What Are You Thinking About?

[macsd]

ang mahihirap kasi madali utuin/suhulan para iboto sila...

Precisely the reason. Hindi lang sa boto gamit ng mga yan, if the mayor need warm bodies for protest, barricades etc... always available mga yan.

[dr. d]

Precisely the reason. Hindi lang sa boto gamit ng mga yan, if the mayor need warm bodies for protest, barricades etc... always available mga yan.

many years ago, someone said that there was an ancient law that said, that only those with a legitimate home address, may vote. squatters did not fit into "legitimate home address". i wonder what happened...

[MR_BIG18]

logic is incorrect, then lets all steal nalang pala kung ganun din... baket hindi nalang eliminate ang squatters? yong housing project sa coastal road nabubulok lang... should legal people give in to the needs of the illegal ones?

Logic is incorrect but in reality they are voters protected by our public servants.

[MR_BIG18]

Where? Please share. I can use the extra for corn.

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

Olx sir, saw one before with big tires and a snorkel already.

[lowslowbenz]

What's with this LTO memo on vintage cars?

Useless bunch of hijo de potas!

[dr. d]

What's with this LTO memo on vintage cars?

Useless bunch of hijo de potas!

and yess.. the guy tried to explain the logic behind it.. but in truth, i got lost along the way.
seems to me, it was ill-conceived, had no definite use or advantage, and served only to make life more difficult to the owner AND to the lto.
i mean, the second statement appeared to belay the first statement... most cross-eyed example of gobbledygook i ever heard.
if you ask me... 'twould be better if they simply treat the vintage as any other car.. subject to current rules and specifications. but no retroactives, please.

[MR_BIG18]

and yess.. the guy tried to explain the logic behind it.. but in truth, i got lost along the way.
seems to me, it was ill-conceived, had no definite use or advantage, and served only to make life more difficult to the owner AND to the lto.
i mean, the second statement appeared to belay the first statement... most cross-eyed example of gobbledygook i ever heard.
if you ask me... 'twould be better if they simply treat the vintage as any other car.. subject to current rules and specifications. but no retroactives, please.

I think its a precursor to a new bill, like in singapore's COE.

[greenlyt]

sa Saturday (Sunday Manila time) na pala laban ni Packy

[Stigg ma]

Logic is incorrect but in reality they are voters protected by our public servants.

i lost hope in the Philippines already with this... the middle class are the true victims... middle class forced to pay tax to operate the government, the government supports poor people who they can easily buy to vote them and in return the govt lives a good luxurious life, the poor people lives also a good but not luxurious one (tambay), but with no employment they cant continue their good life, so they sometimes have nothing to do but to throw rocks at our windshields or steal or side mirrors to receive a commission for them to continue their good life... (worse case smash our windows to steal our belongings inside the vehicle)

[dr. d]

and yess.. the guy tried to explain the logic behind it.. but in truth, i got lost along the way.
seems to me, it was ill-conceived, had no definite use or advantage, and served only to make life more difficult to the owner AND to the lto.
i mean, the second statement appeared to belay the first statement... most cross-eyed example of gobbledygook i ever heard.
if you ask me... 'twould be better if they simply treat the vintage as any other car.. subject to current rules and specifications. but no retroactives, please.

i just heard that they retracted the vintage order.