04 Lancer GLX A/T and M/T???

**crisgen** · April 1st, 2008 02:02 AM

tanong ko lang po, A/T or M/T po ba ang 04 lancer GLX?

**1D4LV** · April 1st, 2008 11:23 AM

Originally Posted by crisgen

tanong ko lang po, A/T or M/T po ba ang 04 lancer GLX?

GLX - MT
GLS - AT
MX - CVT

**AG4** · April 16th, 2008 12:50 AM

Originally Posted by 1D4LV

GLX - MT
GLS - AT
MX - CVT

The Lancer GLS also uses a 6-speed INVECS-III CVT.

Its the 2006-2007 Lancer 2.0 GT that had a 4-speed A/T(INVECS-II), looks like the old CVT and the more powerful 4G63 2.0 liter engine wasn't a perfect match.

**niky** · April 16th, 2008 12:07 PM

The old CVT, AFAIK, wasn't built to handle the torque loads generated by 2 liter engines. Just as with the Jazz/City CVT (which is why there are no CVT Civics here...)

**Darth_Banger** · April 27th, 2008 02:52 AM

Sir what is the average fuel consumption of this 2004 Lancer GLX 9M/T)?...Tnx!!!!

**aizen** · May 2nd, 2008 03:09 PM

Originally Posted by Darth_Banger

Sir what is the average fuel consumption of this 2004 Lancer GLX 9M/T)?...Tnx!!!!

10 to 11 km / liter city driving
13 to 14 km / liter no traffic

**istan** · May 2nd, 2008 04:24 PM

Its the 2006-2007 Lancer 2.0 GT that had a 4-speed A/T(INVECS-II), looks like the old CVT and the more powerful 4G63 2.0 liter engine wasn't a perfect match. <- by AG4

I think the 4 speed A/T (INVECS-II) is not CVT. Rather, its the normal run of the mill automatic.

**niky** · May 4th, 2008 12:27 AM

Originally Posted by istan

Its the 2006-2007 Lancer 2.0 GT that had a 4-speed A/T(INVECS-II), looks like the old CVT and the more powerful 4G63 2.0 liter engine wasn't a perfect match. <- by AG4

I think the 4 speed A/T (INVECS-II) is not CVT. Rather, its the normal run of the mill automatic.

And that's what AG4 is saying. He's saying that the 2.0 GT did not have CVT. But the 1.8 MX did.

Note, sabi niya "wasn't". Meaning it isn't there.