New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47
  1. Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    13,919
    #1

    Ask yourself who you’d rather be: Tesla or GM? Better yet, ask Nokia




    Opinion: Tesla will overrun traditional car companies because they still aren’t moving fast enough
    Published: Jan 20, 2019 10:03 a.m. ET


    Ask yourself who you’d rather be: Tesla or GM? Better yet, ask Nokia





    It took the worst corporate scandal in automotive history for Volkswagen to make the necessary decision to transform itself into an electric car company. The world’s largest car maker will spend $50 billion over the next five years to develop 50 new electric models, an increase from six today, and produce 1 million electric cars by 2025. (It produced 10.88 million cars in total in 2017.)

    This radical reinvention is exactly what is needed to stave off a challenge from Tesla TSLA, +0.18% and a band of upstarts from California and China that are building for an electric future. Other car companies, from General Motors GM, -1.19% to BMW BMW, -0.44% BMW, -0.41% aren’t showing the same sense of urgency — and that could be their downfall.

    This sounds like a dramatic claim when you consider that GM, for instance, makes 10 million cars a year and Tesla hasn’t even made half a million in its 14-year lifetime. But while today’s electric car sales numbers are small, the trends from Tesla alone should be enough to scare the hell out of established automakers.

    In August, Tesla’s Model 3 comfortably outsold the perennially best-selling BMW 3-Series in U.S. according to sales estimates. That’s impressive for Tesla’s first foray into the premium mass-market segment, but it’s only just getting started. The cheapest version of the Model 3 is yet to come, and Tesla still has hundreds of thousands of back-orders to fill. Last quarter, Tesla made twice as many cars at it did in the previous quarter. And it’s now profitable.

    Read: In sweeping interview, Elon Musk says Tesla will be cash-flow positive ‘all quarters going forward’

    More importantly, the broader trends favor a bright future for electric vehicles and a dark one for those powered by gasoline. Battery costs are dropping so quickly that the sticker price on electric cars may be lower than their gasoline equivalents by the mid-2020s. Regulations in almost every major country other than the United States are trending toward ending sales of gasoline vehicles and encouraging the purchase of electric cars, or “new energy vehicles” as they’re called in China, the world’s largest auto market. And consumer demand for electric vehicles is increasing rapidly, both in the U.S. and in China.

    Other automakers seem to be hoping that mild gestures and good publicity will get them through the crisis. Volvo VOLVB, -1.09% VOLVA, -0.81% owned by Geely Automobile Holdings 0175, -2.67% , is aiming for electric cars to make up half of its sales by 2025. GM has promised 20 electric models by 2023 and has said it believes “the future is all-electric,” but it hasn’t set a date by which it will make the full transition. Ford F, +0.12% has said it will invest $11 billion in the production of electric vehicles by 2022 and have 16 fully electric models by then. BMW has announced plans for 25 electric models by 2025, but its head of research and development has said he expects 85% of the company’s cars will still have internal combustion engines in 2030.

    The problem for traditional automakers is that they are too deeply wedded to an old technology headed for obsolescence — along with the way they’ve been doing business for decades.

    Those who still believe in traditional automakers point their manufacturing expertise and well-established supply chains, sales and marketing partnerships, and distribution networks as a structural advantage. BMW, for instance, has 30 manufacturing sites for internal combustion engine-based vehicles in 14 countries. They are good at making cars.

    But an electric vehicle is a different proposition, with a different manufacturing process, different parts, a different sales and education approach and different supporting infrastructure. The problem for the likes of GM and BMW is that the kind of quick transition that’s required for survival in an electric world would lay large parts of their existing businesses to waste.

    Carsten Breitfeld, who headed up BMW’s i3 and i8 electric car programs and is now the CEO of Chinese electric carmaker Byton, told me that the established automakers are stuck. “They’re doing too many cars right now with the old technology, earning a lot of money out of it, being very profitable,” Breitfeld said.

    What’s more, the typically grey-haired board directors at these companies are focused on three-to-five-year outcomes instead of the long term, said Breitfeld. “They’re concentrating very much on today’s and tomorrow’s businesses.”



    To be sure, Tesla has more than a few of its own vulnerabilities. Despite its recent profitability, it has enormous debt, and its future as a true mass manufacturer is far from assured. It has experienced more than its fair share of quality issues, and its recent surge in production was aided by extreme measures, including a production facility housed under a tent-like temporary structure outside its factory in Fremont, Calif.

    Other electric-car startups — such as Nio, Byton, Lucid Motors, Che He Jia, and Singulato Motors — are in their still-tender youth. Only Nio NIO, -2.09% , which raised $1 billion in an initial public offering on the New York Stock Exchange in September, has started production, and so far has reported just over 3,200 cars delivered (all in China).

    The established automakers still have a chance of participating in an electric revolution, but those who assume they will be there by default are being overly optimistic. The car company of the future is not one that can produce the occasional good electric car among a suite of gasoline-burners. It must concentrate on developing cars that will dominate the next 20 years. The longer it waits, the greater the challenge becomes.

    Ask yourself who you’d rather be: Tesla or GM? Better yet, ask Nokia.


    Hamish McKenzie is the author of “Insane Mode: How Elon Musk’s Tesla Sparked a Revolution to End the Age of Oil.” Follow him on Twitter: *hamishmckenzie

    Tesla will overrun traditional car companies because they still aren’t moving fast enough - MarketWatch

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    52,731
    #2
    i suppose, because you posted the entire long text,
    you haven't decided, yourself.
    heh heh.

