I for myself wouldn't easily swallow this "terrorist did it" that Gondzales and Esperon is trying to feed the public. Their are too many inconsistencies if this is indeed initiated by any of our local terrorist group here. Maybe if the following qeustion has been answered to my satisfaction, I might start believing its a terrorist action. Maximum damaged, maximum casualties..thats the terrorist adaged, to instill terror.

This are just some of the question I'd like to raised.. Anybody?

1. Earlier reports say they found traces of RDX. The explosive material in C-4 is cyclotrimethylene-trinitramine (C3H6N6O6), commonly called RDX (which stands for “royal demolition explosive” or “research development explosive”).
Of course, there is a possibility we will never find out as the water from the sprinklers may have washed out the traces by now.

2. Timing. Why detonate the bomb at a time with the least amount of traffic (people) at the mall?

3. Target Area. Why that area of the mall? Why not the most crowded?

4. Responsibility. It doesn’t make sense, what message does this bombing have? Since RSG is claiming it, what is the message?

5. There was only one bomb. The perpetrators were sure of what they were doing, they were sure of the method. (sure it will explode). Terrorist usually do simultaneous detonation at different areas for maximum impact.

6. Why did Esperon/NSC wait for Trillanes to say something before confirming (?) that the C4 inventory in the military is all accounted for “except for the ones with the Magdalo?”

7. The blast may have destroyed the ceiling/roof because the floor is much thicker/stronger so the shock wave went up (path of least resistance). If damage and casualty number is to be expected, blast should be sideward not upward?

8. Deaths and injuries were more blast related, impact of shock wave and debris from the structure (walls, glass, etc.). No metal pieces usually wrapped around the the explosive to maximize death and injury (otherwise known as shrapnel).

9. This bomb was more “percussive” than "destructive", precisely calculated for maximum noise with minimal collateral damage. Only an expert could have done that either a trained EOD from Military or Mining Engineers (beats me why a miner wants to bomb glorieta though)

Of course, some corners may say we should wait for experts’ findings and rightly so. We wait. But whoever is responsible for this will find out that the people are no longer that gullible, we can see through “experts’” jargon-talk, and sift through the clouds of confusion that seem not to have dissipated.

AND THE POLICE INVESTIGATORS ARE TOO SLOW IN THE CONDUCT OF THEIR INVESTIGATION.
ARE THEIR HANDS TIED OR THE INVESITGATION BEING BUNGLED?
COULD IT BE THAT BOMBING WAS SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN BUT IT WAS NOT INTENDED TO KILL?