Gas saving device

**ghosthunter** · October 7th, 2004 09:24 PM

Originally posted by niky
So I take it Mr. Rajuta's so-called testing results are likewise in question?

Good point...

So that means his so-called positive results have to be faked... which can be concluded that the product CANNOT hold up to its claims... otherwise, why produce FAKE people to say something positive about your device?

**GlennSter** · October 7th, 2004 09:32 PM

awwww....sayang ganda pa naman ng discussion.

some people talaga cannot help but resort to making fake people just to prove their losing points...

haaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

**ghosthunter** · October 7th, 2004 09:35 PM

well there is still the other thread... hehehe

http://tsikot.yehey.com/forums/showt...0&pagenumber=7

**blugsr98** · October 8th, 2004 09:03 AM

ghosthunter/glennster,
with regards to the claim that raijuta is a fake person with a fake results, im sorry that i have to say your wrong. beleive it or not, we both got our device and have it installed by a single distributor/dealer.

i see the same result as he claims though not that high gain due to variation on driving style. also he owns A/T while i have M/T both 1.6L engines.

btw, thank for the info you gave. quite happy that im getting info from third parties. this is really big help.

with the concern on the possible emmission of NOx, i guess the test results from Ford and DOE would be enough to say that this complies with Safety Measures.

**blugsr98** · October 8th, 2004 09:22 AM

for this statement:

"A vacuum meter is used to monitor the amount of negative pressure (suction) in the intake manifold. A vacuum meter reading is used to diagnose a variety of engine problems, from a blown head gasket to worn valve guides. It also can be used to monitor fuel economy, with high vacuum readings indicating good fuel economy and low vacuum readings indicating poor fuel economy."

now im quite confused, how come both of us (raijuta and myself) are getting good result in terms of fuel economy with the low vaccum reading as compared to high vaccum reading before installationor khaos? any idea?

**raijuta** · October 8th, 2004 09:33 AM

Hi everyone...what I did was really wrong and I apologize for this....Sir moderator sorry for doing this...

Well we are really just testing the device...and dont want to prove anything...if you want it..get it..it doesnt work for you...return..it...again..I apologize for the trouble this may have caused..

O continue na discussion......natin tungkol dito...sayang naman maganda ang topic...as blue gsr said..meron ba tayong pwedeng makapagtestingan ng A/F mixture...actually 2mm of HG ang minemaintain na pressure nung device...medyo mababa nga kng compared dun sa regular pressure ng engine..

**blugsr98** · October 8th, 2004 09:40 AM

actually i already raised this concern on the low vacuum reading from the distributor/dealer. they said that tey are confident enough to say that we are not running lean with the reading. they are open for test on the A/F ratio if you want. appreciate if you could suggest a shop that offers this testing. thanks!

**raijuta** · October 8th, 2004 10:22 AM

Mas maganda nga na matest na to...tama rin kc yung point nila na nakakasave nga tayo pero..baka may sinisira naman sa engine...

well, ang iniisip ko na lang is nakapasa sya sa testing ng DOE and Ford Philippines. kaso di mo pa din masabi..corrupt government ng philippines eh

**mazdamazda** · October 8th, 2004 11:08 AM

with the concern on the possible emmission of NOx, i guess the test results from Ford and DOE would be enough to say that this complies with Safety Measures.

well, ang iniisip ko na lang is nakapasa sya sa testing ng DOE and Ford Philippines

the problem with our emmission control testing is that they don't test for NOx. they only test for hydrocarbons & CO2 levels.

hope that we can enlighten our legislators & car manufacturers about the effects of NOx.