New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 170 of 202 FirstFirst ... 70120160166167168169170171172173174180 ... LastLast
Results 3,381 to 3,400 of 7178

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,513
    #1
    Quote Originally Posted by JX290 View Post
    30K sir.

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App
    sir IMO sa 30k mag OVERLAND atlas Rollbar ka nalang tapos buy ka OEM Roof Rail, and soft bed cover.... functional pa..

    pwede mo patungan ng kahit anong bagay yung rollbar mo..

  2. Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    336
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by glenn manikis View Post
    sir IMO sa 30k mag OVERLAND atlas Rollbar ka nalang tapos buy ka OEM Roof Rail, and soft bed cover.... functional pa..

    pwede mo patungan ng kahit anong bagay yung rollbar mo..
    Sir ok yung advise nyo. But ito ang gusto ko. Last option ko na lang yung advise nyo if wala talaga. But thinking also that the overland bar is higher than the roof of the ranger kaya pangit tingnan.

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  3. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by JX290 View Post
    Sir ok yung advise nyo. But ito ang gusto ko. Last option ko na lang yung advise nyo if wala talaga. But thinking also that the overland bar is higher than the roof of the ranger kaya pangit tingnan.

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App
    Yeah di ko rin trip na lagpas siya sa bubong ng Ranger. Mas okay yung sa Hilux, saktong sakto.

    Black Hilux with Overland rollbars and 20" OEM-style Toyota rims = my idea of pogi.

    Still hoping for 20" OEM-looking rims for the Ranger. Hanggang wala, will probably stick with 18s..


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  4. Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,513
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post
    Yeah di ko rin trip na lagpas siya sa bubong ng Ranger. Mas okay yung sa Hilux, saktong sakto.

    Black Hilux with Overland rollbars and 20" OEM-style Toyota rims = my idea of pogi.

    Still hoping for 20" OEM-looking rims for the Ranger. Hanggang wala, will probably stick with 18s..


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App
    Look for mags na pang 2014 na explorer.. baka same ang Pcd... ayan ang una kung naisip

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  5. Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,513
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by JX290 View Post
    Sir ok yung advise nyo. But ito ang gusto ko. Last option ko na lang yung advise nyo if wala talaga. But thinking also that the overland bar is higher than the roof of the ranger kaya pangit tingnan.

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App
    Hindi naman po dapat talaga lampas... pag pang ranger dapat level lang ng kunti sa roof..

    Re. Sports bar... try nyo atoys..

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  6. Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    336
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by glenn manikis View Post
    Hindi naman po dapat talaga lampas... pag pang ranger dapat level lang ng kunti sa roof..

    Re. Sports bar... try nyo atoys..

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App
    Sana meron yung old school na type. Actually gusto ko yun. Yung ginagamit sa mga lumang pick up noon. Protection lang.

    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  7. Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    4
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    uh oh! na-detect ng bcm yang hid mo so ni-off nya ang head lights. gumamit ka ba ng relay? dapat yung oem headlight bulb socket naka-salpak sa relay, at yung relay ang mag-power ng hid. pag rekta lang e yan ang result. pa-reset mo sa casa. pag mabait yung service manager ok lang, pag hindi e bye bye electrical warranty!


    btw, may projectors ba na housing yang hid mo? if wala then, well, good na hindi gumana. baka kasi madami lang magalit sa iyo sa sabog na head lights mo, kaka-glare kasi yan pag hindi naka-projectors.
    Nangyari na po 'to sa inyo or sa other Ford members? May na research naman ako na yung stall switch ang problema. Yung wire connecting dun na tusta. Sana nga ECU reset lang..

    Wala po projectors. Just 4300k hid bulbs lang. May cutoff pa din sya sir.

    Thanks for the help.

  8. Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    #8
    Baka mali ung negative at positive mo? Polarity.Or better ipakabit niyo na lang sa marunong mag install ng hid.


