
Originally Posted by
abort_retry
hi guys.... i need your opinion on this matter. last nov 3. while travelling northbound on my starex in SLEX with my family, just on the detour area on the ongoing expansion project near susanna heights exit, a truck full of sand turned left to offload content on the center isle. vehicles on the rear of the truck slowed down. i was moving moderate but i have wide space in front so i braked slowly to come to halt. split second after coming to halt, i heard a thud on the rear of my van and consequently my van moved a distance forward. i said to myself.... my god... nabangga tayo.... then seconds later a screeching tire noise and another bump noise occured on the rear. not another bump on my rear but of another vehicle. so what happened is a vehicular accident between three vehicles. my starex(front), innova(middle), and hi-ace(rear). now comes the police report, hi-ace driver, me and my wife testified with the same statement, that innova hit us first then hi-ace follows.
our statement is based on the fact that we manifested the first bump and then followed by a second bump and screeching tires. hi-ace driver statement is based on his foresight that innova hit us first after him hitting innova. now innova driver statement is different. he testified that hi-ace hit him hard that made his innova ram into our starex. damage on my starex is long depression on the bottom right portion of the tailgate and right rear portion of bumper pressed inward and moved 1/2 inch lower. fastener of end of right bumper were torn and separeted from its bracket. innovas damage was front bumper disalignment and depression and major wreck on his tailgate but upper glass window was not harmed. hi-ace damage is a major wreck on its front and a big cut on the windshield. the 4 statements were written on the police report. off record on paper but verbal, hi-ace drive alleged that both of them are on a speed chase on SLEX. investigating officer left it with two opposing statements because it is the job of the court to prove should any party come forward that a resolution is not met. but according to him based on a similar incidents, it is who bumps you that is liable. and due to our statement and the hi-ace driver, the investigating officer claims that innova is liable to us. since he holds a comprehensive insurance policy, investigating officer instructed innova driver/owner to furnish me copy. so days goes by and i called up innova owner wife through her cellphone and insist that they are not liable to the damage made by their innova on our starex. and oh....raises her voice, angry that we testified differently.... she said their insurance will take care of it.... so this monday, i sent a friend to file a no claim to my insurance and then file a claim to the innova's insurance. then comes tuesday, insurance company called me up and said that they are in favor of their clients statement and they cannot honor my claim because according to their client he is not the one liable to the accident. it is hi-ace that made the entire thing. that i should file the claim on hi-ace insurance. now i am angry..... i said a lot of stuff to the insurance officer.... he said they cannot do anything unless their client tells them that he is liable. now here is my problem, my wife is mad about the whole thing. i am mad too because of the innova driver wife behavior... answer: i cannot claim damages... but i am skilled and experienced at fixing things. it develops as a hobby for me to fix my cars, from mechaninal, to basic electrical, to body repair and painting.... and i have tools to repair the damage.... not a problem with me.... but what gets my nerve is the innova thing disagreement to my claim.... so i consulted the nearest hyundai dealership, lto friends and traffic police neighbor. they said to me to go forward and proceed with legal action. tomorrow i will visit the traffic police headquarters in alabang to consult with the investigating officer. i decided to pursue legal action with the innova and hi-ace drivers should they not satisfy me with a favorable resolution. they have to prove in court who is liable to me. although it is a slow process that may take months or years, it is not a disadvantage to me. in fact it is an advantage because they will waste their time attending hearings. innova driver is a businessman so that would make him take a timeoff on his choirs. not a big disappointment on mine because i work on the PM time when i feel working because i work mostly graveyard shift. my question is, if they pursue going for a trial in court, both will have a civil case against me right? or anyone of them it doesnt matter.... should be anyone of them proven to be liable, is it still a claim between me and their insurance company? or of their pocket already?
can i claim for moral damages? i am asking this for chances that i can get infos especially to tsikoters that have understanding about this legal matter: ie law students, lawyers, other legal resources.....
many thanks in advance.