2022 Presidential Elections

[Little Missy]

Calling them yellowtards and saying you are for unification is an oxymoron.

"healing" president pero naghahanap ng away

Sent from my LYA-L29 using Tapatalk

[Little Missy]

Links to the Office of the VP Annual reports from 2016-2020.

https://twitter.com/bernuaua/status/...909536771?s=19


Sent from my LYA-L29 using Tapatalk

[ChoyJo]

Guys Okay lang yang Banggahan ha.. May kanya-kanya namang opinyon pero see to it na huwag maRed Flag ng Mods natin.. I don’t usually post pero active ako magbasa ng mga posts.. Bawat Opinion ninyo mahalaga para naman mapili natin ng tama mga maiposisyon natin sa election next year.. Mas gusto ko namang malayo dito kesa sa Social Media.. Mas credible at may laman ang mga information dito at malayong may mas sense ang mga Tao/members dito.. 👍

[tsupermario]

Ano ba kayo tsikoteers masyado kayo fixated sa marcos aquino!!!!

Last Sept. 21, 2021, the nation marked the 49th anniversary of the declaration of martial law by then President Ferdinand Marcos who abolished Congress and made himself the dictator of the Philippines, ruling the country by decree. The martial law period also saw the plunder of the nation by President Marcos and his cronies. This plunder is established and recorded for posterity in several decisions of the Supreme Court, two of which involve the secret Marcos foreign bank accounts.

First is the landmark 2003 case of Republic v. Sandiganbayan, a unanimous en banc decision of the Supreme Court which forfeited in favor of the Philippine government $658 million in Swiss bank accounts of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos as ill-gotten wealth. The respondents in this case are the entire Marcos family, composed of Imelda Marcos, Bongbong Marcos, Imee Marcos, and Irene Marcos, who in their pleadings claimed ownership of the $658 million Swiss accounts. The Supreme Court found that “respondents judicially admitted that the money deposited with the Swiss banks belonged to them,” even as the Swiss accounts were in the names of five foreign foundations.

The Court used as legal basis for the forfeiture Section 2 of Republic Act No. 1379, a 1955 law which expressly states: “Whenever any public officer or employee has acquired during his incumbency an amount of property which is manifestly out of proportion to his salary as such public officer or employee and to his other lawful income and the income from legitimately acquired property, said property shall be presumed prima facie to have been unlawfully acquired.”

The Court found that the “spouses Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos were public officials during the time material to the instant case” and their only lawful source of income were their government salaries. The Court approved the computation by the Solicitor General of all the possible legal income of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos, and this amounted to only $304,372.43. The Court ruled: “The sum of $304,372.43 should be held as the only known lawful income of respondents since they did not file any Statement of Assets and Liabilities (SAL), as required by law, from which their net worth could be determined.”

The Court thus forfeited as unlawfully acquired wealth the Swiss accounts, disposing the case as follows: “The Swiss deposits which were transferred to and are now deposited in escrow at the Philippine National Bank in the estimated aggregate amount of US$658,175,373.60 as of January 31, 2002, plus interest, are hereby forfeited in favor of petitioner Republic of the Philippines.”

Second are the 2012 consolidated cases of Marcos Jr. v. Republic and Imelda Marcos v. Republic, which involved the $3,369,975 account of Arelma, Inc., with Merrill Lynch of New York, USA. The Court’s Second Division quoted with approval the Petition for Forfeiture which narrated: “When the Marcos family fled Manila in 1986, they left behind several documents that revealed the existence of secret bank deposits in Switzerland and other financial centers. These papers xxx detailed how ‘Arelma, Inc.’ was established. xxx The latter (Arelma) was to have the same set-up as Maler, one of the five Swiss foundations xxx.” In Marcos Jr. v. Republic, Bongbong Marcos claimed, as one of the heirs of Ferdinand Marcos, ownership of the Arelma deposit. The Court, however, citing the earlier 2003 case of Republic v. Sandiganbayan, ruled that the Arelma deposit was part of the unlawfully acquired wealth of Ferdinand Marcos.

There are other Supreme Court decisions establishing the ill-gotten wealth of Ferdinand Marcos. Those who seek to revise the historical narrative of the Marcos plunder during martial law will run against a formidable wall of authoritative decisions of the Supreme Court which were rendered after the Marcoses were duly heard.

The Supreme Court as historian | Inquirer Opinion

[QUEZ]

“I’m a Muslim,” said Misuari. “The fault of the father cannot be inherited by the son, Neither the father can be accused by of the wrongdoings of his son. I’m a Muslim.”

Nur Misuari


Sent from my SM-A315G using Tapatalk

[Little Missy]

[emoji848]

Sent from my LYA-L29 using Tapatalk

[shadow]

Maawa naman kayo kay bato. Wala bang mga die hard fans dito?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ratboy]

Pag nagsubstitute nga si sara kay bato edi magbabangaan na rin dds tsaka marcos apologists hahaha

[xwangbu]

si bato ang taga-pagligtas ng oposisyon, este "non-dds candidates".

[ratboy]

si bato ang taga-pagligtas ng oposisyon, este "non-dds candidates".

sana mag swap si sara kay bato. para magkasamaan ng loob mga macoy loyalist at dds hahaha 12 years ng walang ibang gagawin kundi magiiyak si macoy junior niyan simula 2016 buhay niyan umikot na lang sa sama ng loob dahil dinaya daw. tas another 6 years na hagulgol at disappointment nanaman pag kinalaban siya ni sara. buti nga sa kanya hahaha