Mazda cx7 2.5 vs subaru forester 2.0x

[tmaclim01]

Guys, can u plz give me some advice between cx7 and forester? nagdadalawang isip kc aq between the two

[eggman]

Mag Tucson ka nalang..Mahal nang Forester 2 Liter 4WD ganoon din ang Mazda CX-7

[powerloord]

Mag Tucson ka nalang..Mahal nang Forester 2 Liter 4WD ganoon din ang Mazda CX-7

Sa tingin ko naman Tmaclim01 can afford either of the two.

[111prez]

Mag Tucson ka nalang..Mahal nang Forester 2 Liter 4WD ganoon din ang Mazda CX-7

if the TS wanted to consider the tucson, i am sure he would put this in the thread title

[docgorio]

Subaru... For its unique look and grand performance...

Mazda if you like value for money...

Me?? Subaru...

[renzo_d10]

Subaru. Atleast AWD na.

[noobskie]

Subaru 2.0x if compared to the CX-7. Pero if you want to consider the Tucson ix, well that's a different story.

[daimengrui]

Stay on Topic.

If you have read the Top Gear comparos the Subaru Forester in itself is not at par with the other SUVs unless mag Subaru Forester XT ka. Let me quote Botchi Santos about his description of the Subaru 2.0 variant:

The Subaru Forester 2.0 is disappointing--unworthy of the Subaru badge and Symmetrical AWD system it carries being grossly underpowered

Compared against the CX-7. The Updated model of the Cx-7 handles very well (typical of a Mazda) and drives like a sports car. It really has the power despite it being a FWD vehicle. AWD will only matter when the road is wet and you're racing on it. You should test drive both.

PS. Consider the fuel economy figures of the SUVs you are buying. I must warn you that Foresters and CX-7 are not for "frugal" people.

However, styling-wise. Both options look ok to me. However my vote goes to the CX-7. It looks more expensive that it cost. Looks like a Lexus drives like a RX-8

[eggman]

The CX-7 would be a great choice pero sayang 2WD lang sya and its kinda expensive..Still its better than the Forester 2 Liter.