
Illustration by Paulo Alcazaren
'What's the Big Picture?' and Other questions we should ask before building another road
Two agencies have announced road projects that aim to ease traffic congestion on EDSA:
The MMDA unveiled a plan for a "Skybridge" that will stretch for 8.3 kilometers over a network of esteros. It will cost P10 billion.
The DPWH proposed building an "elevated EDSA" that will be 22 kilometers long. It will be built on top of the existing EDSA (above the MRT). Elevated EDSA will cost P50 billion.
But traffic congestion is just a symptom. The real problem we need to solve is "How do we make it easier to get around Metro Manila?"
Here are a few more important questions we should all ask about these proposed roads.
1. Who will benefit the most from using the proposed road?
Eight out of 10 people who live in Metro Manila take public transportation. Will the new road benefit them? Or will it serve the needs of the few people who own and drive cars?
2. Will it connect people to where they need to go?
Makati is still the largest center of employment in Metro Manila. Yet newer hubs of employment—such as Bonifacio Global City, Eastwood, and the Mall of Asia—are also growing fast. Will the proposed road also serve the people going to these hubs?
On the other hand, three out of every four people on the road are not on their way to work. They are going to schools, shops, hospitals, and other places. Will the new road serve their needs, too?
3. How will the route of the proposed road affect the existing road network?
Elevated highways will need off ramps and on ramps. If the connections of the new road to the existing network are not planned well, the ramps will generate traffic jams of their own. They may clog roads that work well now but will be flooded by new traffic trying to get to the ramps.
4. What are we gaining and losing from the proposed road?
The MMDA proposes building the Skybridge over esteros or creeks. Dredging the esteros is part of the project; this could be beneficial to the city drainage. But if dredging is not done well, it could block the flow of water and lead to flooding.
Our esteros may not seem like much now. But they were once part of a vibrant river network. Reviving them could ease flooding and improve the ecology of the Pasig River, the Laguna Lake, and the Manila Bay. Will the Skybridge limit our future options for reviving the esteros?
5. What's the big picture?
We should ask, “How will the new road fit into a long-term vision for Metro Manila?” Will it put our megacity on the path to a more sustainable future? Will it encourage more dependence on fossil fuels? Or will it encourage more sustainable forms of transportation like walking and biking?
It is easy to look for silver bullets for the problem of traffic congestion. But we can’t afford to sacrifice the future for short-term gains.
We need to ask tough questions now before building another road. And we need to make sure we are guided by a long-term vision for our megacity.
One more question:
Whose job is it to set the vision for Metro Manila? Take the poll below and share your thoughts with us.
"If you don’t know where you are going, any road will get you there." Lewis Carroll, English author and mathematician, could have been writing about Metropolitan Manila. Our megacity is a hodgepodge of 17 cities and municipalities, each with its own set of laws.
But someone has to take the lead for setting the vision for Metro Manila. Simply put, such a vision statement will answer the questions, Where is Metro Manila going? What will our megacity be like in the future?
*******
Benjamin de la Peņa is the Associate Director for Urban Development at the Rockefeller Foundation. He may be contacted at bdelapena.online*gmail.com. The views and opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the foundation.
Dinna Louise C. Dayao is a freelance writer and editor. She may be reached at dinnadayao*gmail.com.