New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,620
    #21
    9.8 Meter/Second SQ ang falling rate...naks sa physics ko nalaman yan...

  2. #22
    Lets say this conspiracy theory is true, would they be willing to sacrifice all those people working in the WTC?

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    13,415
    #23
    Honestly eto iniisip ko...

    Muka bang dinemolish WTC through controlled demolition? Sakin yes, pati mga buildings sa gilid... C'mon, daming buildings sa gilid na same height ng Bldgs 5-7 bakit yung same land/owner lang gumuho and not the others?

    Kahit nga mga slowpoke bumbero dito pumunta sa burning building na charred up building nakatayo padin mga bakal na 1/2" diameter ang poste, yung pang WTC pa kaya...

    Pero ang tanong ko lang what for and pano nila natimingan/naplanuhan to do this alongside the 2 plane attacks?

    Possible bang hindi militant Islams ang naglipad ng eroplano at alam lang nila na Al Queda will always claim the glory of ANY attacks against the west? Kaya kahit sila gumawa, sasalohin ng Al Queda regardless since Al Queda doesn't care who did it?

    Kakaduda din nga yung low volume of passengers ng lahat na sumakay sa 3 hi-jacked planes... Kahit off peak di pa ako nakaranas na 20% lang laman ng large plane sa US... Yung mga 50 seater siguro yung tipong 3 states lang lipad... Went to FL dati off peak, week day from Boston to Daytona halos puno din flight...

    Wala din akong nabalitaan na reports sa black boxes ng 3 planes, puros control tower conversation lang diba...

    Tapos meron din dati nagsabi na yung plane that crashed na di umabot sa Capitol Hills (yung lumaban ang passengers), na nakatawag pa yung passenger using the plane's cell phone system... If may naghijack ng plane, do you have time (let alone the presence of mind) to grab your AT&T or credit card, punch all those numbers and call?

    Di naman pick-up and dial straight ang plane phones diba?

    Hmm...

    But still... why? For the economy? Dahil nga basta may gera may trabaho dahil sa manufacturing ng arms?

  4. #24
    Since we're in the topic of conspiracies, lets get the ball rolling.

    But still... why? For the economy? Dahil nga basta may gera may trabaho dahil sa manufacturing ng arms?
    To give President Bush reason to invade Iraq and control one of the world's major crude oil producers?

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    368
    #25
    Quote Originally Posted by theveed
    Regardless kung ano talaga, kawawa mga inosente...

    up until now may casualty ang 9/11 na ito... site workers who helped clean the area and find survivors may mga sakit na from exposure daw from dangerous levels of toxins.... some died of black lung and cancers of the esophagus and pancreas.... kawawa naman....

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,801
    #26
    For the economy? Dahil nga basta may gera may trabaho dahil sa manufacturing ng arms?
    Defense contractors like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon, Northrop, Titan Corp., CSC, L-3 Comm, ITT do have contracts with the Gov't. But then again, most of these companies' civilian and federal contracts are larger than the Department of Defense contracts. As well, most defense contracts have been negotiated or won before 9/11. So, there is no need to stimulate the economy by weapon production. The company that I am working for never hired massive add'l employees after 9/11. So, that just tells you that creating war does not mean creating jobs. Also, new technology mean less manpower. Way back in WWI and WWII where manpower is needed to create weapons, it was true that war can stimulate the economy.

    In addition, most employees of the above companies belongs to the National Guard or Armed Forces Reserves. Guess where some of my co-workers right now? That's right, Iraq/Afghanistan. To top if off, they get paid wayyy less than what they get from their civilian employer. (i.e. a $50,000 civilian salary person may only get paid $35,000 when called for active duty in the military depending on their rank where most of us are in the $35,000 range.) So, employee like me are actually taking a loss in salary while deployed or serving actively. And why do we sacrifice our paycheck?! ahhh, a reason that most people will never understand,

    Quote Originally Posted by ILuvDetailing
    Since we're in the topic of conspiracies, lets get the ball rolling.

    To give President Bush reason to invade Iraq and control one of the world's major crude oil producers?
    the same conspiracy theorist as the Pearl Harbor attack which is more possible than economy theorist mentioned above.

    FYI: the US imports their oil largely from the following countries. as of January 13, 2006

    (thousands barrels per day)
    1. Canada (1776)
    2. Mexico (1543)
    3. Saudi Arabia (1231)
    4. Nigeria (1163)
    5. Venezuela
    6. Angola
    7. Iraq (468)
    8. Algeria
    9. Ecuador
    10. Colombia
    11. Kuwait (234)
    12. UK
    13. Norway
    14. Equatorial Guinea
    15. Trinidad and Tobago

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/p...nt/import.html

    US liberated Kuwait but why cant we get enough crude oil from them? Iraq was 'invaded' but how come they arent paying the US with crude oil? Why couldnt the US control Kuwait and Iraq if oil was really the reason for war anyway. If Canada and Mexico is the US largest supplier, why not invade those two countries first?! Afterall, they're a step away from the border. Maybe they're next? hehehe.

    Wait, GW is trying to finish what the dad had started :bwahaha:

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    13,415
    #27
    Invade Canada... Hmm, is Canada a country? hehehehe

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    4,801
    #28
    Quote Originally Posted by theveed
    Invade Canada... Hmm, is Canada a country? hehehehe
    lagot ka kay Glenn :hihihi:

    anyway, kung totoo nga ang conspiray theory, kawawa nga ang mga inosente. Ano nga ulit ang tawag ng mga Military doon?! Collateral Damage?

  9. Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,384
    #29
    casualties of war ..

    pero parang wala naman ako nabasa na traces of explosives sa site .. give the size of the towers .. dapat considerable amout of explosives ang ginamit to bring it down ..

  10. Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,067
    #30
    we are into construction... and we demolish structures... just like what theveed said... it is impossible for wtc to be demolished at that rate... and sa tibay ng wtc... it is impossible na mademolish sha basta basta...

    the wtc collapsed not because of the impact of the planes... but the extreme heat in the metal beams which came from the burning fuel of the planes... if hindi lumiyab yun hindi gigiba ang wtc... one thing na namiss ng al-queda...

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
9-11 facts revisited...