Results 41 to 50 of 93
-
November 19th, 2004 12:25 AM #41Originally posted by wowiesy
may cut ang labor union dyan.. 20% ata... tapos dun sa 200 daily wage increase.. may cut din ang labor union dyan... hindi buo yan mapupunta sa employees covered by the CBA...
imbes na magtrabaho sila nang maayos eh nansusulsol lang sila? saan na punta yung 20% para maghakot ng mga pupunta sa picket line?
==========
ang hirap kasi sa ibang "labor groups" puro dada lang, eh hindi naman alam kung paano gumagana ang business.
katulad sa company namin ngayon - alam naman naming hindi pa halos kumikita. yung mga ibang empleyado, nagtsatsaga pa rin, kahit wala pang P500 ang increase nila. alam kasi nila ang sitwasyon ng kumpanya.
pati ang mga may-ari ng mga kompanya ay kayang mabuhay kapag isinara nila yun. e kapag nawala ang hacienda luisita, saan sila ngayon magtratrabaho? naisip ba nila yun? naisip rin ba nila na ang mga ibang tao ay apektado ng ginawa nila? yung mga nasa plantation workers? yung mga driver ng delivery trucks? edi pati ang ibang tao apektado.
-
November 19th, 2004 12:28 AM #42
I feel sorry for those people who died..
ang tanong may sss, philhealth ba sila or anything na kelangan ng mga manggagawa.
hmm cge let say, 180 nga ang minimum wage nila, eh pano pa yung 5% na deduction para sa mga yun (sss, philhealth etc.). so i guess tama lang n Php 200.00 ang hingin nila. may mga family din sila na umaasa.
sa 30k,hmm conjuangcos are rich, they are everywhere, andami nilang business, kaya nila yun. kung hindi uubra, why dont they face the people and negotiate. empathize with the people who are also a big help to them.
...parang hindi ko ata naririnig or nababasa ang DOLE na nakikialam dyan... may comment na ba sila?
-
November 19th, 2004 12:37 AM #43
vixen,
dineclare ng DOLE na illegal yung ginawa nilang strike and nag issue na ng return to work order.
kasi nag lay-off ang Hacienda Luisita ng ilang workers (may separation pay naman). yung ilan ayaw, kaya dun nag simula.
from a business POV, tingnan mo lang ang operation ng Hacienda Luisita, kahit mayaman si Cojuanco - galing yun sa ibang business nya - ba't niya i subsidize sa agricultural industry? alam mo naman hindi ganun ka lakas ang sugar industry and we are in some financial difficulty. halos lahat ng companies may belt-tightening.
-
November 19th, 2004 12:38 AM #44
ms. vixen pakitingnan po ang long term effect pag binigyan nila ng ganyang halaga ang mga tao...
and ms. vixen.. lets say 180 ang wage nila ngayon.. gusto nilang gawing 380 po.. kasi po +200 dba sobra naman ata??
and by the way, kung may ibang business man ang mga cojuangco, then dapat ba nilang icompensate ang losses ng hacienda luisita? eh kung nag bebleed lang din pala ng resources nila ito eh isara nalang..
in the first place, hacienda luisita has been losing money for ilang years na..kaya lang daw yan buhay up until now dahil part ng lupa eh binebenta ng mga cojuangcos para macompensate ang loss. malamang this loss is due to the smuggled sugar.
hayy hindi maganda ang maraming empleyado dito sa pinas hehe too powerful ang unions and employees... kaya napipilitan magcontractual ang mga companies. masmabuti nga for the company yun nga lang d ka nakakasiguro sa performance ng mga tao lagi
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Posts
- 1,326
November 19th, 2004 12:45 AM #45Originally posted by vixen
I feel sorry for those people who died..
ang tanong may sss, philhealth ba sila or anything na kelangan ng mga manggagawa.
hmm cge let say, 180 nga ang minimum wage nila, eh pano pa yung 5% na deduction para sa mga yun (sss, philhealth etc.). so i guess tama lang n Php 200.00 ang hingin nila. may mga family din sila na umaasa.
sa 30k,hmm conjuangcos are rich, they are everywhere, andami nilang business, kaya nila yun. kung hindi uubra, why dont they face the people and negotiate. empathize with the people who are also a big help to them.
