What is your camera?

[testament11]

I have the biggest crush on Paco Guerrero He is so talented.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4

Ang gwapo pa ano :gayfight:

[_Cathy_]

Ang gwapo pa ano :gayfight:

Yeah sobrang guapo and huggable

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 4

[ZENMasterTYL]

Meron ah. Underrated lang kasi photography dito sa atin. Akala kasi ng mga tao, ganun ganun lang kadali magkuha ng picture at ganun lang kamura ang gamit. Di nila naisip na may art ang pagkuha ng picture at pinag-aaralan yun

+100. yung iba kasi para maging in lang (SC mode), bibili ng dslr tapos pag ginamit, parang point and shoot lang

marami ako ka batch, nag crossover sila from being enthusiasts to pro, and they are doing pretty good sa business nila

[brainmafia_310]

Sony cybershot lang po at s3 & s4.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4

[imperialv]

My camera nikon d600, canon s100, sony nex 5n

[testament11]

+100. yung iba kasi para maging in lang (SC mode), bibili ng dslr tapos pag ginamit, parang point and shoot lang

At yan tuloy nagiging mindset ng madaming tao. Basta may DSLR ka, magaling ka. Pwe!

Di kasi alam ng mga tao na ang photography ay pinag-aaralan at hindi biro ang ginagastos. Siguro tingin ng mga tao sa isang 70-200 na lente eh 2k o 3k lang :hammer:

Worst, tingin ng marami ay hobby ng mayayaman ang photography. Hobby for others pero trabaho ito para sa iba.

Ang pakiusap ko rin lang sana sa mga tao, na baguhin nila ang mindset sa mga photographer. Nakakainis kaya yun binabarat ka na kulang nalang ibigay ng libre. Eh ang laki laki ng nagagastos sa mga gamit palang.

[jansky]

^^ di lang ganyan, may mga photographer din na binabagsak ang presyo para makuha nil Klyente, meron naman ung iba may grupo pero halos ala rin kitain kasi pinaghahatain din nila ung kita, nag invest ka sa gamit at sa skills pero sa ganyang klaseng kalakaran hindi mo mababwi ung ininvest mo,

Its true some build up their name, but ilang percentge lang yan , lucky you pag ung isang kuha mo nagustuhan ng isang bigating tao or big company this will put you up in different level and change your destiny

[Monseratto]

[Retz]

could you recommend a good mirrorless camera?

[x_outpost]

could you recommend a good mirrorless camera?

Do you currently own a dSLR system?

[Retz]

^

No, sir. Too bulky. kaya i prefer the mirrorless intead. ung pang beginner lang.

[x_outpost]

^

No, sir. Too bulky. kaya i prefer the mirrorless intead. ung pang beginner lang.

Sony NEX is one of the best out there IMO. They have matured and have nice features not found in other mirrorless.
I used to have one but I sold it as I didn't want to keep to systems (Canon and Sony lenses). So I bought a EOS M.

[donbuggy]

Olympus E-P3
Olympus TG-1
Sony SLT A33

[donbuggy]

could you recommend a good mirrorless camera?

If you like to adjust your camera settings, buy a better lens (i.e. prime lenses) and change lenses, then go with micro four thirds (Panasonic or Olympus).

If you like to point and shoot and use only the kit lens, then get a Sony NEX.

[dr. d]

i used to be the all-manual fanatic. had the metal dinosaur nikon F2AS, with heavy 50mm 1.4 lens and bazooka 80-200 zoom, and the huge 285 flash. very heavy. very professional. and when the shooting starts, i could hide behind them.
then i graduated to the F3HP. still big, but AE already.
then the AFs: 301, 801, 2000, with matching AF zooms. good for slower reflexes.
now, with failing eyesight, slower reflexes and bad back, i just put the paperclip box-sized lumix zoom point n shoot in my pocket... if i'm not going to enlarge the pictures to life-size, it won't matter.

[Flip]

Lumix zs7. I like: the gps kahit slow at minsan inaccurate location, custom settings, compact, lightweight, cheap? around 13k iirc in 2010, and 12x zoom for the paparazzi shots. Mag upgrade ako pag may compact na 30x zoom na. Cons are: weak flash and not so intelligent auto mode.

[castortroy]

Fuji X-E1 with 35mm 1.4 and 18-55mm
D700 50mm 1.8G 24-70mm 2.8