For the benefit and ease of access to the tsikoteers, I decided to make a new one. The results were posted on the senbel vs chemrez showdown thread, but I decided to separate it para mas makita ninyo. I just copied the messages from the other forum where I updated the results more than over here.
For the benefit of everybody, the following are the results of our senbel estrol biodiesel use, on the following procedure: initial 2% blend on the 1st fuel load, 1% on succeeding load.
1. Isuzu Fuego
w/o biodiesel covering 6,790 kms, 9.56km/liter
w biodiesel covering 920 kms, 9.92km/liter
Improvement of 0.36km/liter
2. Townace using 2C engine
w/o biodiesel covering 1,384kms 6.6km/liter
w biodiesel covering 609 kms 7.29km/liter
Improvement of 0.69km/liter
3. Isuzu 10W truck
w/o biodiesel covering 1,227kms 2.03km/liter
w biodiesel covering 330kms 3.16km/liter
Improvement of 1.13km/liter
4. 6Wheel Canter
w/o biodiesel covering 1,366kms 4.14km/liter
w biodiesel covering 366kms 3.84km/liter
Negative performance of 0.3km/liter
Take note the canter had a lower fuel economy result. But this is still one fuel load, plus trucks usage are very erratic, sometimes travelling long distance, sometimes idle most of the time loading and unloading stuff. will continue to monitor the results. There are other units on biodiesel but are not monitoring the others as much as the above units.
Posted Feb16 2005.
fuego is only around 3%, the townace around 10%, the truck around 50%. But you see, the fuego is well maintained as can be seen with the fuel economy without biodiesel, so its improvement is limited. The townace, I forgot to mention, we had it smoke tested at TESDA. Before putting in the initial dose, the reading was 4.5, then after putting the biodiesel, after 3 days, it was tested, it was down to 2.5. Trucks on the other hand, have more glaring results, percentage wise, coz their starting figures are low. The trucks have lower mileage as they do a lot of standby time than small vehicles. I will be refueling the fuego tomorrow but I expect it to have better than the above fuel economy.
Oh, by the way, smoke emissions have significantly reduced based on visual. Especially with my sedona, now doing 400kms on biodiesel.
Posted Feb19.
Update on the fuego.
Latest 3rd refuel with biodiesel covering 450kms, 11.3km/liter.
I am surprised with this, don't know if this mainly due to the effect of the biodiesel or the kind of traffic encountered for this particular 450 km refuel.
Posted March 1.
latest update. 4th refuel today, 446kms on 47.15 liters including 500 ml biodiesel, gives me only 9.46km/liter. Tama siguro ang duda ko na hindi na full tank ng driver ko ang 3rd refuel. If I combine the 3rd and 4th refuel, it will average 10.30km/liter. If I add up with the 1st report, my fuego have run 1,816 kms, and averaged 10.11km/liter, or an improvement of 0.55km/liter. I think 1,816kms is sufficient to come to a conclusion of improved fuel economy, based on mixed, and regular driving conditions.




Reply With Quote
thanks in advance

