New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 94

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,962
    #1
    I went to the Mazda Premium Experience pavilion at BGC and drove the new CX-30. One thing I immediately noticed with the crossover is the front visibility, so much better than my 2018 Mazda3. My sister who have driven the 2nd gen CX5 also pointed out that visibility is so much better with the CX-30. It seems that the front pillar is less thicker than the other skyactiv models, effectively reducing front blindspot.

    The speedometer dashboard's height seems lower than the new 2019 Mazda3, making the front view much better for the driver.

    The 2.0 liter Skyactiv engine is still very good, rev happy and very responsive. We also drove the 1.5 liter 2019 Mazda 3 and find it less responsive than the 2.0 liter CX-30.

    Braking is as smooth as butter with the CX-30. My sister told me that she finds the CX-30 braking feel so much better than the CX-5. The CX-5's braking is somewhat strong for her taste, a bit difficult to control compared with the Mazda3 and CX-30.

    The only thing I don't like with the CX-30 is the iStop feature. The base model comes with it unfortunately. Also there's no rear cabin aircon vents unlike with the 2019 base model Mazda3.

    The CX-30 is likely going to be Mazda PH's newest bestseller! I instantly liked it much more than my M3.




  2. Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    12,396
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by jojopad View Post
    I went to the Mazda Premium Experience pavilion at BGC and drove the new CX-30. One thing I immediately noticed with the crossover is the front visibility, so much better than my 2018 Mazda3. My sister who have driven the 2nd gen CX5 also pointed out that visibility is so much better with the CX-30. It seems that the front pillar is less thicker than the other skyactiv models, effectively reducing front blindspot.

    The speedometer dashboard's height seems lower than the new 2019 Mazda3, making the front view much better for the driver.

    The 2.0 liter Skyactiv engine is still very good, rev happy and very responsive. We also drove the 1.5 liter 2019 Mazda 3 and find it less responsive than the 2.0 liter CX-30.

    Braking is as smooth as butter with the CX-30. My sister told me that she finds the CX-30 braking feel so much better than the CX-5. The CX-5's braking is somewhat strong for her taste, a bit difficult to control compared with the Mazda3 and CX-30.

    The only thing I don't like with the CX-30 is the iStop feature. The base model comes with it unfortunately. Also there's no rear cabin aircon vents unlike with the 2019 base model Mazda3.

    The CX-30 is likely going to be Mazda PH's newest bestseller! I instantly liked it much more than my M3.



    Nice review. When & what color are you getting, sir?[emoji4]

    Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

  3. Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,962
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by travajante View Post
    Nice review. When & what color are you getting, sir?[emoji4]

    Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk
    Haha I really want to get one but I'm still on a long term relationship with my BN M3 for at least 3 years more. My sister is likely to get one, the test drive experience really convinced her. She likes the deep crystal blue mica but I prefer the polymetal gray.

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    12,396
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by jojopad View Post
    Haha I really want to get one but I'm still on a long term relationship with my BN M3 for at least 3 years more. My sister is likely to get one, the test drive experience really convinced her. She likes the deep crystal blue mica but I prefer the polymetal gray.
    Try to technically convince her. Polymetal would be easier to maintain than the darker deep blue.
    As colors move closer to black, where the pigment of carbon black is used, paint will relatively be softer than white which uses the harder titanium dioxide. In the Mohs Hardness Scale where 1 is talc, 10 is diamond, Carbon Black is just 2. Softer than fingernails. Titanium dioxide is rated 7. That's why you get more of those beautiful swirls on black vehicles.[emoji4] Good luck, jojo sir![emoji4]


    Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

  5. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by jojopad View Post
    I went to the Mazda Premium Experience pavilion at BGC and drove the new CX-30. One thing I immediately noticed with the crossover is the front visibility, so much better than my 2018 Mazda3. My sister who have driven the 2nd gen CX5 also pointed out that visibility is so much better with the CX-30. It seems that the front pillar is less thicker than the other skyactiv models, effectively reducing front blindspot.

    The speedometer dashboard's height seems lower than the new 2019 Mazda3, making the front view much better for the driver.

    The 2.0 liter Skyactiv engine is still very good, rev happy and very responsive. We also drove the 1.5 liter 2019 Mazda 3 and find it less responsive than the 2.0 liter CX-30.

    Braking is as smooth as butter with the CX-30. My sister told me that she finds the CX-30 braking feel so much better than the CX-5. The CX-5's braking is somewhat strong for her taste, a bit difficult to control compared with the Mazda3 and CX-30.

    The only thing I don't like with the CX-30 is the iStop feature. The base model comes with it unfortunately. Also there's no rear cabin aircon vents unlike with the 2019 base model Mazda3.

    The CX-30 is likely going to be Mazda PH's newest bestseller! I instantly liked it much more than my M3.



    which color is this? it looks good with the chromed grill. the proportions look great with the long nose. hows the nvh?