...parang hindi ko ata naririnig or nababasa ang DOLE na nakikialam dyan... may comment na ba sila?
oo nga na ang right to strike ay guaranteed by the constitution (not sure) and by law (this one i'm sure)... but then may tamang proseso yan... so unang tanong.. sinunod ba ang proseso? there is such a thing a "Strike vote"... members of the union vote if they want a strike or not... hindi lang officers ah.. lahat ng members...
once they go on strike... may recourse pa ang management.. which yun nga ang ginawa nila... they sought an AJ (assumption of jurisdiction) by the DOLE... legal pa rin to... at sa pagsusuri ng DOLE... may basis for them to assume jurisdiction... pag nag AJ kasi ang DOLE. it means.. back to work, at yung negotiations (CBA man o anong reason ng conflict) gigitna na ang DOLE... sila na ang mag re referee... legal pa rin to.. and i think this is just morally sound... both parties are given their avenues to air their grievances...
ang problema ay kung ginagamit na ang emotions... mahirap na magkaintindihan... pina iinit ang damdamin ng mga tao... shempre using half truths and lies... dagdagan pa na hahakot ng tao pang harang ng gate para walang makapasok...
andun na tayo na laborers have the right to organize and the right to strike... protection nila ito para hindi mayurakan ang kanilang mga karapatan....
pero ang employers o management.. may karapatan din silang kumita... may karapatan silang kumita ng tama sa kanilang ipinuhunan... kapag both parties ay mahinahon na nag uusap.. with all transparency and sincerity... magkaka intindihan...
pero kung may 3rd party na hindi naman talaga kasama sa mga empleyadong nagtra trabaho sa kumpanya... "adviser" sya from the national union na wala namang kaalam alam sa araw araw na operation ng union ng company at ng negosyo.. ayan na.... sa kagustuhang magpasiklab ng "adviser"... magpapakitang gilas sa CBA.. napakataas ang hihingin... sagaran ang mga mass actions... to pressure the management to give in to the demands... pag nag give in ang management sa demands.. shempre natural lang na hihingi ang "adviser" ng konting "tulong" dahil pinag hirapan nya yung pag punta punta sa meeting... at since kung di dahil sa kanya ay malamang hindi magbibigay ang management ng dagdag... so maniniwala naman ang mga empleyado... bibigay naman sila...
ayun.. dito napupunta yung portion ng mga increases nila at signing bonuses... may union dues din yan tuwing sahod na automatic na kaltas... check around in the DOLE offices kung ilan lang na labor unions ang religious sa pag submit ng mga financial statements nila...
this is a whole industry... hanap buhay ito ng mga taong nasa "industriyang" ganito...
-
November 19th, 2004 12:51 AM #46
narinig ko sa radio kanina, the head of the labor unions said when the strike broke out, they were still actually negotiating with the management. hindi lang daw nakapaghintay yung ibang mga laborers, especially those retrenched, kaya nag strike na.
regarding the distribution of the hacienda lands for the agrarian reform, the laborers were actually made owners of the entire CAT estate, i think more than 30%, the rest are retained by the cojuangcos. kung outright binigay yung mga lands sa mga tao, baka ibenta lang nila yun.Signature
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Posts
- 1,326
November 19th, 2004 12:54 AM #47Originally posted by mazdamazda
putik... yan na nga ang sinasabi ko sa mga "labor union" na yan ang kung ano-ano pang mga labor groups.
imbes na magtrabaho sila nang maayos eh nansusulsol lang sila? saan na punta yung 20% para maghakot ng mga pupunta sa picket line?
==========
pero yung ibang naka affiliate sa mga fly by night personalities... binubulsa lang talaga yung collections...
so sad but true... nagagamit ang mga manggagawa... and sa hirap ng buhay... with all the cancer of philippine society... it's a very sad and depressing thought na this will go on...
the system breeds itself...
-
November 19th, 2004 01:01 AM #48
alam ko parang co-owner ang treatment sa kanila... teka hanapin ko lang...
eto nahanap ko...
HLI, a corporate farming firm established in the late 1980s under the stock scheme of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), has more than 5,000 farm workers who are regarded by the Cojuangcos as "co-owners."
FARMWORKERS at the Hacienda Luisita in Tarlac have had enough of the stock-distribution option they’ve been given since 1989. They are now demanding that the 6,453-hectare property be covered by the comprehensive agrarian reform program (CARP).
Carina Espino, secretary-general of the Alyansa ng Manggagawang Bukid sa Hacienda Luisita (Ambala), said the Cojuangcos, owners of the hacienda and one of the oldest and most powerful land-owning families in the country, only offered the stock-distribution option so that it would be exempted from the CARP.
“We were deceived when they [Cojuangcos] encouraged us not to get the lands because we didn’t have money [to till them]. They insisted on the [stock-distribution option], saying that our lives would be better because we would be part of the company,” Espino said. “They said we would earn big through shares of stocks. We now want to till the lands and own them through the CARP.”
