Who were accountable for the Manila hostage crisis?
SOPHIA M. DEDACE, GMA News
08/22/2011 | 03:31 PM
The August 23, 2010 hostage tragedy in Manila claimed nine lives and put the then two-month-old Aquino administration in the spotlight of international ridicule.
GMA News Online looks back at the personalities held liable for the tragedy. Where are they now?
The crisis committee head: Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim
As de facto head of the local crisis management committee (CMC) because of his position as the city's chief executive, Lim's efforts were found inadequate.
The IIRC said Lim did not formally activate the local CMC according to the manual in handling hostage crises. Lim did not also activate the sub-groups of the CMC that were supposed to conduct the intelligence-gathering, brief the released hostages, evaluate Mendoza’s behavior, and handle the media covering the incident.
In the final hours of the hostage crisis, Lim, a former police general, adopted a strategy to wear out Mendoza and wait until he gives up. After ordering the MPD to "handcuff" Mendoza’s brother Gregorio, Lim then invited the ground commander, Magtibay, to the nearby Emerald Restaurant because he was "hungry."
The IIRC castigated Lim for this decision, saying his absence from the scene "created a vacuum in command or decision-makers" resulting "in the inability of those present to handle crises events as they unfolded."
The IIRC also criticized the mayor for focusing on Gregorio Mendoza, whom Lim ordered to be handcuffed. The IIRC said Lim should have trained his attention on the infuriated hostage-taker. "By attending to the peripheral matter, precious time to salvage the negotiations, already critical at this late hour of the crisis situation, was lost. The windows of opportunity were closing," said the IIRC.
The brother’s arrest was aired live and was seen by Mendoza on the television set inside the bus, a sight that allegedly drove the hostage-taker into a shooting frenzy that killed eight of his hostages.
The IIRC recommended criminal and administrative sanctions against Lim, but the Palace legal team only adopted the latter. The Palace ordered the initiation of administrative proceedings against Lim for misconduct in office and simple neglect (under Sec. 60 of the Local Government Code). His case was referred to the DILG.
One year later: Robredo said the DILG will soon issue a resolution on Lim’s fate. "The hearings on the case of Mayor Lim have already been terminated and he has submitted his memorandum last August 5. So the case is already submitted for resolution," the Interior secretary told GMA News Online.
The Palace legal team may have opted to adopt the IIRC’s findings against policemen and other government officials, but it chose not to follow the recommendation to sanction DILG Undersecretary Rico Puno, then PNP chief Director General Jesus Verzosa, and Manila City Vice-Mayor Francisco Domagoso a.k.a. Isko Moreno.
In particular, President Aquino was criticized for clearing Puno, his long-time friend and shooting buddy.
As undersecretary for peace and order, Puno was in charge of the PNP and was reporting directly to the President during the hostage crisis. On the first day of the IIRC hearings, Puno confessed that he is not trained to handle hostage crises.
The Palace review, however, said "there is no basis to file any administrative or criminal complaints" against Puno because, among other reasons, he was not part of the eight critical incidents listed by the IIRC that affected the outcome of the hostage crisis.
"He had no authority to directly interfere in the conduct of the PNP operations during the incident as he was not a member of the local crisis management committee," added the Palace review.
Aquino also defended his longtime friend, saying Puno did his job during the crisis.
"Almost all the things I tasked him to do, amongst them 'ano bang nangyayari diyan, hanap mo ko ng liaison that can brief me, talagang constantly as to what is developing,' that was done," said the President.
Aquino insisted that Puno's exclusion from the list of those who would be charged had nothing to do with their friendship.