Results 11 to 20 of 43
-
June 27th, 2005 02:24 AM #11Originally Posted by M54 Powered
NO GOVERNMENT IN ITS RIGHT MIND WILL DECLARE PUBLICLY THAT IT HAS PAID RANSOM TO TERRORISTS.
Mga chismosa lang ang nag-de-declare nito publicly sa media to create a controversy para may mapag-usapan pampatay-oras.
-
June 27th, 2005 04:04 AM #12
Hindi ako makapaniwala na walang ransom na ibinayad. Biro mo, 8-months at hindi pinatay? Wow, kung iba ibang bansa yan binigyan lang ng 1 week yan or minsan 48 hours at pinapatay na. Pinatay nila co-worker ko dahil alam nila na hindi magbabayad ang US or my company para sa ransom to be delivered in 48hours. Eh kung ako ang kidnapper at nakiusap ang Pinas na bigyan nyo pa silang konting oras, why not. At least magbabayad hindi katulad ng ibang bansa na hindi nagbabayad.
opinyon ko lang naman, kahit walang maniwala :bwahaha:
-
June 27th, 2005 05:25 AM #13
well, the timing is really suspicious. pero at least it saved the life of a pinoy.
and everything else is just a figment of imagination gone wild or hearsay.
-
June 27th, 2005 06:02 AM #14Originally Posted by EL Chicane
i cannot help but wonder why we suddenly released after 8 months. did the kidnappers suddenly give up? the last time we heard this kind of thing happen, the philippines did pay a ransom - it was in the form of troop withdrawals and not cash, but a ransom nonetheless.
so past history considered, you have to wonder whether there's any truth to these so-called chismis
-
June 27th, 2005 07:12 AM #15Originally Posted by M54 Powered
We all know as intelligent "thinking" pinoys that Tarongoy's release (whether ransom was paid or not) does not have any effect on Arroyo's wiretap scandal. Only gullible people will start professing that Arroyo did not cheat in the last elections because she paid the ransom for Tarongoy's release.
Because the logic in such a case is so stupid and irrelevant, it's not really worth the time to find out if this chismis is true or not.
-
June 27th, 2005 08:30 AM #16
waste of tax payer's money.
its his choice kung pumunta siya sa Iraq. he very well knew the risk that he had to take when he went there.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 123
June 27th, 2005 08:34 AM #17Kawawa naman ang mga jueteng lords. Siguradong papadagdag ng payola si PGMA para makabawi.
-
June 27th, 2005 08:57 AM #18
Ito naman ang sa akin... alam naman nilang delikado dun bat pa sila pupunta? Tapos aasa sila sa gobyerno na isalba sila eh kadami nang problema dito sa loob, sasali pa sila.
Kung totoong nagbayad, sayang ang pera. Maraming paglalaanan...
Opinion lang po. Peace tayo.
-
June 27th, 2005 11:32 AM #19Originally Posted by EL Chicane
i made the comment because i travel to Asia a lot and though i am from the US, i am obviously Pinoy - i would hate to be in Pakistan or someplace like that and be a target for people who have some kind of agenda because they know they can exert control over the Philippine government.
i thought that would be obvious because of my comment about being "fair game", but obviously (you like this word a lot, don't you?) you made up your mind about me before you got to the second sentence of my post. congratulations. and thank you for implying that i am non-intelligent and non-thinking....i wonder whose logic is stupid now?
anyway, the damage was already done with Angelo dela Cruz. everyone knows now exactly how to influence Philippine foreign policy.Last edited by empy; June 27th, 2005 at 11:49 AM.
-
June 27th, 2005 11:54 AM #20
Aysus. chismis or not... whatever-in-the-name-of-christian!!
Yung kay Angelo dela Cruz...mejo OA nga nangyari dun. super patronizing ng government sa kanya. Obviously, i have no point here. i just wanted to post.
I don't know why people continue to try and take Kennon Road from Rosario. Its perpetually being...
2023 Toyota Wigo