Under the stock-distribution option, sugarcane farmers of the hacienda are listed as stockholders, while the Cojuangcos retained management of the hacienda.
“There’s profit sharing, but the money we get is too small because the management’s computation is based on the days we worked,” Espino explained. “Before, we work six to seven days a week; now, we can only work three to four days. Others even work once a week.”
Most of the farmworkers receive P200 a year from their stocks and production shares because of this scheme, Espino said.
The sugarcane plantation has 5,300 workers.
The farmers are also questioning the retrenchment of some 326 permanent employees in August. The retrenched employees are officers of the United Luisita Workers’ Union, an affiliate of Ambala.
“If we’re stockholders of the company, why did they terminate our colleagues? The termination is illegal,” Espino said, noting that the retrenchment was possibly a form of harassment to discourage opposition to the stock-distribution option.
The farmers urged the Department of Agrarian Reform to hasten the inclusion of Hacienda Luisita in the CARP. Party-list congressmen have already filed a resolution directing the “conduct of a general inquiry into the implementation of the stock-distribution-option scheme.”
Republic Act 6657, the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law, allows a landowner to give shares of stocks to his tenants under Sections 11 and 32 for commercial farming and production sharing, while the property is being considered for the CARP
-
November 19th, 2004 01:05 AM #49
teka teka... may nabasa akong bago...
There are many reasons why post-Marcos agrarian reform failed. On top of the list is the lack of financial support needed to run and complete the program. Funding is crucial especially now that the program is in a phase where government must concentrate on privately owned lands that have not been voluntarily offered for sale by their owners.
In this critical phase, government will need sufficient funding to properly compensate landowners. DAR estimates it will need around P117 billion for the remaining 1.19 million hectares.
Against this staggering amount, however, the budget allocation for land acquisition and distribution (LAD) has dwindled in recent years. Last year, LAD budget stood at P4.82 billion; this year it is down to P3.104 billion. As in other matters, government�s budget outlay for LAD is a measure of its commitment to agrarian reform.
ang suwerte naman nila!!!
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Posts
- 1,326
November 19th, 2004 01:07 AM #50Originally posted by boybi
regarding the distribution of the hacienda lands for the agrarian reform, the laborers were actually made owners of the entire CAT estate, i think more than 30%, the rest are retained by the cojuangcos. kung outright binigay yung mga lands sa mga tao, baka ibenta lang nila yun.
may batas tayo na ang tenant sa lupa ay may makukuhang halaga kapag nag decide ang land owner to sell the land... and actually may right of first refusal pa ang tenant sa lupa.. sa kanya dapat una i alok ang lupa.. if ever nalipat sa tenant ang ownership ng land.. usually bine benta din... dahil wala na syang ibang mautangan para sa farm inputs... wala din syang access to markets... benta na lang nya at least may pera na sya...
minsan naman... kapag ang tenant naman ay nakatanggap ng pera dahil na benta na nga yung lupa... saan saan din lang nagagastos yung pera nya...
tama yung report kamakailan lang... kahit mag average ng EIGHT BILLION US DOLLARS (USD 8,000,000,000.00) annually ang remittances ng mga Filipino OFWs sa kani kanilang mga kamag anak dito sa Pinas.. nauuwi din sa wala.... karamihan kasi sa kanila.. ipinupundar sa negosyong pabagsak na... like tricycle.. jeepney... taxi..
nakaka awa ang mga tao.. mga employees namin... minsan lumalapit sa akin.. "Boss.. pautang naman o... pambili ng tricycle... pampasada.. " okay sana.. noble intention... to get more income... but do the math... sa bulakan.. ang takbuhan ng boundary sa tricycle.. Php 80.00 per day... parami ng parami ang tricycle sa kalye.. hindi naman dumadami ang pasahero.. hindi rin dumadami ang kalye... at 80 per day.. compare that to the daily amortization to pay off the loan na ipinagbili ng tricycle... assuming pa yan na araw araw ay ilalabas yung tricycle.. pano kung nagkasakit yung driver? o may sira ang motor? in the end.. minsan.. nagigng service na lang yung tricycle.. pang hatid ng mga bata.. pag mamamalengke... pero di pa rin bayad yung utang na ipinambayad sa tricycle...
and yet paniwalang paniwala pa rin sila na pag may tricycle na sila ay aangat na ang buhay nila...
pasensya na po.. mukhang OT na i just thought i'd like to share some of my experiences with our workers sa factory namin...
Most mall guards already know how to operate power rear tailgates, they just take time to find the...
All New Toyota Corolla Cross