Counterflowing Jaguar driver enrages netizens

[shadow]

Let us not mistake the trees for the forest. We all jump the gun here on an off tangent notion that— he drove a fancy car; he was Chinese; he was rich; he was powerful. But Joey Padiernos was not what we thought he really was. We bashed too soon. He was simply a man on the street who dreamed of, or had the illusion of, being somebody, not unlike Don Quixote De la Mancha. Had we known at the outset of who he was, would he get the same attention or flak he had been getting of late? Abuse or any of its kindred is not a character flaw peculiar only to the rich or powerful or to the Chinese or to those who drove and owned a fancy car— a man on the street could be that offensive too, or even much worse. Let Padiernos be a constant reminder to all of us to hold our horses, to refrain our verdict until all the facts are out, to contemplate before jumping unto the bandwagon. There is so much about life. It is not all about being rich or poor, good or bad, black or white. There are myriad shades of gray in everything in every corner in between. I said it then, and I would like to say it once again: This is a forum where we can freely express our opinion unshackled by fear of reprisal or slander because of the relative anonymity we all enjoy. But this freedom that we have is not a roving commission to disparage people who expressed their dissent against the majority opinion, or whose view of life strikes at the heart of our own sense and sensibility.

Yup! I'm sure he'll get the same flak from tsikot members.

[FourFiveEight]

Driver na driver ang dating.

[iceblueyes]

I don't think this entire thread ever really cared if he was just a random driver or some rich politico or driver of some rich politico.. etc.
ok ka rin sir, you pick your fights and ignore the rest. classic

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I don't think this entire thread ever really cared if he was just a random driver or some rich politico or driver of some rich politico.. etc.
ok ka rin sir, you pick your fights and ignore the rest. classic

[_Cathy_]

I already had a feeling he was a driver. Whether he owns the car or he is a driver, I still think he is a douchebag. But he is a bigger douchebag for driving a car he does not own without "malasakit". Personally, I don't like driving other people's cars and when I do I take extra care than when driving my own car. I also don't think that all Chinese are rich. Money does not intimidate me, only artists intimidate me

[Walter]

Money does not intimidate me, only artists intimidate me

Also your hot, handsome German boss ...

[_Cathy_]

Also your hot, handsome German boss ...

Ha ha ha. Initially I found him very intimidating, but not anymore. Now I am just in awe

[Monseratto]

Jag driver is already passe. Newest social media star...

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v...type=2&theater

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Jag driver is already passe. Newest social media star...

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=962393160446705&set=vb.100000280898494 &type=2&theater

[coiter]

Jag driver is already passe. Newest social media star...

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v...type=2&theater

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Jag driver is already passe. Newest social media star...

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v...type=2&theater

wow. bagong thread dapat to.

[170kphlang]

ke driver siya o bigtime ceo ng ano mang kumpanya. ke pinaka-affordable na sasakyan o pinaka-mahal or anything in between. counterflow is counterflow. mali is mali. mahirap ba intindihin yun?

[BratPAQ]

ke driver siya o bigtime ceo ng ano mang kumpanya. ke pinaka-affordable na sasakyan o pinaka-mahal or anything in between. counterflow is counterflow. mali is mali. mahirap ba intindihin yun?

Apparently, basing on this thread, yes. Haha

[yebo]

Let us not mistake the trees for the forest. We all jump the gun here on an off tangent notion that— he drove a fancy car; he was Chinese; he was rich; he was powerful. But Joey Padiernos was not what we thought he really was. We bashed too soon. He was simply a man on the street who dreamed of, or had the illusion of, being somebody, not unlike Don Quixote De la Mancha. Had we known at the outset of who he was, would he get the same attention or flak he had been getting of late? Abuse or any of its kindred is not a character flaw peculiar only to the rich or powerful or to the Chinese or to those who drove and owned a fancy car— a man on the street could be that offensive too, or even much worse. Let Padiernos be a constant reminder to all of us to hold our horses, to refrain our verdict until all the facts are out, to contemplate before jumping unto the bandwagon. There is so much about life. It is not all about being rich or poor, good or bad, black or white. There are myriad shades of gray in everything in every corner in between. I said it then, and I would like to say it once again: This is a forum where we can freely express our opinion unshackled by fear of reprisal or slander because of the relative anonymity we all enjoy. But this freedom that we have is not a roving commission to disparage people who expressed their dissent against the majority opinion, or whose view of life strikes at the heart of our own sense and sensibility.

