Source of Traffic in C5 - whose guilty

[japeeps]

Everyday scenario in C5 flyover to makati...

Trucks, Private Vehicle, Taxi, Luxury Cars (lalo na!!!), UV express

it is their habit na mag merge left to inner lanes dedicated para sa papasok sa flyover... IGNORING THE YELLOW LANE
Usually ginagawa nila to para mas madali sila makapasok sa flyover since yung outer lane eh mas mabilis kesa sa lane papasok sa flyover.
Ignoring those cars na NAGIGITGIT para lang sa sarili nilang GINHAWA...

[jresperanza]

illegal merging ignoring the yellow lane ang guilty dito...

basta may merging may heavy traffic!!! hopeless na ito unless may maparusahan talaga

[stickers]

Trucks driven away from edsa.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

[R.Paul]

Pag diyaan route ko hindi na ako pumipila sa bridge lalo na sa umaga. Dun ako lagi sa rightmost lane tas sa ilalim daan ko.

Sent from my GT-I9082

[compact]

Palamuti lang ang mga traffic enforcer dyan, nakapila lang sa gitna, dapat pinapaderetso nila yung nanggagaling sa kanan at huwag payagang mag merge sa kaliwa.

Sent from my MyPhone Agua Iceberg using Tapatalk

[Mguy]

You have to analyze rin why do other cars and trucks do that. If all keep into two lanes only, that line will reach lagpas UP. Even if they squeeze in at the foot of the flyover or a kilometer away, the cause of the slow traffic are the trucks that are managing to climb the flyover at a very slow pace. I'm not sure if letting the trucks go under would alleviate the traffic because they are just too many of them.

[shelu]

actually, if we will try to ponder deeper on that, it is poor engineering design. in short, ang mga gumawa ng mga fly-over sa atin, di nag iisip. puro short term solutions. we all know tokyo has more people, more cars with the same space as the NCR. but we can't see bad traffic condition like ours. isa pa, failure din tayo sa enforcement at education ng motorist. all we can do is to grin and bear it. ang motto ng drivers sa NCR, ang mainis, talo.

[stavros]

actually, if we will try to ponder deeper on that, it is poor engineering design. in short, ang mga gumawa ng mga fly-over sa atin, di nag iisip. puro short term solutions. we all know tokyo has more people, more cars with the same space as the NCR. but we can't see bad traffic condition like ours. isa pa, failure din tayo sa enforcement at education ng motorist. all we can do is to grin and bear it. ang motto ng drivers sa NCR, ang mainis, talo.

Ponder deeper ka pa dyan, layo naman ng comparison mo. Mas madami sa Tokyo na trains ang gamit or bicycles. ang Car registration dun is very expensive so youll have second thoughts in getting one.

[vinj]

Actually, the C5 Bagong Ilog flyover is at least one lane short to handle road traffic capacity. Add to that the slow movement of vehicles after it as cars approach the Bayani U-turn flyovers and Fort exit. I actually go straight under that flyover at times... okay din naman and a little traffic management and directing vehicles under can actually help improve traffic flow IMO..

On EDSA - Shaw, notorious sa pag cut and merge ng walang pakialaman from the rightmost lane to the underpass are the GTEx vans usually... along with private cars and a handful of buses. Inutil ang MMDA to do anything about it (source of traffic is usually the Boni Ave area where buses clog the road). Again, if they can keep buses on the first two lanes of EDSA - Shaw ibabaw, excess vehicles can actually take ibabaw to go straight even during rush hours.

[japeeps]

You have to analyze rin why do other cars and trucks do that. If all keep into two lanes only, that line will reach lagpas UP. Even if they squeeze in at the foot of the flyover or a kilometer away, the cause of the slow traffic are the trucks that are managing to climb the flyover at a very slow pace. I'm not sure if letting the trucks go under would alleviate the traffic because they are just too many of them.

di sya hahaba.. kase ung traffic nasa baba lang flyover pag akyat bumibilis... kung walang sisingit hindi ma congest yung paanan ng flyover... eh di tuloy tuloy ang takbo... kaya nga may yellow lane eh para ma distribute ung merging kesa naman imerge mo lahat sa paanan ng flyover...

[Mguy]

di sya hahaba.. kase ung traffic nasa baba lang flyover pag akyat bumibilis... kung walang sisingit hindi ma congest yung paanan ng flyover... eh di tuloy tuloy ang takbo... kaya nga may yellow lane eh para ma distribute ung merging kesa naman imerge mo lahat sa paanan ng flyover...

Hahaba rin yan dahil sa volume. Daming sasakyan eh. Obviously pag umaakyat, bibilis yan kasi wala ng merging traffic. Pero yun bilis nya is not enough to alleviate the flow of traffic, lalu na kung truck na mabigat ang karga. If the yellow lane is followed and it is only 1km long, merging will happen before the 1km mark. So ganoon rin. It should have been a 3 lane flyover to begin with.

[japeeps]

Hahaba rin yan dahil sa volume. Daming sasakyan eh. Obviously pag umaakyat, bibilis yan kasi wala ng merging traffic. Pero yun bilis nya is not enough to alleviate the flow of traffic, lalu na kung truck na mabigat ang karga. If the yellow lane is followed and it is only 1km long, merging will happen before the 1km mark. So ganoon rin. It should have been a 3 lane flyover to begin with.

but why is it pag may naghuhuli maayos ang takbo... and I notice na kanya kanya silang singit pero not in the same place... kung may 1km stretch ng jagged line distributed yung merging... lalo na pag malayo pa lang natanaw na nila ung enforcer...

kesa naman na mag umpukan sila sa paanan ng flyover di ba... lalong congested... before I posted this I observe this for 2-3 mos.. not to mention I take this route everyday... logic lang yan... mahaba pero di hamak na mas mabilis ang andar or maikli nga pero embudo naman... not to mention the accident at gitgitan...

[leenamnam]

Hahaba rin yan dahil sa volume. Daming sasakyan eh. Obviously pag umaakyat, bibilis yan kasi wala ng merging traffic. Pero yun bilis nya is not enough to alleviate the flow of traffic, lalu na kung truck na mabigat ang karga. If the yellow lane is followed and it is only 1km long, merging will happen before the 1km mark. So ganoon rin. It should have been a 3 lane flyover to begin with.

Yea, pag tuunan sana nila ng pansin ang mga tulay sa lansangan ng metro manila. Napag-iiwanan na ng panahon lalo na yung mga 2 lanes fly-over with matching yung divider na bakal na madulas, specifically along magallanes na delikado hindi lang sa cages, kundi lalong lalo na sa motorcyle riders pag maulan o nabasa yung mga yun.