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  9. Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    162
    #9
    Wiring lang yan sir


    Tsikot Mobile App

  10. Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    20
    #10
    I forgot to turn-off the engine while filling-up.. the fuel gauge did not update and was still able to run 'til now.. Ahahay!

    imageuploadedbytsikot-forums1407226865.581785.jpg


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  11. Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    29
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by JX290 View Post
    Mga ka forumers, baka gusto nyong palitan ang wildtrak cargo liner nyo at sports bar, I am willing to buy it. You may PM me or post here. Only if you are willing. Thanks. More power to us all! hehehe.
    Meron ako. Call me 8816256

  12. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #12
    I have similar FC to JX290 and Glenn. 8-10 km/L in city driving and around 12-14 km/L in highway driving. You can probably reach 20 km/L if you stick to 70-80 kph, but I've never been able to do that on the highway.

    Compared to the 2.5 engine of the Everest/old Ranger, the 2.2 actually has noticeably more power. If you floor it and you're within 1500-3500 rpm, it'll keep pace even with the more powerful Fortuner 3.0 or Montero VGT.

    However, the 2.5 of the Everest has noticeably less turbo lag, since it's less peaky. Driving at 1000-1500 rpm isn't as powerless as in the Ranger so you don't have to row through the gears as much. The manual Everest is also easier to drive than the manual Ranger 2.2, since the clutch of the T6 Ranger makes you feel like you're taming a bull, while the Everest doesn't have any jerkiness.

    If you get an automatic though, the turbo lag and jerkiness are much less noticeable.


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

  13. Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9
    #13
    thanks for the replies,
    went to fort global city and inquired on the ranger, I found out the the xl model's engine is similar to the everest's engine but only 2.2 liters. the xlt's engine is the newer one, the ford person told me that the new engine(xlt's engine) is equivalent to the 3.0 liter old engine. I also found out that if you are looking for a 4x4 unit you only have 2 choices the xl and the 3.2 wildtrak. Sayang the discontinued the 2.2 wildtrak 4x4 and sayang because they also don't offer the xlt in 4x4.

  14. Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,090
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post
    The manual Everest is also easier to drive than the manual Ranger 2.2, since the clutch of the T6 Ranger makes you feel like you're taming a bull, while the Everest doesn't have any jerkiness.
    How is the Ranger's clutch ? Based on your comment, I assume its heavy (like the Patrol's) ? Or is it bec. the clutch has a very high "bite" point ?

  15. Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    7
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by number001 View Post
    How is the Ranger's clutch ? Based on your comment, I assume its heavy (like the Patrol's) ? Or is it bec. the clutch has a very high "bite" point ?
    Allow me to chime in. I havent driven a patrol so i cant compare, but yes, the clutch is very high in my 3.2 WT. I used to ride both the clutch and accelerator on my honda city since it didnt do anything, now i had to relearn everything.

    One thing ive read and seem to agree is that the manual has some sort of rev compensation. If you have the habit of adding a bit of revs when you downshift to ease "gearshift shock", the ranger tends to "buck". If you just release the clutch fully and only then accelerate, its better. I still cant say its smooth tho, but have eliminated some jerkiness.

    Also, since the clutch is very high, i position my seat further away so that i can only step half of the length of my clutch. Bottoming it out also makes it jerky.

    Hope this helps.

  16. Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    7
    #16
    Delete this double post pls

  17. Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,090
    #17
    Is there still a waiting list for XLT ?

  18. Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    191
    #18
    Looking to trade in my "other brand" pickup for a Ford Ranger XL model - anybody with any recommended contacts? Preferably Ford By the bay but any dealership that's not too far north it fine.

    Thanks

  19. Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    10,314
    #19
    ^^^ You're better off Googling for the information than hearing it from misinformed sales agents.

  20. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #20
    The 2.5 (WLC) and 3.0 (WEC) engines of the Everest and old Ranger are Mazda engines.

    The 2.2 is a Puma (ZSD-422) engine developed by Ford. The 3.2 is also a Ford engine but differs from the other Puma engines because it is a 5-cylinder.

    So, no, the 3.0 of the Everest is not related to the 2.2 of the new Ranger. Perhaps what the sales agent was saying was that both engines produce similar power. This is probably true for peak power, but the 3.0 has more torque and less turbo lag than the 2.2.


    Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

2012 Ford Ranger