All New 2016 Civic

**viper888** · February 16th, 2016 10:20 PM

At least the Focus now has a rival in the power stakes, but the CVT is a big question mark. The bigger question mark is the price. They have to price it well or else they will price it too near a discounted Subaru WRX.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

**RF02** · February 16th, 2016 10:28 PM

Originally Posted by viper888

At least the Focus now has a rival in the power stakes, but the CVT is a big question mark. The bigger question mark is the price. They have to price it well or else they will price it too near a discounted Subaru WRX.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

how much po yun discount ng wrx ngayon sir?

**viper888** · February 16th, 2016 10:52 PM

Originally Posted by RF02

how much po yun discount ng wrx ngayon sir?

Alam ko malaki sa mt. Sa cvt hindi ata.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

**baniparairo01** · February 17th, 2016 05:04 AM

Currently own one.. medyo dami pang issues na kailangang ayusin especially yung infotainment system + medyo sluggish cvt. Nasanay kasi ako sa CVT ng Lancer GTA na linear, etong CVT ng Civic, medyo may surge ng kaunti.. hindi ko lang alan kung dahil ba sa tapak ko sa gas or ganun talaga.

Pero sa highway, panalo!!! ramdam ang turbo kahit paano.

**glenn manikis** · February 17th, 2016 06:14 AM

Originally Posted by baniparairo01

Currently own one.. medyo dami pang issues na kailangang ayusin especially yung infotainment system + medyo sluggish cvt. Nasanay kasi ako sa CVT ng Lancer GTA na linear, etong CVT ng Civic, medyo may surge ng kaunti.. hindi ko lang alan kung dahil ba sa tapak ko sa gas or ganun talaga.

Pero sa highway, panalo!!! ramdam ang turbo kahit paano.

Sluggish? You mean may time parang walang turbo?

**StockEngine** · February 17th, 2016 06:18 AM

Tapak lng siguro. All the American reviews praise the earthdreams cvt.

Whats your average mpg bro? Over 35?

**EQAddict** · February 17th, 2016 07:44 AM

I'm thinking 1.2m for the turbo......

I saw a video posted somewhere here. It's faster in all respects (standing start, rolling start, rolling cruise, in gear acceleration, etc) than the previous generation 200hp NA civic. Wow

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

**StockEngine** · February 17th, 2016 07:50 AM

Originally Posted by EQAddict

I'm thinking 1.2m for the turbo......

I saw a video posted somewhere here. It's faster in all respects (standing start, rolling start, rolling cruise, in gear acceleration, etc) than the previous generation 200hp NA civic. Wow

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Better than the mazda6 2.5 also 😊

**EQAddict** · February 17th, 2016 07:58 AM

Wonder if it's worth upgrading my jazz to this. I love the space and ease of driving and parking of the Jazz. It's fun too.

But it's not fast. Hehe

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

**Egan101** · February 17th, 2016 08:17 AM

Some tests in the US were claiming a 7 second 0-60kmh sprint. That's very quick for a compact, even quicker than most midsize with 2.4L-2.5L NA engines (8 seconds average). The Focus 1.5L Ecoboost may have the advantage in power & torque but it is heavier by 100kg. The tests for the Focus states around 8+ seconds for a 0-100kmh sprint. What Honda did is kept the weight of the Honda FB (1200-1300 kg) and made the car with a longer wheelbase and wider wheel track.

If the Civic 1.5L turbo is priced around 1.2M to 1.3M, that would surely take a big chunk of the sales of the TOTL compact market.