^
32B ba yang si gaga?![]()
yes
no
not sure
Attending as part of the protesters.
sumawsaw pa si mayor flower shirt, at si macalintal.
at si abante (sino ba yun?)......![]()
They're worse than the f*cking Taliban! Stupid, self-righteous, self-appointed, so-called guardians of morality, kuno.
So predictable.... what else is new with the Philippine TaliBAN Catholic Church and their TaliBAN bishops?
source: Obispo sa Maynila, tutol sa concert ni Lady Gaga sa Pinas | GMA News Online | The Go-To Site for Filipinos EverywhereObispo sa Maynila, tutol sa concert ni Lady Gaga sa Pinas
May 18, 2012 6:41pm
1164 7 Email0 ShareThis1171
Tutol si Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo sa pagdaraos ng konsiyerto sa bansa ng kontrobersiyal na International artist na si Lady Gaga.
Ayon kay Bishop Pabillo, chairman ng National Secretariat for Social Action (NASSA) ng Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), hindi makatutulong ang pagtatanghal ni Lady Gaga para maitaas ang moralidad ng mga kabataan.
“Talaga namang si Lady Gaga ay hindi magandang impluwensiya sa atin. Yung mga values niya ay hindi ‘yan ang values ng mga kabataan natin. At kung hahayaan natin at hindi ikokontrol ‘yan ng ating pamahalaan ay talagang masisisra ang values natin," paliwanag ni Pabillo sa panayam ng Radio Veritas nitong Biyernes.
Iginiit din ng Obispo na hindi maituturing freedom of expression ang ginagawa ni Gaga dahil hindi umano maganda ang mga ipinakikita nito.
“Dapat magprotesta tayo diyan. Ang pamahalaan sana natin ay mas maging malakas sa Indonesia at South Korea ay hindi siya pinayagan (mag-concert) dahil nakita ng pamahalaan nila na hindi magandang impluwensiya (si Lady Gaga)," dagdag niya.
Nakatakdang ganapin ang pagtatanghal ni Lady Gaga sa darating na Mayo 21-22 sa Mall of Asia sa Pasay City.
Maging si dating Philippine Ambassador to the Vatican Henrietta de Villa ay nakikiisa sa panawagan ng iba’t-ibang sektor na i-boykot ang konsiyerto ni Lady Gaga.
Itinuturing ni de Villa na pambabastos sa pananampalataya ng mga Katoliko sa ilang gawa ng international singer.
“Ako’y pipirma bilang personal conviction ko ‘yan doon sa campaign to ban her from coming here in country for a concert. Terrible naman, tayo po ay Catholic country pero tingnan mo naman ang pag-insulto sa ating pananampalataya at talagang tinatapakan niya ang atin Panginoon," paliwanag ni De Villa.
Umaasa siya na tutularan ng mga Pinoy ang mga mamamayan ng Indonesia, na magkaroon ng national conviction para huwag payagang mag-concert si Lady Gaga sa kanilang bansa.
Una rito, pinuna ng ilang religious group ang ilang MTV ni Lady Gaga na nagpapakita umano ng pagkopya kay Kristo, imahe ng mga alagad ng kadiliman, at malalaswang gawain.
Una rito, inihayag ni Pasay City Mayor Antonio Calixto na hindi niya papayagan na magkaroon ng obscenities o nudity sa concert ni Lady Gaga.
Ito umano ang mahigpit na bilin ng alkalde sa ibinigay na permit upang payagang makapagtahal si Lady Gaga sa MOA sa Pasay. - MP/FRJ, GMA News
Last edited by ghosthunter; May 19th, 2012 at 09:03 AM.
ang kikitid ng isip ng mga taong ito..
ano ba iniisip nila, lahat ng tao dito sa pinas kristiyano? paano naman yun iba ang paniniwala?
it's more fun in the Philippines talaga
Porket Judas kasi yung title ng isang song niya eh. Dami talaga illiterate sa English, hindi magkakaganito kung inintindi nila mga kanta niya.
Ang dami din talaga ang hindi nagbabasa ng bibliya kaya hindi alam ang line between demonic and wisdom of God.
"For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart." - Hebrews 4:12
I was in Moa complex earlier this morning. May mga board-up pa. tuloy ba talaga?
source: Lady Gaga vs. the Bible: An Obscene-Off | Filipino FreethinkersLady Gaga vs. the Bible: An Obscene-Off
Posted on 19 May 2012 by Red Tani.
Lady Gaga will perform in the Philippines, but not if some bigots can help it. Biblemode Youth Philippines has gone on Bible Mode, calling for the blasphemous concert to be canceled. Their protest leader, former Congressman Benny Abante, threatened to file a lawsuit if she sings “Judas,” a performance protesters consider obscene, and therefore, illegal.
Penal Censorship
Former Manila Mayor Jose Atienza agrees, saying that such obscenity is punishable by six months to six years in prison under the Revised Penal Code. According to Article 201 — which was also used against Mideo Cruz’s Jesus-Penis-Juxtaposition in Polyteismo — obscenity applies to immoral displays that
Judas vs. Jesus(1) glorify criminals or condone crimes;
(2) serve no other purpose but to satisfy the market for violence, lust or ****ography;
(3) offend any race or religion;
(4) tend to abet traffic in and use of prohibited drugs; and
(5) are contrary to law, public order, morals, good customs, established policies, lawful orders, decrees and edicts.