  6. Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,962
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by StockEngine View Post
    which color is this? it looks good with the chromed grill. the proportions look great with the long nose. hows the nvh?
    That's the polymetal gray color.

    NVH is way better than the previous Mazda3 gen, at par with the 2nd gen CX5.

  7. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,234
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by jojopad View Post
    NVH is way better than the previous Mazda3 gen, at par with the 2nd gen CX5.
    Good enough that people beside you won't know you're rakking Aegis while stuck in traffic haha Sa BM/BN kasi rinig pati lyrics [emoji14]



    Sent from my SM-A605G using Tapatalk

  8. Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    12,396
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnM View Post
    Good enough that people beside you won't know you're rakking Aegis while stuck in traffic haha Sa BM/BN kasi rinig pati lyrics [emoji14]



    Sent from my SM-A605G using Tapatalk
    Which of their songs do you usually belt in static traffic, brother John?[emoji4]

    Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

  9. Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,962
    #9
    Good point sir travs! I'll take note of this. Thanks for the detailed info! [emoji106]

  10. Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    12,396
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by jojopad View Post
    Good point sir travs! I'll take note of this. Thanks for the detailed info! [emoji106]
    Anytime, good sir![emoji120]

    Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

  11. Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    10
    #11
    Saw this in the flesh in their BGC display. Had the same WOW factor when I first saw the current Mazda 3.

    To me, it feels like more of a raised sedan rather than a crossover. Current crossovers are too... voluptuous (?), still a bit spherical/cube-like in form. The CX-30 looks sleek and slim, almost like a raised Mazda 3 hatchback.

    Price-wise, the base model is cheap at 1.49M, but the premium features and all the bells and whistles come in at 1.9M which might be a bit steep at least for this class. However, if you view this as a premium vehicle as opposed to just your average, utilitarian daily hauler, the price might be ok.

  12. Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,130
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by ianroy View Post
    Saw this in the flesh in their BGC display. Had the same WOW factor when I first saw the current Mazda 3.

    To me, it feels like more of a raised sedan rather than a crossover. Current crossovers are too... voluptuous (?), still a bit spherical/cube-like in form. The CX-30 looks sleek and slim, almost like a raised Mazda 3 hatchback.

    Price-wise, the base model is cheap at 1.49M, but the premium features and all the bells and whistles come in at 1.9M which might be a bit steep at least for this class. However, if you view this as a premium vehicle as opposed to just your average, utilitarian daily hauler, the price might be ok.
    I think the base model is ok. Could have been priced lower and remove some more useless features but overall I can say that “I f***s wit it.”

  13. Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    42
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by ianroy View Post
    ..However, if you view this as a premium vehicle as opposed to just your average, utilitarian daily hauler, the price might be ok.
    This is actually what I am hinting on why the price is like this.

    But first, may I know what is the definition of a premium vehicle? Is the CX5/CX30 on this level already? Is it like comparing it to a BMW, etc? What is the advantage/disadvantage of owning one aside from the cost (Sorry if these are ignorant/novice questions) Thank you!

  14. Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    12,396
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by fireproofjat View Post
    This is actually what I am hinting on why the price is like this.

    But first, may I know what is the definition of a premium vehicle? Is the CX5/CX30 on this level already? Is it like comparing it to a BMW, etc? What is the advantage/disadvantage of owning one aside from the cost (Sorry if these are ignorant/novice questions) Thank you!
    Euro premiums? The differences? Higher reliability & lower cost of ownership of nippon cars. The Skyactiv platform has been around long enough to prove both. Mazda is punching above its weight. Check them in the metal to see what their kodo design language is about, sir.

    Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

  15. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,851
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by fireproofjat View Post
    This is actually what I am hinting on why the price is like this.

    But first, may I know what is the definition of a premium vehicle? Is the CX5/CX30 on this level already? Is it like comparing it to a BMW, etc? What is the advantage/disadvantage of owning one aside from the cost (Sorry if these are ignorant/novice questions) Thank you!
    For its price, you get the premium feel sir. At least for my cx-5...


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  16. Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,962

  17. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    27,624
    #17

  18. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,234
    #18
    Lower-budget Macan: The 22 Mazda CX-3 Feels Like A Lower-Budget Porsche Macan

    Sent from my SM-A605G using Tapatalk

  19. Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    12,396
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnM View Post
    Lower-budget Macan: The 22 Mazda CX-3 Feels Like A Lower-Budget Porsche Macan

    Sent from my SM-A605G using Tapatalk
    Same sentiments...
    The 22 Mazda CX-3 is a crossover you’ll actually enjoy driving – Ars Technica

    Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

  20. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,851
    #20

    Cx-30 and cx-5
    Tagilid lang hahaha...



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

2020 cx-30