Lots of Mitsubishi asx selling at low milage

[coolphilboy]

Hehe baka motor yan.

Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

[coolphilboy]

But honestly mas matipid ang Montero ko 9-10km/l ako on city drive. Kainis nga eh di ko maubos monthly gas allocation ko. Kaya sa ASX ko sulit ang fc ko asiong aksaya eh 😃

Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

[homhomnova]

baka binebenta asx nila kasi papalitan ng cx5???😎😜. 12 to 14 km/L citydriving ng cx5

Patawa naman to.. baka pag highway 20-22 km/l na yan.. talo pa wigo at mirage.. hehehe..

o baka naman yung city driving ay mula batangas city papuntang lipa city.. hehe..

[Noel Salisipan]

Patawa naman to.. baka pag highway 20-22 km/l na yan.. talo pa wigo at mirage.. hehehe..

o baka naman yung city driving ay mula batangas city papuntang lipa city.. hehe..

(duplicate copy, sorry!)

[Noel Salisipan]

Patawa naman to.. baka pag highway 20-22 km/l na yan.. talo pa wigo at mirage.. hehehe..

o baka naman yung city driving ay mula batangas city papuntang lipa city.. hehe..

ok naman yung 12-14kpl sa CX5, ang tanong saan bang city yan at anong oras, anong method ang ginamit at gaano kahaba ng takbo?

[leodawesome]

^ Yup, possible na euro time ang pasok nya. Yung tipong 12AM ang uwi.

[Albastru]

ok naman yung 12-14kpl sa CX5, ang tanong saan bang city yan at anong oras, anong method ang ginamit at gaano kahaba ng takbo?

Sa city cguro pero gabi. Hehehe... 12-14km/L is normal kung mixed driving with at least 50% highway pero purely city drive * 20-30 kph na takbo I think nasa 9-10km/L depende sa paa. Masmatipid ang CX-5 compared to most 2.0L CUV and would be comparable to most 2.0 sedans.

[jut703]

Kaya nga dapat ginagamit yung average speed function nung trip computer.

Dami kasing tatanga tanga yung FC lang tinitingnan, eh importante din yung average speed para magauge kung gaano ba talaga kaluwag or kalala yung traffic at that time.


Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

[Noel Salisipan]

BTT, my asx still good for me lalo na pag luwas sa Manila at wala naman gaanong karga.
My odo clocks at 48k, all in all ang average FC ko is 10.13kpl. (FC is "total kilometer" run over "all fuel" consumed).

[Manilablock]

Misleading ang trip computer unless it's over a considerable distance.

Pataasan ba ng ihi sa "city" driving FC basing only on trip computer?

O eto, 13 km/L city driving with my Ranger. Taken in the middle of EDSA traffic (see the buses).




Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

dapat magkaroon dito sa tsikot ng FC posting rules, full tank to full tank lan ang basehan para mixed city & Hway driving talaga ang magagamit.

[yebo]

Bakit pag mataas ang fuel mileage ang iniisip agad e mali o exagerated na? E hindi naman pareho mga paa natin. Totoo pag hataw mode ako wala pa 6km/l tinatakbo ng kahit anong sasakyan na hawak ko. Kaya ko nga mag-5km/l HIWAY e, hataw natin ng 200kph e sisiw lang makuha yan (on a sorento yan ha. alam ko po na hindi kaya ng bt50 ang 200kph, top speed of my 3.2 bt50 ay 172kph based on gps, tried na sa tplex). Pero pag tipid mode naman e kaya din yung inverse, 8.5km/l city driving e madali lang ma-achieve. Kaya pa nga ng 13.5 km/l hiway pag 90 kph lang takbo ng bt50. Depende yan sa apak mo sa silinyador. At opo, average yan hindi instantaneous, verified with full tank/km run method. Di naman ako mangmang e.

Maliit kasi makina ng ranger nyo, 2.2, kaya hirap. Same weight being pulled by a less efficient engine = lower gas mileage. Parehas lang yan ng vios 1.3 and vios 1.5, mas matipid sa gas yung 1.5. Newtonian physics lang yan.