Wow! Mali na naman tayong lahat. Pak syet, the jag driver counterflowed, he broke the law, period! Bakit yung mga taong nagsasabi na mali siya ang naging mali ngayon? Buhay naman talaga oo, ANO BA ANG TAMA AT MALI? BAKIT PA MAY BATAS KUNG LAHAT NG TAO NA NAGSASABI NA DAPAT SUMUNOD SA BATAS E MALI? Porke "driver lang" si jag driver e forgiven na ba siya? Wala naman nagsabi na mali siya dahil chinese siya, or dahil rich, or dahil fancy ang car nya. Mali siya kasi mali yung ginawa nya. Mahirap ba intindihin yun? O ikaw lang ang di maka-gets na mali mag-counterflow?

[Juan Martinez]

Wow! Mali na naman tayong lahat. Pak syet, the jag driver counterflowed, he broke the law, period! Bakit yung mga taong nagsasabi na mali siya ang naging mali ngayon? Buhay naman talaga oo, ANO BA ANG TAMA AT MALI? BAKIT PA MAY BATAS KUNG LAHAT NG TAO NA NAGSASABI NA DAPAT SUMUNOD SA BATAS E MALI? Porke "driver lang" si jag driver e forgiven na ba siya? Wala naman nagsabi na mali siya dahil chinese siya, or dahil rich, or dahil fancy ang car nya. Mali siya kasi mali yung ginawa nya. Mahirap ba intindihin yun? O ikaw lang ang di maka-gets na mali mag-counterflow?

relax. that is not my point. I'm not saying you are wrong or anybody is. my point is this (and this is only my opinion): the knee-jerk reaction could not be that intense (considering that it happened few months back and came out only in the media recently) if he were only driving a dilapidated car, we had known beforehand that he was not the owner, and nobody came out from that white Innova as if that guy was his bodyguard. most of us was wrong in that respect. the media was just playing our emotion (to react violently). we were led on. why when it came out they did not say it happened in February. If it happened only in February most probably the media knew that that guy was only a driver (we call it investigative journalism). then why they were not forthright in the first place (by not telling us the real score). can't you see how powerful that establishment (the so-called fourth estate) change people's perception overnight. that's dangerous (they were able to insert a schism between the haves and the haves not by that 78 seconds video).

[Horsepower]

I think Jaguar PHL was forced to reveal ID and pass the pressure to Brightwhatever due to pressure from the giant client Globe.

Whether he's a chauffeur or the owner, it doesn't really matter. He violated a law and was dick enough to even cuss at the dashcam driver. He NEVER intended to follow the line, he was looking to beat it but the dashcam driver didn't give him way.

At the end of the day, nothing of this matters. Rich pricks will still violate laws - so we need more dashcams to shame them in public.

[mfabajon]

relax. that is not my point. I'm not saying you are wrong or anybody is. my point is this (and this is only my opinion): the knee-jerk reaction could not be that intense (considering that it happened few months back and came out only in the media recently) if he were only driving a dilapidated car, we had known beforehand that he was not the owner, and nobody came out from that white Innova as if that guy was his bodyguard. most of us was wrong in that respect. the media was just playing our emotion (to react violently). we were led on. why when it came out they did not say it happened in February. If it happened only in February most probably the media knew that that guy was only a driver (we call it investigative journalism). then why they were not forthright in the first place (by not telling us the real score). can't you see how powerful that establishment (the so-called fourth estate) change people's perception overnight. that's dangerous (they were able to insert a schism between the haves and the haves not by that 78 seconds video).

Sorry, didn't you assume that there was no malicious intent when the jaguar guy counterflowed? And does it matter if the guy is just a driver? Didn't he feel empowered when he drove that fancy car and used that power to gain an unfair advantage over other motorists? And how do you expect us to react to this incident? Fabricate elaborate excuses to justify this misconduct? Or just be lame and give way to every abusive driver on the road?

[Juan Martinez]

Sorry, didn't you assume that there was no malicious intent when the jaguar guy counterflowed? And does it matter if the guy is just a driver? Didn't he feel empowered when he drove that fancy car and used that power to gain an unfair advantage over other motorists? And how do you expect us to react to this incident? Fabricate elaborate excuses to justify this misconduct? Or just be lame and give way to every abusive driver on the road?

let's not mistake the trees for the forest. that's what separate men from the boys. you said something about "pride" the fact that we're interacting here is testament that I'm not using my pride. if you believe in something, you fight for what you believe in. there are always three sides of an argument-- your side, my side, and the right side. why? do you think all you read in the newspapers or saw on TV or read in the Internet are the unvarnished truth. now, if we cannot agree to disagree without being disagreeable we better not be talking. otherwise, everything will just be puerile.