The music video of “Judas” depicts “Jesus and his disciples as a motorcycle gang and tells the story of Jesus’ betrayal, with Lady Gaga playing the role of Jesus’ girlfriend, who is torn between her loyalty to Jesus and her love for Judas.”
Out of the 5 criteria for obscenity, “Judas” is guilty — by my judgment — of just one: (3) offending any race or religion. (1) doesn’t count (unless the motorcycle gang Jesus belonged to was a criminal one). Nor does (2) because beyond the stunts and gimmicks, many people actually like her music. (4) is arguable but unlikely. And (5) refers to laws, public order, and other supposedly non-sectarian rules — not the doctrines and opinions of a single sect or religion.
Fans vs. Fanatics
Lady Gaga is no stranger to such controversy — South Koreans protested to prevent infecting the youth with “homo***uality and ****ography,” and in Indonesia, the Islamic Defenders Front said “they were ready to die to stop the concert.”
But should the concert be canceled — like in Indonesia — or censored — like what could happen here — it’s not Lady Gaga who’ll be affected most — it’s the fans. The right to freedom of expression implies the right to freely access artistic expressions in their uncensored form. To defend their right to enjoy an artist they admire — and to protect the ideals of free speech in general — Lady Gaga’s fans should counter-protest, and I’m suggesting this is how they do it.
Gaga vs. Bible
They should file a case against Biblemode Youth Philippines for giving the youth access to the most obscene artistic expression ever made: the Bible. Compared to the Bible, a Lady Gaga concert looks like an episode of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. No one will dispute this, at least not anyone who has read the Bible — cover to cover, not just homily material. The Bible is so obscene that other than criterion (4), it is guilty of violating criteria (1), (3), and (5) many times over, and of (2) as well — unless you consider “being terrified of God” as a valid purpose.
The Bible is full of obscenity, filled with verses and verses not only of *** and violence, but every form of injustice, intolerance, and incitement of hatred against women, LGBTs, and even children.
I know many of you won’t read the Bible — especially if you’re a Bible-thumping Christian like Manny Pacquiao — so I’ll list just one example for each criterion of obscenity (except the fourth) to prove that more than Lady Gaga, the Bible is deserving of censorship, if not banning.
(1) glorify criminals or condone crimes
The Bible has many graphic stories that depict and even condone slavery, murder, genocide, torture, infanticide, and other atrocities that any non-psychopathic person would consider criminal. Here’s one.
To gain Saul’s approval, not to mention his daughter, Michal, David and his men not only killed a hundred Philistines, they also performed postmortem circumcisions, offering the Philistine foreskins — the 100 they individually counted — as bride price.
(2) serve no other purpose but to satisfy the market for violence, lust or ****ography
Banging on a door, some wicked men wanted to gang rape a man, who was a guest in the house. The hospitable homeowner offered his own daughter and the guest’s concubine to be gang raped instead.
The wicked men didn’t agree, so the homeowner pushed the concubine out from the house into the wicked men. Gang rape ensues. The next morning the homeowner, finding the concubine dead, did the sensible thing and chopped up her body, limb from limb, into twelve parts before mailing them to all the areas of Israel.
Does the story have any other purpose “but to satisfy the market for violence, lust or ****ography”? And even if this did teach some moral lesson (pray tell, what?), the violence is just too gratuitous for an allegory.
(3) offend any race or religion and (5) are contrary to law, public order, morals, good customs, established policies, lawful orders, decrees and edicts.
God hates the Midianites because they worship Baal of Peor. He told Moses to kill all Midianite leaders, or else, he’ll keep punishing them with a plague. So Moses ordered Israel’s judges to kill Israelites who converted to Baal worship.
One day, an Israelite man brought a Midianite woman into camp. Phinehas, not a judge, followed the couple into their tent. As they were having interracial interreligion ***, Phinehas thrust a sphere through both of their bodies. (Talk about double penetration.) For taking things into his own hands instead of letting the state (judges) enforce the law, God rewarded Phinehas and stopped His plague.
Child ****ography
Any one of these stories depicts something more immoral than any stunt Lady Gaga could pull, and this is but a small sample of similar stories scattered in both the Old and New Testament. What’s worse, the Bible does more than depict immorality — it condones and even justifies it.
Yet with all the ****ography and gratuitous violence in the Bible, it’s probably the easiest book for anyone to access — children included. (It’s a good thing children generally think the Bible is boring. That old copy at home won’t be so dusty if the children knew there was enough *** and gore in it to make most video games dull in comparison.)
Some may argue that the stories aren’t so bad when read in context. But imagine what would happen if a fundamentalist studio were to show a movie depicting these scenes. Would it get a PG rating from the MTRCB? Would it be any different if there was narration that put the scenes into context? And what difference does putting it in book form make? Didn’t fundamentalist groups also call for the censorship of Harry Potter, Da Vinci Code, and the novels of Jose Rizal?
I’d be interested to see the outcome of such a case should Lady Gaga fans follow my suggestion. If they don’t, maybe it’s FF that should challenge the Bible’s immunity to censorship. In any case, somebody should do it. Think of the children.
yun unang single kaya ni lady gaga na just dance hindi nila ginamit sa mga christmas party nila o anuman party na pinuntahan nila.
sigurado ako sumayaw si *KICKOFF sa kanta na yun