Raffy Nieto
"Does the SUA group agree with the DTI report?"
To clarify, those active (like myself) in this SUA info site are not part of any organized group on this issue.
We all contribute individually to its content. So the opinions we post are our own, unless we are quoting an external group not related to those managing this site. So here, I will provide MY OWN OPINION on this DTI Decision…
I DO NOT AGREE with the Pedal Misapplication theory being stated by DTI. If you read the Horiba Mira report, it clearly states that its not yet understood why the Montero is susceptible to pedal Misapplication when other vehicles that have NO SUA reports also have similar pedal positions...
In fairness to the DTI Adjudication Team who are currently working on this, am aware that they were challenged to render a decision on the matter as it was difficult to find a specific cause for what causes SUA. The SUPER HIGH SUA RATE on the Montero Gen 2 (2010-2015) is too high to ignore. It’s statistically impossible to render all these SUA reports on the Montero as PURELY COINCIDENTAL…
When Mitsubishi published the Horiba Mira report, there was an obvious clear assessment that since pedal misapplication is seen as the likely cause and that SUA is only reported on the Montero Gen2, then there must be a problem with the pedal orientation that results in SUA…
DTI therefore opted to use Mitsubishi’s own self-initiated study, which resulted in Mitsubishi shooting themselves in the foot by formally submitting the Horiba Mira report as a point of defense…
While I don’t agree with the DTI report, the fact that they rendered the Montero to have a defect that warrants a recall is good enough for now. The SUA reports still continue. It’s no longer being propagated by corporate media (i.e. TV, newspapers, etc.), the we still continue to get reports through social media channels…
Many of us (including myself) who have already had settlements with Mitsubishi don’t want to see others continue to experience SUA. So we work on keeping info on this to be readily available to those who want to learn more. This awareness on SUA would help advocate much needed safety to avoid further accidents from happening…
So in summary, I see this DTI report as a START to initiate further investigations on the matter. In that regard, it does contain some value on this issue.
This is what the Horiba Mira report states:
It's very clear here, "RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER WORK". The investigation must continue. But Mitsubishi just decided to use this report to prematurely claim that there is nothing wrong with their product.