What can you say about Mitsubishi Galant 94-96 models?

[futbolero]

Bro, I need your inputs regarding Mitsubishi Galant 94-96 models! Thanks in Advance! :soccer:

[GlennSter]

what variant?

galant supersaloon has a 2.0L 4g63 4 cylinder engine 16 valves (great for daily driving, mejo malakas din sa gas but hey...it's a big car naman...)

galant vr v6 has a 2.0L 6a12 24 valves (f*ckin fast especially sa highway, malakas sa gas)

main problem that you may encounter is the weak front suspension and servo.

[niky]

Nice car... great engine... be careful of the front suspension nga... the ball joints are expensive to replace. But it's also a matter of luck, some people don't have the problem. And if the previous owner has replaced the ball joints already, good for you!

[theveed]

Avoid AT

[fakesaint]

Avoid AT

yep...I drove 1 once yung vr a/t, pag umabot ng 100 kph. ang speed biglang nagshishift to neutral, Labo.......

[BlueBimmer]

yep...I drove 1 once yung vr a/t, pag umabot ng 100 kph. ang speed biglang nagshishift to neutral, Labo.......

wow no wonder sirain..

[niky]

I'd say the same about the Accord LXi A/T, but having driven just one, I can't generalize... basically, avoid any old ATs... for good measure. Sayang lang din yung gas mo... :lol:

[popoyn]

i own one before .2.0 a/t. fast, good handling. expensive suspension, malakas sa gas, kasama ang model na yan sa narecall sa japan because of the defective a/t.rebuilding kit alone cost 75t before. mine was fixed by citimotors for only 10t because of a friend in pamcor.

[orly_andico]

that is so weird.. bakit lahat halos ng AT of those years, sirain? ganun din yung mazda 626 of those years.

as for the ball joints.. kaya siguro ni Zee yun

[theveed]

check mo sa reliability reports worldwide, 88-96 Galant ATs are unanimously junk. Pero I'd love to have a MT V6 though. Porma talaga eh.