[vvti2.0]

Abogado si sir, ang nasa mindset pagdating sa client, siempre wala malicious intent. Pero alam natin na may malicious intent yung driver, still kung ako ang dashcam owner, pagbibigyan ko. Mahirap ang sobrang tapang.

[mfabajon]

Abogado si sir, ang nasa mindset pagdating sa client, siempre wala malicious intent. Pero alam natin na may malicious intent yung driver, still kung ako ang dashcam owner, pagbibigyan ko. Mahirap ang sobrang tapang.

Bagamat nirerespeto ko opinyon ni Attorney, walang bearing sa karamihan dito ang natapos niya o narating niya sa buhay. Di na nga dapat nilabas iyon dahil parang in bad taste sa isang online forum.

Sa pagbibigay o pagiwas sa gulo dahil takot o naduduwag, wala ring masama doon. Pero yung ipipilit na mali iyong dashcam driver dahil naging matapang siya na ipaglaban ang karapatan niya, parang baluktot ata iyon.

[noitimed]

maiba lang. may mga tao talaga na hindi makatanggap ng mali. Plain and simple na illegal pagcounterflow at pagyayabang ang issue, napunta na sa "media" "last clear chance" at "pagrespeto sa mga kakaibang opinion"

[xagent_orangex]

noong una bilib ako sa taong yun e. kesyo nag-register daw siya dito para lang sa topic na yun.

binasa ko mga post niya, mga "naunang" post niya. maganda ang pananalita, ingles e, at ang nilalaman ng bawat mensahe niya noong "una" ay talaga namang may "substance".

pero, nang lumaon e parang nakaka-umay na, lumalim na ng lumalim, kung ano ano pang reference ang inilahad. at doon nga, sa puntong iyon e nawalan na ako ng "tiwala" sa mga posts nya.

puro ingles, malalalim, hindi mo maaarok lahat sa unang tingin, at kaagad iisipin mo na intelehente ang bawat sagot niya, pero kung babasahin mo ulit, oo tama nga ang pagkakasulat walang duda, ang mali ay ang kanyang konsepto.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

noong una bilib ako sa taong yun e. kesyo nag-register daw siya dito para lang sa topic na yun.

binasa ko mga post niya, mga "naunang" post niya. maganda ang pananalita, ingles e, at ang nilalaman ng bawat mensahe niya noong "una" ay talaga namang may "substance".

pero, nang lumaon e parang nakaka-umay na, lumalim na ng lumalim, kung ano ano pang reference ang inilahad. at doon nga, sa puntong iyon e nawalan na ako ng "tiwala" sa mga posts nya.

puro ingles, malalalim, hindi mo maaarok lahat sa unang tingin, at kaagad iisipin mo na intelehente ang bawat sagot niya, pero kung babasahin mo ulit, oo tama nga ang pagkakasulat walang duda, ang mali ay ang kanyang konsepto.

[shadow]

noong una bilib ako sa taong yun e. kesyo nag-register daw siya dito para lang sa topic na yun.

binasa ko mga post niya, mga "naunang" post niya. maganda ang pananalita, ingles e, at ang nilalaman ng bawat mensahe niya noong "una" ay talaga namang may "substance".

pero, nang lumaon e parang nakaka-umay na, lumalim na ng lumalim, kung ano ano pang reference ang inilahad. at doon nga, sa puntong iyon e nawalan na ako ng "tiwala" sa mga posts nya.

puro ingles, malalalim, hindi mo maaarok lahat sa unang tingin, at kaagad iisipin mo na intelehente ang bawat sagot niya, pero kung babasahin mo ulit, oo tama nga ang pagkakasulat walang duda, ang mali ay ang kanyang konsepto.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

noong una bilib ako sa taong yun e. kesyo nag-register daw siya dito para lang sa topic na yun.

binasa ko mga post niya, mga "naunang" post niya. maganda ang pananalita, ingles e, at ang nilalaman ng bawat mensahe niya noong "una" ay talaga namang may "substance".

pero, nang lumaon e parang nakaka-umay na, lumalim na ng lumalim, kung ano ano pang reference ang inilahad. at doon nga, sa puntong iyon e nawalan na ako ng "tiwala" sa mga posts nya.

puro ingles, malalalim, hindi mo maaarok lahat sa unang tingin, at kaagad iisipin mo na intelehente ang bawat sagot niya, pero kung babasahin mo ulit, oo tama nga ang pagkakasulat walang duda, ang mali ay ang kanyang konsepto.

Baka nahawa Sa mga tsikoters...kaya naging naging nonsense na rin mga post lately. [emoji1]