Results 21 to 30 of 31
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 10,620
January 18th, 2006 05:47 PM #219.8 Meter/Second SQ ang falling rate...naks sa physics ko nalaman yan...
-
January 18th, 2006 05:49 PM #22
Lets say this conspiracy theory is true, would they be willing to sacrifice all those people working in the WTC?
-
January 18th, 2006 07:37 PM #23
Honestly eto iniisip ko...
Muka bang dinemolish WTC through controlled demolition? Sakin yes, pati mga buildings sa gilid... C'mon, daming buildings sa gilid na same height ng Bldgs 5-7 bakit yung same land/owner lang gumuho and not the others?
Kahit nga mga slowpoke bumbero dito pumunta sa burning building na charred up building nakatayo padin mga bakal na 1/2" diameter ang poste, yung pang WTC pa kaya...
Pero ang tanong ko lang what for and pano nila natimingan/naplanuhan to do this alongside the 2 plane attacks?
Possible bang hindi militant Islams ang naglipad ng eroplano at alam lang nila na Al Queda will always claim the glory of ANY attacks against the west? Kaya kahit sila gumawa, sasalohin ng Al Queda regardless since Al Queda doesn't care who did it?
Kakaduda din nga yung low volume of passengers ng lahat na sumakay sa 3 hi-jacked planes... Kahit off peak di pa ako nakaranas na 20% lang laman ng large plane sa US... Yung mga 50 seater siguro yung tipong 3 states lang lipad... Went to FL dati off peak, week day from Boston to Daytona halos puno din flight...
Wala din akong nabalitaan na reports sa black boxes ng 3 planes, puros control tower conversation lang diba...
Tapos meron din dati nagsabi na yung plane that crashed na di umabot sa Capitol Hills (yung lumaban ang passengers), na nakatawag pa yung passenger using the plane's cell phone system... If may naghijack ng plane, do you have time (let alone the presence of mind) to grab your AT&T or credit card, punch all those numbers and call?
Di naman pick-up and dial straight ang plane phones diba?
Hmm...
But still... why? For the economy? Dahil nga basta may gera may trabaho dahil sa manufacturing ng arms?
-
January 18th, 2006 08:36 PM #24
Since we're in the topic of conspiracies, lets get the ball rolling.
But still... why? For the economy? Dahil nga basta may gera may trabaho dahil sa manufacturing ng arms?
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 368
January 18th, 2006 10:23 PM #25Originally Posted by theveed
up until now may casualty ang 9/11 na ito... site workers who helped clean the area and find survivors may mga sakit na from exposure daw from dangerous levels of toxins.... some died of black lung and cancers of the esophagus and pancreas.... kawawa naman....
-
January 19th, 2006 07:43 AM #26For the economy? Dahil nga basta may gera may trabaho dahil sa manufacturing ng arms?
In addition, most employees of the above companies belongs to the National Guard or Armed Forces Reserves. Guess where some of my co-workers right now? That's right, Iraq/Afghanistan. To top if off, they get paid wayyy less than what they get from their civilian employer. (i.e. a $50,000 civilian salary person may only get paid $35,000 when called for active duty in the military depending on their rank where most of us are in the $35,000 range.) So, employee like me are actually taking a loss in salary while deployed or serving actively. And why do we sacrifice our paycheck?! ahhh, a reason that most people will never understand,
Originally Posted by ILuvDetailing
FYI: the US imports their oil largely from the following countries. as of January 13, 2006
(thousands barrels per day)
1. Canada (1776)
2. Mexico (1543)
3. Saudi Arabia (1231)
4. Nigeria (1163)
5. Venezuela
6. Angola
7. Iraq (468)
8. Algeria
9. Ecuador
10. Colombia
11. Kuwait (234)
12. UK
13. Norway
14. Equatorial Guinea
15. Trinidad and Tobago
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/p...nt/import.html
US liberated Kuwait but why cant we get enough crude oil from them? Iraq was 'invaded' but how come they arent paying the US with crude oil? Why couldnt the US control Kuwait and Iraq if oil was really the reason for war anyway. If Canada and Mexico is the US largest supplier, why not invade those two countries first?! Afterall, they're a step away from the border. Maybe they're next? hehehe.
Wait, GW is trying to finish what the dad had started :bwahaha:
-
-
January 19th, 2006 11:19 AM #28Originally Posted by theveed
anyway, kung totoo nga ang conspiray theory, kawawa nga ang mga inosente. Ano nga ulit ang tawag ng mga Military doon?! Collateral Damage?
-
couch potato
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,384
January 19th, 2006 11:34 AM #29casualties of war ..
pero parang wala naman ako nabasa na traces of explosives sa site .. give the size of the towers .. dapat considerable amout of explosives ang ginamit to bring it down ..
-
January 19th, 2006 12:02 PM #30
we are into construction... and we demolish structures... just like what theveed said... it is impossible for wtc to be demolished at that rate... and sa tibay ng wtc... it is impossible na mademolish sha basta basta...
the wtc collapsed not because of the impact of the planes... but the extreme heat in the metal beams which came from the burning fuel of the planes... if hindi lumiyab yun hindi gigiba ang wtc... one thing na namiss ng al-queda...
Choice I would have made as well.:nod:
2024 Innova Zenix 2.0 V CVT (non-HEV) vs Innova...