Eh... the only thing FHM doesn't show these days are the "beavers" ... whoops, di na uso yun... puro "shaved" na... that Playboy shows.
In fact, I'm appalled at how much skin FHM is allowed to show, and they sell these at Magazine stands in malls?
Don't get me wrong, I'm no prude, but the form of nudity in these magazines carries negative connotations and stereotypes, which adversely affect the social inter-relations of younger, more malleable minds. (it's disappointing to see how many young men nowadays see women as ***ual objects ONLY)
As a "Catholic" nation, we're so gung ho about nudism in movies, where you can deny entry to minors, why do they allow it on the streets, where any minor can pick up an FHM or a tabloid, or one of the many FHM wannabees (RED, etc) and see women in all their glory? FHM should be sold with those cover protectors, like they use for Playboy and other *aherm* Men's magazines. That would actually allow more nudity on the cover... and even more inside... Playboy Philippines, anyone?
Then
maybe I'd buy it.