[yebo]

Average edsa, quezon avenue and espana traffic po yung nabanggit na city driving, NOT bumper to bumper.Siguro average speed nasa 50-60kph on stretches and gapang on bottlenecks (i.e., cubao, shaw, morayta, quiapo). At syempre malamig ang ulo at magaang ang paa.

[Syuryuken]

dagdag stress lang yang pag-iisip sa FC gamitin lang ng gamitin ang sasakyan mas sayang kung nakakulambo lang sa garahe dahil sa pag-iisip sa kunsumo.

[jut703]

Bakit pag mataas ang fuel mileage ang iniisip agad e mali o exagerated na? E hindi naman pareho mga paa natin. Totoo pag hataw mode ako wala pa 6km/l tinatakbo ng kahit anong sasakyan na hawak ko. Kaya ko nga mag-5km/l HIWAY e, hataw natin ng 200kph e sisiw lang makuha yan (on a sorento yan ha. alam ko po na hindi kaya ng bt50 ang 200kph, top speed of my 3.2 bt50 ay 172kph based on gps, tried na sa tplex). Pero pag tipid mode naman e kaya din yung inverse, 8.5km/l city driving e madali lang ma-achieve. Kaya pa nga ng 13.5 km/l hiway pag 90 kph lang takbo ng bt50. Depende yan sa apak mo sa silinyador. At opo, average yan hindi instantaneous, verified with full tank/km run method. Di naman ako mangmang e.

Maliit kasi makina ng ranger nyo, 2.2, kaya hirap. Same weight being pulled by a less efficient engine = lower gas mileage. Parehas lang yan ng vios 1.3 and vios 1.5, mas matipid sa gas yung 1.5. Newtonian physics lang yan.

I would assume papi na ako yung pinatatamaan mo dito dahil ako lang naman yung nagpost na naka-2.2 Ranger (despite you using "niyo" instead of "mo").

First, I never found your 8.5 km/L city driving FC to be erroneous or exaggerated. It's perfectly normal to get 8.5 km/L city driving if the traffic isn't so bad - in the same conditions you described in another post, I would get 9-10 km/L if I pay attention to my driving.

We do, however, have different experiences of our worst city FC. You described 8.5 km/L as your "worst" city FC, while I have gone lower because I frequently find myself in worse traffic (Makati-Pasig via EDSA rush hour is common for me). My average speed is 15 kph according to a trip computer - AutoIndustriya already considers 20 kph average as moderate to heavy, so 15 kph is actually on the low end of the spectrum.

What I find ludicrous is claiming double-digit city FC figures for 2-liter cars (i.e. CX-5 doing 12-14 km/L city driving). It's possible, yes, but it's not really indicative of typical "city traffic".

Second, I never said that you were "mangmang" and only used instantaneous readings without verifying through full tank method. Again, I am referring to the ludicrous CX-5 post that was actually secondhand info that was based on trip computer readings alone.

Third, I disagree that the 2.2 MT engine (you said Ranger "niyo", and this is what I have in my Ranger) is inherently less fuel efficient in city driving than the 3.2 5-cylinder engine paired with a 6AT, ceteris paribus.

It's true that a bigger engine will require less effort to sustain speed, but this should be more apparent in light traffic and highway driving. When you're in the city and stuck in a traffic jam for 2 hours, the 3.2 is thirstier because a 3.2 consumes more at idle than a 2.2. At low speeds (20-50 kph, usual speed in the city), I wouldn't say that the 2.2 is stressed all that much, so it isn't at a disadvantage versus the 3.2.

************'s Uly Ang got 8.19 km/L with the 2.2 AT, while he got 7.57 km/L with the 3.2 AT.

AI's Vince ****elos got 8.9 km/L with the 2.2 AT, while he got 9.1 km/L with the 3.2 AT. Note that the figures are higher than Uly's test, which could mean that Vince is that much more efficient of a driver than Uly, or Vince's city test route was less clogged than Uly's, which as I said above is more advantageous for the 3.2.

Lastly, resident poster Niky Tamayo got 8-10 km/L in the city with the 2.2 MT, compared to 6-8 km/L with the 3.2 AT. On the highway, he claims both will get 14-16 km/L when driven nicely. This again supports my hypothesis that the 3.2 closes in on the 2.2's FC at higher speeds rather than in city driving.

