New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    194
    #1
    just read this a while ago...

    http://business.inquirer.net/money/b...-gasoline--DoE


    Not enough supply to enforce 10% ethanol blending for gasoline--DoE
    By Amy R. Remo
    Philippine Daily Inquirer
    First Posted 19:08:00 01/24/2011

    Filed Under: business, Oil & Gas - Downstream activities
    MANILA, Philippines -- The Department of Energy has been mulling pushing through with the mandated 10-percent ethanol blending for gasoline, as local ethanol supply remains short of the requirements of oil companies.
    Energy Undersecretary Jose Layug, Jr. clarified that the plan to raise the blending of ethanol to 10 percent from the current 5 percent was not even mandatory.
    “It's not mandatory—in fact that's the job of the National Biofuels Board. We will make a determination whether or not we will recommend to the DOE the mandate to (raise the blending to) E10. We are not there yet and we're still conducting public consultation,” Layug explained.
    The Biofuels Law states that “within four years from the effectivity of this Act, the NBB created under this Act is empowered to determine the feasibility and thereafter recommend to DOE to mandate a minimum of 10 percent blend of bioethanol by volume into all gasoline fuel distributed and sold by each and every oil company in the country.”
    According to Layug, a number of issues should be threshed out during these consultations since there is still no adequate local ethanol supply.
    “We also need to emphasize that although we advocate for cleaner fuel, we have to ensure that it would not push pump prices to increase as well. We cannot afford pushing for this [increase ethanol blend to 10 percent] and then it will increase local oil prices,” he explained.
    “But at the same time, the local oil companies must ensure that they purchase first from local ethanol producers. They are given priority, and the DOE will issue a circular to that effect. The law mandates oil companies that local ethanol production must be prioritized,” Layug said.
    “What we propose to do is provide penalties if they do not comply. Some of them will import, but we have to make sure that they have purchased from local ethanol producers before they import. And so far, all of local production is being tapped,” he further disclosed.
    Once the government mandates a 10-percent blend starting this year, ethanol demand is expected to increase to 461 million liters from last year’s estimated demand of 219 million liters, DOE data show.
    However, local ethanol producers can only supply a fraction of this demand or an estimated 83 million liters this year.
    The supply is expected to come from San Carlos BioEnergy Inc., which produces 40 million liters a year; Leyte Agri Corp. with 10 million liters annually; and Roxol Bioenergy of Roxas Holdings Inc., which is expected to go on stream this year, with an annual production of 33 million liters.




    -so, ano na mangyayari ngayon? mas tataas pa ang e10? ang galing talaga magpatupad ng batas, basta makapasa lang ng batas...kahit walang research.
    Last edited by ghosthunter; January 24th, 2011 at 10:02 PM.

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29,354
    #2
    Anyone with a little research and a little forward projection can see that we do no have the capacity to economically produce enough ethanol for fuel use. Heck! We don't even have enough rice production for feed all Filipinos, why waste time, money and land to grow crops for fuel?

    We used to export rice to other countries in the past. Now we have to import rice from neighboring countries just to feed ourselves. How can we progress as a country when we cannot even be self-reliant in food production?

    Crops for fuel or crops for food. That is the choice we have to make for now.

  3. Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,610
    #3
    imported ethanol...

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    178
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by ghosthunter View Post
    We used to export rice to other countries in the past. Now we have to import rice from neighboring countries just to feed ourselves. How can we progress as a country when we cannot even be self-reliant in food production?

    Crops for fuel or crops for food. That is the choice we have to make for now.

    That's because the land used to produce rice has been mostly converted to subdivisions. Don't be fooled by the numbers and think that its because of the incompetence of our farmers: it is definitely not their fault. Our farmers still are the most efficient in terms of production. On a per hectare basis, they produce at least 33 percent more annually compared to other countries. They just have a lot less land to work with.

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by mreyes View Post
    just read this a while ago...

    http://business.inquirer.net/money/b...-gasoline--DoE








    -so, ano na mangyayari ngayon? mas tataas pa ang e10? ang galing talaga magpatupad ng batas, basta makapasa lang ng batas...kahit walang research.
    galing ng gobyerno natin no?

    kaya bumibili ng ethanol ang mga local oil companies sa Brazil

    like yung CNG buses

    nauna ang mga CNG buses before the natural gas infrastructure

  6. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by grail80 View Post
    That's because the land used to produce rice has been mostly converted to subdivisions. Don't be fooled by the numbers and think that its because of the incompetence of our farmers: it is definitely not their fault. Our farmers still are the most efficient in terms of production. On a per hectare basis, they produce at least 33 percent more annually compared to other countries. They just have a lot less land to work with.
    bottom line is -- our country, instead of being a major rice producer, is the world's biggest rice importer

    ironic no? dito pa naman naka-base ang IRRI

  7. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    39,162
    #7

    Then, repeal or hold the implementation of this law.

    12K:boom:

  8. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #8
    they probably won't

    some politicians could have business interests in local ethanol producers

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29,354
    #9
    Quote Originally Posted by grail80 View Post
    That's because the land used to produce rice has been mostly converted to subdivisions. Don't be fooled by the numbers and think that its because of the incompetence of our farmers: it is definitely not their fault. Our farmers still are the most efficient in terms of production. On a per hectare basis, they produce at least 33 percent more annually compared to other countries. They just have a lot less land to work with.
    Yet, we still have to import rice. And the government is pushing for more land to grow fuel-crops. Shouldn't the government push for more food crops including rice as their priority over fuel-crops? Or is there a few people in government directly profiting (again) from this setup of pushing for more ethanol fuel crops?

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29,354
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by uls View Post
    they probably won't

    some politicians could have business interests in local ethanol producers
    exactly. Follow the money.

not enough supply of ethanol