Results 11 to 20 of 62
-
-
-
FrankDrebin GuestAugust 13th, 2007 08:34 AM #13
-
August 13th, 2007 10:07 AM #14
-
August 13th, 2007 10:08 AM #15
-
August 13th, 2007 10:19 AM #16
bilib ako kay BF sa iba niyang project pero kung totoo ito tingin ko sa kanya nasira na rin ang ulo.....alam niyo kung ano ang nakaktawa sa mga fire volunteers kahit sila ang mauna sa sunog hinde nila pwede mauna mag patay ng apoy dapat intyin nila yun gov't fire figthers....
-
August 13th, 2007 10:32 AM #17
If its clear that the supposed "volunteer fire brigade" is just using a private car with a siren/blinker, there's no need to ban anything. He can't reason out that he's responding to a fire with a private car (pakita nya muna kung meron firefighting capability ) Just apprehend them for violation of PD 96 period.
-
August 13th, 2007 10:57 AM #18
I think tsismis lang eto at ang sa tingin ko na pinagbabawal nya ay yung mga private car owners na merong wangwang gaya sa mga firetrucks.
-
August 13th, 2007 11:00 AM #19
Tama, may mga overacting talaga na fire volunteers e, tamang pulis pa nga dating ng iba, just apprehend these people.
Pero kung yung mga firetrucks na nag re-respond sa sunog ang iba-ban, ibang usapan na yan. Hindi na kasalanan ng mga fire volunteers just in case na mauna sila sa fire scene at ma-traffic papasok ang BFP.
Sunog ang dapat patayin, at hindi ang pagtulong.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 13
August 13th, 2007 11:05 AM #20puro pa pogi lang yung mga fire volunteer na naka private vehicle w matching wang wang siga sa daan di naman tumutulong nakisawsaw lang
Be careful with channels like "China Observer" on YouTube. There is a clear bias in their posts and...
Xiaomi E-Car