[Walter]

You won't get much fuel efficiency these days in Davao where the city speed limit is 30 kph.

[fitdrive]

Ang panalo ngaun liit kotse mo, tpos body frame mo tipong pang Korean Novela, kaya magsuot ng fitting suit

Gone are the days of big SUV men with big tummys and average 220lbs

Yun ang mga magastos sa tingin ko, imagine going to and fro sa work with their fortuners / pajeros, consuming too much road space and fuel everyday, tapos bababa, kala mo Kung sinong maskulado yun pala 3 gatang ng Kanin tapos adobo tinitita kada dinner, yun sa tingin ko parasite of nature. Consumes way too much of resources, add to that their big wives and on the way oversized children who hang out in Starbucks/CBtl daily. Imagine kid slurping all that calories without even working, lakas consumo buong pamilya




Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

[tidus1203]

Ang panalo ngaun liit kotse mo, tpos body frame mo tipong pang Korean Novela, kaya magsuot ng fitting suit

Gone are the days of big SUV men with big tummys and average 220lbs

Yun ang mga magastos sa tingin ko, imagine going to and fro sa work with their fortuners / pajeros, consuming too much road space and fuel everyday, tapos bababa, kala mo Kung sinong maskulado yun pala 3 gatang ng Kanin tapos adobo tinitita kada dinner, yun sa tingin ko parasite of nature. Consumes way too much of resources, add to that their big wives and on the way oversized children who hang out in Starbucks/CBtl daily. Imagine kid slurping all that calories without even working, lakas consumo buong pamilya




Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

OB is that you?

[carofsteel]

Ang panalo ngaun liit kotse mo, tpos body frame mo tipong pang Korean Novela, kaya magsuot ng fitting suit

Gone are the days of big SUV men with big tummys and average 220lbs

Yun ang mga magastos sa tingin ko, imagine going to and fro sa work with their fortuners / pajeros, consuming too much road space and fuel everyday, tapos bababa, kala mo Kung sinong maskulado yun pala 3 gatang ng Kanin tapos adobo tinitita kada dinner, yun sa tingin ko parasite of nature. Consumes way too much of resources, add to that their big wives and on the way oversized children who hang out in Starbucks/CBtl daily. Imagine kid slurping all that calories without even working, lakas consumo buong pamilya




Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

Selling at Low mileage naging fuel consumption, ngayon naman naging food consumption. Lol


Posted via Air Mail

[falken]

Ang panalo ngaun liit kotse mo, tpos body frame mo tipong pang Korean Novela, kaya magsuot ng fitting suit

Gone are the days of big SUV men with big tummys and average 220lbs

Yun ang mga magastos sa tingin ko, imagine going to and fro sa work with their fortuners / pajeros, consuming too much road space and fuel everyday, tapos bababa, kala mo Kung sinong maskulado yun pala 3 gatang ng Kanin tapos adobo tinitita kada dinner, yun sa tingin ko parasite of nature. Consumes way too much of resources, add to that their big wives and on the way oversized children who hang out in Starbucks/CBtl daily. Imagine kid slurping all that calories without even working, lakas consumo buong pamilya




Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

OB in the house!

Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

[Walter]

Ang panalo ngaun liit kotse mo, tpos body frame mo tipong pang Korean Novela, kaya magsuot ng fitting suit

Gone are the days of big SUV men with big tummys and average 220lbs

Yun ang mga magastos sa tingin ko, imagine going to and fro sa work with their fortuners / pajeros, consuming too much road space and fuel everyday, tapos bababa, kala mo Kung sinong maskulado yun pala 3 gatang ng Kanin tapos adobo tinitita kada dinner, yun sa tingin ko parasite of nature. Consumes way too much of resources, add to that their big wives and on the way oversized children who hang out in Starbucks/CBtl daily. Imagine kid slurping all that calories without even working, lakas consumo buong pamilya




Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

In another thread, you bragged you weren't flagged down by a traffic enforcer because you were driving a big American SUV.