fossil fuels that are going to run out ANYWAY pollution sucks, really

ironically, that pollution is making the planet greener

Global Garden Gets Greener : Feature Articles

in case you're not aware, CO2 has been 2000% higher long before humans existed than today and the world didn't turn into Venus.

[Vodka]

ironically, that pollution is making the planet greener

Global Garden Gets Greener : Feature Articles

last time i checked we're not plants

[safeorigin]

last time i checked we're not plants

yet we're integral to the carbon cycle - it's symbiotic relationship. last time I checked, the atmosphere is 21% oxygen and 0.04% carbon dioxide.

[anonemus]

The rest are here Arguments from Global Warming Skeptics and what the science really says

Naka ka tamad na to argue eh. Been doing this in my line of work for years and have personally talked with those in the IPCC.

Unfortunately, it's us in the Philippines who are at the most losing end in this biggest disaster in the history of mankind