calling TS![]()
baka nagka-typo error yung TS. dapat 18-20 secs. that would be a reason for concern.
...or baka naman nagtrasplant na ng makina galing sa explorer trac.
kung yung gen1 ranger trekker m/t with the old 2.5wlt engine kaya nga ang 10 seconds. nasubukan ko na yan kasi i had one before. i think 9. something yung sa timer ko hehehe, on to a top speed of 180kmh. pero sa gen1 everest with the heavier body and a/t pa (had this one also), swerte na akong maka 14 sec 0-100kph hehehe. biglang nawala yung TS hindi na nakapag reply![]()
Well... it's all conjecture... hand-timed really isn't that accurate... especially on pickups, where the different wheel sizes on different variants mean the speedo is often suggestive, not descriptive.
I'd like to put the 2.5 to the V-Box to double-check.
Fastest 2.5 we've V-Boxed is the Navarra. 11.5 seconds or so, I believe... but that's because the stupid ECU cuts power every time we try to do a drop-clutch launch. Should've been 10 seconds or so.
The old Ranger WLT can't do 10 seconds. I'm betting around 13, maybe... just not enough power.
Ano... drag-race party tayo? Hehehe... Paseo de Santa Rosa... Beers on me...![]()
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
what's with the whole 8-10 seconds to reach 100 kph anyway? on a diesel pickup/auv?
a diesel pickup/auv ain't never gonna be racecar, boss ts... reminds me of a thread here once when some moron claimed to race/run his diesel adventure to near 170 kph... fantastic... i bet that thing got 30 kms to a liter too.
use the right tool for the job, i say. if you want a fast getaway vehicle when robbing backs, or you want to run the quarter mile at under 13 seconds, get a subcompact with a big engine.
ok rant over... magkakape nako hehe
Naman... mahal kumain sa Cabalen, eh... :grin :
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
Even the newer Ford Ranger & Mazda BT-50 2.5L wouldn't do a 0-100kph run in 10 seconds or less... yes it can reach 180kph but it ain't going to be racing those Civic 2.0s yet.
__________________
bigbigcar.com Review: Toyota Previa 2.4 Q AT
Last edited by mazdamazda; March 5th, 2009 at 03:23 PM. Reason: grammar