New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,105
    #1
    So I was looking for online prices in the US of K&N stuff, then I saw this:

    http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/index....d=66&Itemid=76

    The test results show that paper filter is the best when it comes to the task of limiting particulates to the engine. K&N however let a LOT of particulates in.

    To K&N users, have you ever had a problem? What do you guys think of this test (and its revelations)?

    What is the effect of particulates getting inside the engine? Will it pose a serious problem or is it something that can be fixed in a snap?

    Many thanks in advance.

  2. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #2
    air filters that are supposed to let more air in compared to stock (like K&N) use filter material with bigger holes

    nothing to worry about

    it takes more than particulates to harm an engine

    before (the Libis days) i would drive around with no air filter

    one headlight removed, air goes directly into the air intake tube

    the faster i drive, the more air gets rammed into the intake, the more power i get (fun )

    did that for quite a while

    no damage to the engine

    put the filter and headlight back when i sold the car

    hehe

  3. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,036
    #3
    wet type filters(oiled like k&n) are harmful not with the engine but with the maf sensor. some people have these problems some dont. pero personally ok yan!

  4. Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,540
    #4
    Hopefully I won't have a problem with mine. Just had one installed w/ my brothers 1.3 verita. K&N filter with their own(speedlab)tube.

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,985
    #5
    I have stopped using K&N filters and prefer a dry element filter like Volant and others that don't require oiling.

  6. Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,078
    #6
    I use AEM dryflow synthetic air filter . No need to oil and it has a 99.4 % filtering ability.

  7. Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    994
    #7
    I just uninstalled my SX8 City's K&N cold air intake set. More than a year kong ginamit ito. Ibinalik ko yung orig na config using an OEM filter. Why?

    1. hirap mag-10km/ltr sa city driving (it used to be 10-12km/ltr before I installed the K&N CAI). Unacceptable because the engine is only 1300 EFI;
    2. during rainy days, kung minsan ay taas-baba ang RPM ko sa cold starts. Some say it is common amongst CAI users pag basa o malamig ang panahon;
    3. at medyo naging "offensive" ang amoy ng exhaust/emission nito.

    *Kung maintenance ang paguusapan, istrikto ako pagdating dito. I never missed the scheduled maintenance checkup/services for my cars.

    ** I tried to drive it "by the book" pero talagang below 10km/ltr sa city driving. OK naman sa hiway kasi kaya nitong mag 14-15km/ltr.

    I'll keep you posted on whatever results I can get . . .
    Last edited by jjmd3_787; September 24th, 2009 at 04:37 PM. Reason: tao lang po ...

  8. Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3
    #8
    there was this test about aftermarket air filters..k&n didnt have good results,same with hks which is also famous..but APexi got the best results in filtering and performance...

  9. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,704
    #9
    Aftermarket filters will never filter as well as the stock paper filter. Not a huge deal... just watch your oil and clean your filter regularly. Some guys even run carbs with open stacks on their cars.

    If a filter and CAI affect your fuel economy, then the MAF adapter is sized wrong. That's why I always use the stock MAF housing, no matter what other mods I do to the intake.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  10. Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    994
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by jjmd3_787 View Post
    I just uninstalled my SX8 City's K&N cold air intake set. More than a year kong ginamit ito. Ibinalik ko yung orig na config using an OEM filter. Why?

    1. hirap mag-10km/ltr sa city driving (it used to be 10-12km/ltr before I installed the K&N CAI). Unacceptable because the engine is only 1300 EFI;
    2. during rainy days, kung minsan ay taas-baba ang RPM ko sa cold starts. Some say it is common amongst CAI users pag basa o malamig ang panahon;
    3. at medyo naging "offensive" ang amoy ng exhaust/emission nito.

    *Kung maintenance ang paguusapan, istrikto ako pagdating dito. I never missed the scheduled maintenance checkup/services for my cars.

    ** I tried to drive it "by the book" pero talagang below 10km/ltr sa city driving. OK naman sa hiway kasi kaya nitong mag 14-15km/ltr.

    I'll keep you posted on whatever results I can get . . .

    After a 6-day period observation, I was able to obtain the following results:
    1. my FC is back to 10.5km/ltr city driving;
    2. the RPM is always stable even in cold starts during this past rainy days;
    3. emission odor is less offensive.

    I guess I'll have to stick with OEM filters from now on. Sayang lang yung 5K+ na K&N CAI ko. Same goes to my other car na naka-Simota (carousel-type na pang-carb) naman. Nakakadismaya.
    Last edited by jjmd3_787; September 30th, 2009 at 10:02 AM. Reason: tao lang po ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Performance Air Filters like K&N, harmful?