New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 33 of 33

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,627
    #1
    Quote Originally Posted by carwhacko View Post
    Bakit kaya ser? While yung iba okay ang fc.
    when new, my wigo AT did 8 km/li. after 1000 km oil change and odo now at 1500 km, it's giving me 9 km/li in the city. the engine has now smoothened significantly.. it's not as loud nor vibratious as before..
    i was told this wigo's engine design is at least 10 years old, and has no electro-mechanical tricks.. just a basic engine.. hence the not-so-comparably good fuel sipper..

    but hey! i'm coming from a gas-guzzling 7 km/li car.. so i'm not about to complain just yet..

  2. Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    406
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by carwhacko View Post
    Bakit kaya ser? While yung iba okay ang fc.
    Siguro break in period? Tinanong pa niya SA niya bakit ganun and gusto ipacheck. Sana break in period lang and mag improve FC over time

  3. Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,738
    #3
    wag na magtaka kung mdyo malakas sa gas ang wigo.yan ata ang normal na consumo eh.tipid din yan compara sa malalaki makina pag naipit sa traffic.

  4. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by carwhacko View Post
    Bakit kaya ser? While yung iba okay ang fc.
    With little traffic and gentle driving, the Wigo AT is okay.

    When the roads are congested, it's not. In my experience, the Wigo AT is thirstier than the Mirage and Swift AT in the same level of traffic. And since the Mirage is roughly as economical as the first gen Jazz 1.3... (later Jazzes were not nearly as economical) that reinforces the claim that the Wigo is thirstier than the Jazz.

    The Wigo MT seems better... but I have yet to do any long distance testing in that.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  5. Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    96
    #5
    I've been reading around, and according to the reviews, Wigo gets 8km/L in moderate traffic, while Mirage gets 10km/L.

    If I drive 7T km a year, assuming fuel stays within the PHP50 range, fuel costs would be roughly 43,750 for the Toyota and 35,000 for the Mitsu.

    Can anyone confirm if the Swift's rear legroom is really smaller than the Wigo's?

    How long is the breaking period for these cars?

  6. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,627
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by justin_ View Post
    I've been reading around, and according to the reviews, Wigo gets 8km/L in moderate traffic, while Mirage gets 10km/L.

    If I drive 7T km a year, assuming fuel stays within the PHP50 range, fuel costs would be roughly 43,750 for the Toyota and 35,000 for the Mitsu.

    Can anyone confirm if the Swift's rear legroom is really smaller than the Wigo's?

    How long is the breaking period for these cars?
    rear legroom? what rear legroom? my knees are already touching the swift's front seats! the wigo's is much better..

    so if i drive like you, it'll take me 12 years or so, for my wigo's higher fuel expense to even it up against its 100K lower price, vis a vis the mirage... a good argument, if i may say so..

    but what i can't say anything about yet, is the build quality of the wigo vs the mirage.. only time will tell. i assumed the wigo is built better, which is why i got it over the mirage.. we'll see in a few years..
    Last edited by dr. d; December 8th, 2014 at 11:32 PM.

  7. Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    14,700
    #7
    ^ganyan din kami pumili. 6' ako kaya madalas full size sedan lang ako ok sa driver and back of passenger :sly:

  8. Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    61
    #8
    Wrong post

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Wigo G A/T vs Mirage GLX A/T vs Celero GL A/T