Should gay marriages be allowed in our country?

[wren]

there are lot of reasons why i agree for same *** marriage , for legal purposes kailangan nila ito like yung mga nainterview sa TV, they've been together yata for more than 20 years at nagkakaedad na sila, kapag namatay yung isa, sino ang pwede magclaim ng labi ng namatay? ciempre legally yung direct relative ng namatay at hindi ang kinakasama nya, sa aspeto din ng mga properties na naipundar nilang dalawa, at higit sa lahat ay maranasan nilang makamtan yung rights na nakukuha ng mga normal na mag-asawa.

IMHO , it will really not affect us, pero it will greatly affect them. Lets give it to them, matagal na nilang hinihiling yun eh, kung si erap napagbibigyan ng gobyerno, kung si GMA napapatawad ng tao na kung saan ang mga taong ito ay direktang naapektuhan ang bayan, ito pa kayang same *** marriage na kung saan di naman tayo masyado maapektuhan?

hindi ikakahirap or ikakaunlad ng bansa ang same *** marriage kaya pagbigyan na lang sana sila.

. yung rights lang naman nila ang habol eh. i don't think they're dying to get married at the church. they just want a legal binding para ma-include yung partner nila sa medical/dental insurance, mabisita sa emergency room, ma-include sa will, maka-adopt ng child, etc. these are basic rights they dont have. how do you like it if these are taken away from you?

[jim]

NO!!!! Kasi po ang goal ng family is to multiply. pag pareho BADING magpapakasal di naman sila magkakaanak. Kung aampon naman sila kaninong LAST NAME ang gagamitin nung BATA???!!!????

[Wouie]

yes. marami po sa mga may kayang gay couples ay nag-aadopt ng child at nakapagbibigay ng magandang kinabukasan don sa bata.

[fakesaint]

[BlueBimmer]

ayan nanaman..

[tinky]

^ ano yan meron ba silang nakaraan na di ko nasubaybayan?

[city]

^ ano yan meron ba silang nakaraan na di ko nasubaybayan?

missZ..coder and I had a brief encounter about a certain topic...we've been close since then.....

[FrankDrebin]

For me, a Catholic, Muslim, Hindu, etc. wedding is a big NO!

But as a legal marriage by law then why not?

[BlueBimmer]

^hmm agree with FD

[empy]

i don't have a problem with it. live and let live.

i have no right to deny two people the chance to be happy (and to be protected under the law) just because i am a little uncomfortable around them. it doesn't hurt me anyway.

but i am 100% sure the Philippines is not ready for this.

[GasJunkie]

i don't have a problem with it. live and let live.

i have no right to deny two people the chance to be happy (and to be protected under the law) just because i am a little uncomfortable around them. it doesn't hurt me anyway.

but i am 100% sure the Philippines is not ready for this.

Quoted for the mother f_____g truth.


ot been a long time how are you?

[empy]

i think the responses on this thread alone support my earlier comment that the philippines isn't ready for this. not because its citizens are wrong or ignorant (i think the comments posted by my fellow tsikoteers are far from that), but because you guys have such a strong set of ethical/moral values that go against it.

some of you made a very good point about the distinction between a religious marriage and a legal one. gay people can enjoy the rights and privileges of marriage through a legal union without igniting the firestorm of getting religious approval (which imo is impossible anyway).

ot been a long time how are you?

OT - been good, bro. hope all's well with you also.

[PJC]

God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve... ehehehe!
Never mess with the divine Master plan.
It is written... For man, not to lie with man as one lies with a woman. It is detestable.

[falken]

If it's legalized then yes. It's their lives and as long as it doesn't hurt anybody, let them live it.

[city]

people who get into marriage have committed themselves to each other in sickness and in heatlh for richer or for poorer. ba bla, bla--...to the point na kahit walang anak. Dyan natin makikita na marriage is not only about having children..it's about real relationship. It's about finding your partner....it's about commitment....magka-anak man o hindi. I know a lot of marriages who are successful even without siblings. Why would we treat gay marriages any different? Marami dyan may mga anak pero pasakit naman sa gobyerno.

On another note, are we saying homo***ual acts are hideous, unimaginable, sinful, kadiri? aba e maraming lalaki dyan na mas hayop at kadiri pa sa mga bakla.

*** is just secondary...it's a private thing. and as one tsikotter quoted..it doesn't affect anyone of us...as long as it's private. What's important is that these people are humans too. They are capable of love, which is the most important thing.

Government should allow it. It's one of the basic right to privacy and fundamental to all human beings.

Same *** marriage is a big NO to most religions...(but other than this you can marry your cousin, you can marry a 9 year olds, etc.)

Marriage should not be limited to church affiliations or beliefs or religion.



coder..i have yet to see your side....hehehe

[CoDer]

coder..i have yet to see your side....hehehe

Ayoko nga... Hehehehe...

Legalistic point of view vs. Spiritual naman yan.

Gulo yan sigurado.

[ghosthunter]

before same *** marriages issue can be tackled, I think the divorse issue has to be tackled first.

[city]

before same *** marriages issue can be tackled, I think the divorse issue has to be tackled first.

yup..religions escpecially christianism do not allow divorce..pero bakit allowed?..double standard?

[CoDer]

yup..religions escpecially christianism do not allow divorce..pero bakit allowed?..double standard?

Allowed and divorce city. Gawa-gawa lang ng simbahan yan, Pati na ang hindi pag aasawa ng Pari eh gawa-gawa lang din nila.

Here's verse from the Bible:

Mattew 5:31-32

31 “It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife must give her a written notice of divorce. 32 But I say to you, any man who divorces his wife, except for ***ual immorality, causes her to commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.”

Si Jesus Christ mismo ang nagsabi nyan.

[city]

Allowed and divorce city. Gawa-gawa lang ng simbahan yan, Pati na ang hindi pag aasawa ng Pari eh gawa-gawa lang din nila.

Here's verse from the Bible:

Mattew 5:31-32

31 “It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife must give her a written notice of divorce. 32 But I say to you, any man who divorces his wife, except for ***ual immorality, causes her to commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.”

Si Jesus Christ mismo ang nagsabi nyan.

palagay ko ginawa ng simbahan yun base rin sa salita ng dyos...i just don't remember the verse and chapter and it says something like when god unites two people let no man put asunder..something like that. And the church bases it's acts on what the book says..."whatever you bind on earth shall also be bounded in heaven"....so I guess the church's acts are bible based..based from what is claimed to be the word of god....and since we are a catholic nation we follow the church and do not allow divorce. But, our government is doing otherwise because we believe in the separation of the church and state. Kaya nasbi kong double standard.