New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    280
    #1
    Quote Originally Posted by 111prez
    all supreme court decisions have to be read and understood in its entirety. you cannot just isolate the dispositive portion (the part that gives the ruling on the case) and then take this as the general rule

    as always, all supreme court decisions are made with the particular facts of the case on hand.

    in this case, the supreme court, rightly or wrongly, made a judgement as to the lack of the need of a warning shot.

    i would be interested in reading the full text of this decision and find out more. paki post naman ang title ng case and date of the decision
    second the motion. kahit month of the decision ok na para mahanap sa website ng supreme court (assuming it's a 2005 case). very interested rin kasi ako dun sa particular circumstances surrounding the case.

    guys, sana wag naman tayo mabilis mag condemn ng human rights and human rights advocates, many of whom are victims themselves or families of victims of human rights violations. kahit naman sila would agree that shooting in self defense or out of necessity is a justifying circumstance.

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,819
    #2
    i think the key words in nugundam93's post "headingfor you" and "attacker". i think there is already a definite immediate threat here. while you can't shoot a robber running away, you definitely can shoot one that is going after you, irregardless of whether that attacker is armed or unarmed. why pwede kahit unarmed? because you will not stop to ask him first if he has a black belt in karatedo that's why.

  3. Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    405
    #3
    Shooting a warning shot is never an option, and is against the law in most if not all in the States.

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,865
    #4
    i don't see the point kasi minsan with "human rights" advocates.

    they take pity on the suspect but what about the victim and the family of the victim?

  5. Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    8,077
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by nugundam93
    i don't see the point kasi minsan with "human rights" advocates.

    they take pity on the suspect but what about the victim and the family of the victim?
    korek ka jan sir nugundam ...pag ginawa n mga pulis trabaho nila ...na paningin ng taga human rights may nilabag sila ...pag minalas sila pa nakasuhan ...pero kung sila naman naagrabyado...

    basta para sa ako iputok ko na lang talaga agad..wala na arning warning pa...
    makaka ilag pa at baka makatakbo pa lalo

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,388
    #6
    kalokohan yang mga human rights na yan. minsan sobra na silang OA!

  7. Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    49
    #7
    i agree with fLaKeZ..

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Pulis 'di kailangang mag-warning shot --Supreme Court