[SIZE=4]Insurers nix proposal to make ‘acts of God’ coverage mandatory[/SIZE]
10/19/2009 | 03:35 PM
Non-life insurers are against a proposal to make coverage against natural disasters mandatory, saying this would be detrimental to the industry.
"We can’t make acts of God coverage compulsory. It’s a basic exclusion because nobody can withstand the losses from that," said Michael F. Rellosa, vice-chairman of non-life industry group Philippine Insurers and Reinsurers Association (PIRA).
"It will destroy the industry," he added.
Senate Majority Leader Aquilino Q. Pimentel, Jr. has called for changes to the Insurance Code, particularly that of making coverage for natural disasters mandatory for those selling motor vehicle policies.
The comprehensive third party liability insurance required for all motor vehicle owners currently only covers costs arising from road accidents or theft.
Natural disasters such as flood and lightning can be included as a "rider" if car owners pay an extra 0.3-0.5 percent of the premium.
Mr. Rellosa claimed the industry might collapse if it was made to pay all at once in the event of a calamity such as a volcanic eruption or the floods brought by Ondoy last month.
Reinsurers will not favor a surfeit of policies with coverage for natural disasters, he added.
Industry veteran Reynaldo A. de Dios shared the view, saying: "It (coverage against natural disasters) should be optional as [the] premium rate is a bit costly."
"I doubt companies would agree should they be forced to underwrite risks unless there is a good reinsurance support and a fair rate."
Mr. Rellosa said demand for acts of God coverage had increased after tropical storm Ondoy ravaged Metro Manila and neighboring provinces last September 26.
But he said non-life insurers were wary of selling such policies as they were still in the process of assessing the country’s risk to natural disasters.
Currently, about one out of four vehicles have acts of God coverage.
Insurance Commissioner Eduardo T. Malinis said the regulator would only endorse to lawmakers what industry players recommend.
"It would depend on the insurers. The rate of the premium must be adequate. We have to talk to PIRA about it," Mr. Malinis told BusinessWorld.
The PIRA said claims from damage caused by Ondoy could reach P11 billion, P1 billion of which would involve motor vehicles.
PIRA officials said the industry had the capability to service the claims but warned that profitability would take a hit this year.
- Gerard S. dela Peña, BusinessWorld