Results 11 to 20 of 28
-
October 23rd, 2015 05:00 PM #11
I agree. I guess I'll have to go for 04-05 model AT tranny. Para din naddrive ng asawa ko. But I'll try to peek at other brands also. The ones you mentioned. Kaya lang hindi mas mahal spare parts nila? Thanks again.
-
-
October 24th, 2015 11:07 PM #13
-
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 98
October 25th, 2015 11:23 AM #15I currently own a 2004 Vti model and previously a 1997 civic. Go for the later model especially if automatic. I'm happy with the performance of my matic 2004 VTi and parts is not a problem. Go for the eagle eye model like mine.
-
October 25th, 2015 12:58 PM #16
How about performance wise? Which car do you suggest guys? 2006 mazda 3 AT or VTEC 04-05 AT?
Factors are:
Handling
Speed
FC
AC cooling pertformance during at the peak of the sun in the middle of the day
Kindly anyone? Thanks.
-
October 25th, 2015 03:03 PM #17
^^^ Somebody posted a comparison before of the 2.0L versions of the Mazda3 and Civic of that era (2004-2005). The Mazda3 offers better handling and lower end torque but the Civic has more power at the top end (greater top speed). In terms of FC, the Mazda3 2.0L is about the same as its lower end 1.6L brother (6-8 km/L on city routes). In the case of the Civic, the 1.6L models offers a good mix of performance and FC for the 1.6L model. The 2.0L Civic ES has the K20 VTEC DOHC engine and it is not known to be fuel efficient and will be more like the Mazda3 2.0L model in terms of FC.
-
-
October 26th, 2015 07:44 AM #19
We have 2004 honda civic AT for almost 2 yrs now, bought it second hand, ok naman soj
-
October 26th, 2015 07:46 AM #20
Ok naman so far, major repair lang talaga nung bumigay transmission, we bought it kasi at 83k kms, pero now ok na ulit good as new na ulit yung transmission
I don't feel any diffeence ng DCT Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(2023) Ford Territory