  3. Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    14,700
    #3
    kung gusto ni tesla or any electric car owner lumakas benta or lumaki
    gawin nila yung ginawa ni Ford way back. isang model lang and same tech (their current tech naman is good for the next 20 years?), and cost should go down. palitan ang shell ng mas mura ang manfacturing (current shell ng tesla is expensive), at tanggalin ang proprietary stuff nila sa body (wala kwenta since di naman tech yun).
    mag pickup yan once their low mid income can afford it, tipong imbis na camry bilihin tesla nalang.


    btw ano ba nakalagay sa article, di ko binasa eh LOL

  4. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    52,731
    #4
    naku...
    "all teslas will be available in a variety of rainbow colors, as long as they are black."
    heh heh.
    good ol' henry.

    akurin. hindiku pa binasa. maybe later... this month!
    hinala ko, hindi rin binasa ni kags, and is counting on feedback from the tsikoteers to fuel his future posts.
    but if none of us here will read the lengthy article... this post might very well die of starvation.

    i noticed,
    the tesla trademark reminds me of tata's.
    Last edited by dr. d; January 23rd, 2019 at 11:24 AM.

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    3,484
    #5
    It was Nissan with its Leaf who pioneered mass production of all-electric, those times they were struggling with sales of iCe and its not cheap deploying charging infra. It so happen that Tesla has the moolah and won't care losing money. Today, almost all ice manufacturers add all-electric in their models to get along with the hype.

    There is still an argument what technology could bring the least carbon footprint, apparently all-electric is NOT that eco friendly, its still the efficient diesels. Also with the rise of demand, resources for lithium and rare-earth metals will be the next problem.

    Let's see for the next 5yrs how eV would replace iCe. For now mga e-trikes palang ang nakikita ko sa major thoroughfares and they have limited charging stations. Also, i'm happy with what Tesla did with the 18650 cells, naging popular sya from the usual laptop battery and cordless drill application - this is what i'm using for my DiY electric projects. Sana wag muna polymer as what they are doing with the newer internal battery of laptops.

  6. Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,536
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by 12vdc View Post
    It was Nissan with its Leaf who pioneered mass production of all-electric, those times they were struggling with sales of iCe and its not cheap deploying charging infra. It so happen that Tesla has the moolah and won't care losing money. Today, almost all ice manufacturers add all-electric in their models to get along with the hype.

    There is still an argument what technology could bring the least carbon footprint, apparently all-electric is NOT that eco friendly, its still the efficient diesels. Also with the rise of demand, resources for lithium and rare-earth metals will be the next problem.

    Let's see for the next 5yrs how eV would replace iCe. For now mga e-trikes palang ang nakikita ko sa major thoroughfares and they have limited charging stations. Also, i'm happy with what Tesla did with the 18650 cells, naging popular sya from the usual laptop battery and cordless drill application - this is what i'm using for my DiY electric projects. Sana wag muna polymer as what they are doing with the newer internal battery of laptops.

    tesla didn't popularize the 18650. they used the 18650 coz it was already the most popular format. but now they use the 21700 cell size

    electric cars are POTENTIALLY very environment friendly. it depends on how we'll generate the electricity in the future. whereas ICE engines will never be eco friendly i.e. the wrong path if we want a greener future

  7. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    7,119
    #7
    ^
    I suppose the push for EVs particularly in the EU could have more to do with the net oil importing nations' desire to diminish oil producing nations' influence on geopolitics.

  8. Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    14,700
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by 12vdc View Post
    It was Nissan with its Leaf who pioneered mass production of all-electric, those times they were struggling with sales of iCe and its not cheap deploying charging infra. It so happen that Tesla has the moolah and won't care losing money. Today, almost all ice manufacturers add all-electric in their models to get along with the hype.

    There is still an argument what technology could bring the least carbon footprint, apparently all-electric is NOT that eco friendly, its still the efficient diesels. Also with the rise of demand, resources for lithium and rare-earth metals will be the next problem.

    Let's see for the next 5yrs how eV would replace iCe. For now mga e-trikes palang ang nakikita ko sa major thoroughfares and they have limited charging stations. Also, i'm happy with what Tesla did with the 18650 cells, naging popular sya from the usual laptop battery and cordless drill application - this is what i'm using for my DiY electric projects. Sana wag muna polymer as what they are doing with the newer internal battery of laptops.
    safer ang li poly bro diba, mas expensive nga lang?

  9. Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,536
    #9
    Quote Originally Posted by ninjababez View Post
    kung gusto ni tesla or any electric car owner lumakas benta or lumaki
    gawin nila yung ginawa ni Ford way back. isang model lang and same tech (their current tech naman is good for the next 20 years?), and cost should go down. palitan ang shell ng mas mura ang manfacturing (current shell ng tesla is expensive), at tanggalin ang proprietary stuff nila sa body (wala kwenta since di naman tech yun).
    mag pickup yan once their low mid income can afford it, tipong imbis na camry bilihin tesla nalang.


    btw ano ba nakalagay sa article, di ko binasa eh LOL

    they'll get there soon. but right now their business model is based on selling expensive cars that actually beat BMW sales. and it's working

    but right now they can't compete at the camry level in terms of pricing. not yet...

  10. Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    3,484
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by ninjababez View Post
    safer ang li poly bro diba, mas expensive nga lang?
    They all explode when short-ckted. 18650's can be repacked/replaced easily. Poly doesn't have a standard form-factor while 18650 is universal. Imagine kung may calamity wala kuryente you could just swap the batteries from the car to the UPS/inverter and other 18650 operated devices.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Opinion: Tesla will overrun traditional car companies because they still aren’t moving fast enough