I've heard that a million times already. I don't think it's ever going to happen.
May ganyan ng panukala dati, 90s ata yun. Nananaginip na naman ang DENR.
Another stup1d sweeping plan. And who are they going to burden first? The taxpaying private citizens!
If they want to do something, they should go to the LTFRB and demand that the idiots there do their jobs. And by saying that, they should ensure that all the public vehicles that are registered actually pass emissions tests!
If James Deakin's article is to be believed, in his chat with some bus owners and operators, it's the LTFRB that cannot fully do their duties in scrutinizing all the public transportation that they allow to be registered. So they just ask for a bribe, and then blindly register them without conducting any checks on the roadworthiness of the vehicles. Seeing how these PUVs just fill the roads with smoke should be obvious for these DENR guys. Why not send their people to the LTFRB and assist?!
That's because they don't want any significant change to happen. They're just mouthing off again...
Cge nga DENR?sa idea nyong saksakan ng talino,eh inisip nyo ba kung sakali,eh san ilalagay ung mga sasakyan na gusto nyo i-BAN?Eh ung basura nga sa sariling mga kabahayan,d nyo na alam kung sang landfill nyo ilalagay eh.mga kotse pa.Teka,bka WOW MALI Nationwide version lng e2 ha.
Not my "Old Faithful",- please!
“The measure of a man is what he does with power – LJIOHF!”
24.5K:nite:
ereng bansang felifinaz ang banzang madaming bawal, daming batas na butas, daming epal. anu kaya kung ang gawing nilang batas e bawal na ang mga politiko, kritiko para mag karon naman siguro ng kakaibang pag babago..malamang sa malamang e sa panaginip lamang yan mangyari. kaya yaang mga mahal ninyong mga politiko iboto ninyo ulet sila para di sila mawala sa pwesto. panu tatanggalin mga lumang sasakyan e parami pa nga ng parami mga imported at mga sasakyan na mga pinag lumaan na tanging yun lamang ang kayang bilhin ng ating mga kababayan sa abot ng kanilang kakayahan..
Malabo yan mgeelection e mdmi mggalit kaya nga di matuloy2 un sa pgtaas ng pamasahe sa mrt dhil cla bbalikan
simple lang yan.. gawin nang LTO ang trabaho nila.. pag nagpa rehistro.. i check nila mabuti kung road worthy pa ang sasakyan.. pag hindi na kahit wala pang 15 years.. wag na nila i rehistro!
Sakin ok lang, basta kailangan judge yung vehicles by its engine age and not registered date.
Dami makakalusot na jeep.
Mas ok pa nga 10 years lang... Banned na.
Pero in all reality, that would never pass.
1. i think (only?) japan has a rule against older cars on the road. but they can afford it..
2. they got the idea right, when they went after polluting vehicles. but they painted themselves into a corner when they declared a necessary smoke emissions test. tuloy kasi, kahit obvious na na itim, hindi pa rin magawan ng kaso dahil walang emissions print-out.
Last edited by dr. d; October 1st, 2014 at 05:05 PM.
what is behind the construction of the law?
they should have created a law banning un - maintained or improperly maintained vehicles on the road(slex and nlex enforcing this since it's a privately owned road?)
public utility vehicles managed by the ltrtfb already imposed such rule(puv s' only 5 years for taxi? 7 years for bus and jeeps?- problem is cheating(they kept refurbishing the body but not the engine) and enforcement)
improperly maintained- how? - via booklet or service manual(your pms ladies and gents to be done by an autoshop with proper registration in any lgu(so kung may business permit suki niyong mechanic yan pwede)- incase of engine, brakes and internal stuff- showing that the car is properly maintained at intevals of 10,000km for private and 3,000 km for public) can be enforced by the lto prior and every registration renewal
;or by plain view such as deteriorated tires, not working signal lights, headlights.
if we want to be viewed as a civilized society that's the price
but banning a well maintained vehicle on the basis of it's age is just plain absurd and unjust restriction to/of property rights