New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 88
  1. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,251
    #11
    the question here is not determining fault but more with the purported law that requires you to provide a service vehicle to the other party. Meron ba? So far, one has to settle for the property damage to the other party's vehicle, but have yet to hear of any that includes a service vehicle.

    That's why the subdivision offered to shoulder the deductible participation share, as this will be charged to the guard. Kawawa kasi yung guard kung sasagutin niya yung buong repair, which was estimated by Hyundai casa at almost 50K. If merong law on the service vehicle, ok, sagot na rin yun ng gwardya/security agency. I want to know if there is such a law, para I can also inform our company about it, or if ever may magbangga sa personal car ko, claim rin ako ng service vehicle.

  2. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    913
    #12
    motor bike and starex? hhmhmhmh really that much of a damage?

  3. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,940
    #13
    Kung sa ating mga typical na pinoy parang nakakaasar yung kano kasi masyado maarte kasi madami hinihingi....Actually yung crooswind ko kakapasok sa casa kanina lang, nabangga ng trike driver 2 weeks ago(siempre inayos pa yung claim), 1 week gagawin..Kung iisipin sobrang abala yung 1 week na maiiba yung sked mo. To think pa na hindi ikaw yung may kasalanan. Tapos yung nakabangga kamot ulo lang..

  4. Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,837
    #14
    bad trip nga yan mga nang-aabala na yan

  5. Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    375
    #15
    Obviously, we're as clueless as you. I doubt you can use any advise posted so far to help your cause. Faced with a possible lawsuit, it's best to consult a lawyer (someone who specializes in Consumer Law) who'll give better advise.

  6. Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    51
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by KoKoNAT View Post
    Obviously, we're as clueless as you. I doubt you can use any advise posted so far to help your cause. Faced with a possible lawsuit, it's best to consult a lawyer (someone who specializes in Consumer Law) who'll give better advise.
    Maybe you are referring to a lawyer with experience handling cases of tort, or those actions involving quasi-delicts (crime resulting from imprudence/negligence) or from quasi-contracts (claim for damages arising from obligations to pay without a contract), but not a lawyer specializing in laws against violations of consumer concerns like misrepresentation or deceit in selling consumer products. Just maybe.
    I don't understand it but the problem there is for the insurance of both vehicles to handle or resolve as all vehicles are required to acquire insurance protection in cases like this. At least I could presume both vehicles are equipped with TPL insurance so that damages maybe answered by their own insurance policies. There is no need for each party to shell out anything to answer for the repair or damage of each other's vehicle. All one has to do is bring the damaged vehicle to the accredited shop and the insurer of the damaged vehicles takes care of its repairs and charges or files a claim against the insurer of the other vehicle who was the insurer of the party at fault. If it is provided in the insurance policy, the shop may provide an alternate vehicle. If there is none, there is nothing to give or can be expected.
    Driving without a license is a separate offense under the Motor Vehicle Law and can be prosecuted through sactions under such law. But I am sure everyone is interested in getting back in shape, aren't they? What do you think?

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,038
    #17
    IMO, just give his demand, fair naman yun demand niya dahil naka wheelchair siya, and beside kasalang naman ng guard eh, kahit hinde niya kasalan since wala siyang license, fault pa rin niya...

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    21,244
    #18
    TPL only covers bodily injuries or death and not property damage.

    may tanong ako: kelangan din ba ng driver's license if you are driving inside a private property like inside a subdivision or inside an industrial compound?

    and i also would like to know kung meron nga talagang law dito sa pinas to provide for a service unit for the aggrieved party.

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    22,658
    #19
    may tanong ako: kelangan din ba ng driver's license if you are driving inside a private property like inside a subdivision or inside an industrial compound?
    Ang alam ko din you don't need a license to drive in private roads depende sa may ari ng road na iyon. Wala ding coding. Yung scooter namin wala nang rehistro kasi sa private road lang tumatakbo. Police clearance lang ang meron.

    Regarding sa service vehicle, mas ok na sigurong yung association na lang ang kumuha. Kasi baka kapag si Mr. Kano ang kumuha, eh yung S-Class pa ng Manila Pen ang upahan at i-charge sa inyo. Madami namang jeepney for rent sa paligid. Or at least something cheap with a/c.

    http://docotep.multiply.com/
    Need an Ambulance? We sell Zic Brand Oils and Lubricants. Please PM me.

  10. Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    51
    #20
    Quote Originally Posted by OTEP View Post
    Ang alam ko din you don't need a license to drive in private roads depende sa may ari ng road na iyon. Wala ding coding. Yung scooter namin wala nang rehistro kasi sa private road lang tumatakbo. Police clearance lang ang meron.
    Regarding sa service vehicle, mas ok na sigurong yung association na lang ang kumuha. Kasi baka kapag si Mr. Kano ang kumuha, eh yung S-Class pa ng Manila Pen ang upahan at i-charge sa inyo. Madami namang jeepney for rent sa paligid. Or at least something cheap with a/c.
    Brod Boybits, Otep, I think, "operating a motorized vehicle in a public highway" does not only admit of running a motorized vehicle within a national, provincial, municipal, or barrio road. Even roads within a private subidvision is construed as a "public highway", within the meaning of our laws, for as long as it is used by the general public, even if used only by a small segment of the general public. Perhaps, the only difference is that there are no police enforcers inside a private subdivision to apprehend violators. Or if accident happens, it is usually attended by security guards of the subdivision who renders report and submits the same to the police who may file the necessary initiatory papers in court.
    I have not encountered any law here in R.P. requiring insurance companies to provide service vehicle to the insured in case his vehicle becomes involved in an accident, though parties are not so prohibited from agreeing to include such a rider, for additional premium, in the policy. In practice though it may be considered as a luxury considering that no insurer has a ready fleet to provide many of its insured clients, more so if clients are choosy on the type, model, etc., of the vehicles. Besides our laws are not meant to enrich or provide convenience but only to give "reasonable" compensation since accident without fault do happen. The term "reasonable" is not for us to decide but is usually after long and tedious deliberations in court. Just my opinion. Sensya na humaba yata!

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
service vehicle demand by other party due to accident